- 11,511
- United States
Front = Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano
Side = Nissan GTR (fender vents) + Aston Martin one-77 (rear windows)
Back = Camaro
What the hell Chevrolet.....
Add
Front SRT Viper GTS `13
Roof SRT Viper GTS `13
Front = Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano
Side = Nissan GTR (fender vents) + Aston Martin one-77 (rear windows)
Back = Camaro
What the hell Chevrolet.....
You do understand the concept of camouflage don't you and that it's used by all manufacturers for all cars when they aren't launched yet when testing? Ofcourse the taillights are completely different as the masked version was aimed to disguise the real lights, you know, to fool us.
A game you bought over two years ago just gave you a brand new car. For free - There should be no complaining.
Until we (individually) have every single car in the game, any car that shows up in the UCD & OCD are new. Some of the cars that I PAID FOR that were on the disc, I might not ever come across. I've hit the 1000 mark and I'm still getting odd fracking Miatas that I don't own!!!
If you think about it, not being able to adjust this car is a good thing. It prevents legalized cheating, the ONLY advantage or disadvantage anyone has is their driving ability. I've been saying that PD should have an available tune that is setup with their expertise. The garbage default tune that is on many cars does nothing to encourage people to play this game.
So in a speed test with the C7, I hit 208mph. That seems pretty fast for a 1500 kilo car with only 464 hp. So I tried some other cars with similar specs, and nothing else comes close to hitting that sort of speed. For example, I tested a 2010 Camaro with 1500Kg and 464hp, roughly the same torque, and the best it could do was 184mph. That's a huge difference. It needed 660 hp to hit 205mph, which was the best I could do.
What's up with that?
Different engine.
Different transmission.
Different gear ratio.
Different torque figures.
So in a speed test with the C7, I hit 208mph. That seems pretty fast for a 1500 kilo car with only 464 hp. So I tried some other cars with similar specs, and nothing else comes close to hitting that sort of speed. For example, I tested a 2010 Camaro with 1500Kg and 464hp, roughly the same torque, and the best it could do was 184mph. That's a huge difference. It needed 660 hp to hit 205mph, which was the best I could do.
What's up with that?
The Camaro has the aerodynamics of the 2010 Camaro, for starters. Curb weight has almost nothing to do with top speed.
You might be able to get higher if it was a full lobby and X1s and Veyron and etc.I did a race on Route x in it and when in the draft it got up to 238mph.
Maybe top speed of C7 is higher than it is in real life. Never until now a car with under 500HP has reached 200mph.
Ferrari F40. Porsche 959. Lamborghini Diablo.
Well, all I can say is that new 'Vette must be one slick puppy. Greased Lightning. And the Camaro must have the aerodynamics of a Freight-liner in comparison.
Pretty impressive about the Yellow Bird. A car from the 80's with 469hp doing 211mph is nuts.
Tuning is legalized cheating? I've heard it all now.
Also if the default setups PD did use are supposedly garbage what makes you think they have expertise to make a better tune? If they did, why wouldn't that be the default already?
Plus, even if F50 has Cw=0.35, C7 must have Cw=0.29 to reach 200mph. Very difficult. Lets see the real top speed when it launches then.
![]()
I quite like this car. It's noise is amazing, it looks fantastic. Handles like a dream.
Hell, even the tail-lights are growing on me.
I quite like this car. It's noise is amazing, it looks fantastic. Handles like a dream.
Hell, even the tail-lights are growing on me.