But the gameplay is not better i also posted that it plays exactly like WAW. I would be perfectly happy with better gameplay > graphics but not from sequels which are expected to have the full package.
There is literally thousands of people complaining about the graphics in Black Ops, as soon as i put it on i was very shocked to say the least with how it looked (wouldnt have been so bad if MW2 didnt look so good in comparison).
As if it plays
exactly like WaW mate. For starters, you have credits in case you had not realised. You then have new perks, removal of things like juggernaut and stopping power which completely changes the game up. You now can not quick scope either which is changing alot of the gameplay and moving non serious snipers away from the weapon. Then you get this new damage system where the weapons have changed in damage and bullets needed to kill. There are new modes with entirely new weapons we have never seen before such as the crossbow and ballistic knife, were they in WaW, no.
So this game is miles from the same as WaW and far away from MW2 in terms of gameplay.
First of all age has nothing to do with maturity.
I couldn't care less who is calling me immature cos frankly it doesnt bother me. What bothers me is coming on this forum and getting nothing but cheeky/sarcastic replies to things i see posted or posted myself. Probably around 80% of the time by some kid who has a high post count thinks they can belittle someone on a forum.
If you are getting sarcastic/ cheeky replies all the time, have you thought about how you post might be the problem mate? You were being so blunt, just coming in here and going 'oh the graphics are 🤬. Most of us can relate to a bad connection so I do not need to elaborate in that but we all cannot understand where you are coming from with this graphics thing you have going here. Care to help us out and say whats wrong?
I have a high post count here because I have been here 3 years, not because I post whore and of all things,
belittle other people. You are overreacting alot mate, everything is being taken the wrong way by you...
The point of my post was to highlight how rude he had been and how he had taken my comment and tried to make a mockery of me, all i had done was add points to the discussion to try and get other forum members opinions of how this game lacks in the graphics department (big style). As soon as i posted a slightly emphasised version of his very condescending post he did not like it and as per usual i expect his chums/premium chums to add to the discussion very shortly.
He has a name, as the saying goes, 'she is the cat's mother'. A MOCKERY of you?! Excuse me? The last thing anyone aims to do on this forum is make a mockery of someone, you just had a straight out point which was not proved or contributing to much at all. Lets go back to your old post, where in the world does it say, 'What are your opinions'? It doesn't! It just complains about them and says how they are a huge mistake and treyarch should be embarrassed. Which, in mine and almost everyone elses opinion, is not the case.
You calling my good friend Dragonistic a Chum? I personally take alot of offence to a
friend of mine being called a chum. I did NOT ask for Phil to come into this conversation, Phil just did because he is a real man and not just some guy who seems to pay out everyone who isn't his friend.
I used to frequent this site often till i realised how obnoxious a lot of the members are, they always have something to prove and someone to patronise.
Yeah well, they call it life. Deal with it.
EDIT: On a side note here, I lost 1000cr for not being able to connect to a medium level wager match last night, fail...
@ calling mw2 graphics good. You get sparks when you shoot the grass in that game ffs. Almost everything in mw2 was terrible but by far map design was the worst and that made the gameplay bad. Plus people actually shoot one another in BO unlike mw2 which was just explosives and MLC.
.
