Do you still support PD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tecknical
  • 700 comments
  • 33,722 views
Yes i do support PD in their efforts. I'm happy someone came out with a series and concept like GT. Even if it's not everyones idea of what it should be, their passion and dedication to the vision is beyond question.
 
insult,curse...some fanboys just wanna say XXX is the best, you guys should buy one!

please save it, go home & play your bowling with cars...
 
Tenacious D keeps suggesting that because the game has been out for so long now, our complaints no longer need to be heard.
Let me see if you've actually read my posts rather than gloss over them. Why did I say what I said about complaining over an indefinite period of time?

Let me take one of your tacts on this point. What new debate points have you guys brought to the table, which you haven't said for months on end now? What new angle have you brought to light? What new brilliant insights have you come to dazzle us with?

All I hear is "GT5 has all these things I don't like about it." Sometimes this includes, "I'm done with GT5, I'm done with GT, and I'm done with Playstation." Gee, how constructive is that in the pursuit of improving Gran Turismo? What does bailing accomplish?

This still boils down to all of you complainers acting like PD hasn't done a thing since GT5's release. Not one change, not one patch made. This is what I have a problem with. If GT5 remained unchanged over the past nine months, if GT5 hadn't evolved due to massive fan reactions to things like the damage issue, I'd agree that something had gone critically wrong with both Polyphony and Kazunori, and the game we all know and love as Gran Turismo might have toppled over a cliff.

This is not the situation. So, no, I don't agree that Kaz and PD have lost it, that they don't listen to fan reaction - and crap, this is freaking obvious. I also don't agree with how bad GT5 is. You race other games. When I race, it's only in GT5, at least right now. GT5 doesn't meet your needs. It meets mine. Not perfectly, but well enough to put a smile on my face when I tear around the Nurb in any number of cars I own. The AI is good enough to put up the fight necessary to make me try and outgun them, so I don't need to race online, and haven't for months. Maybe you think I'm "wrong" for thinking this way, but I wasn't put on this earth to think everything you say is right or smart or valid.

Maybe you guys think it's insulting that we like GT5 and still admire Kaz and PD. Maybe you think it's hurting the cause of making Gran Turismo a better game.

Well, last I checked, a patch was just released, and additional patches and content are coming in the next few months. The team has been working on something. If it's not what you want, oh well. Last I checked, no game company asked me what I wanted their game to be. In fact, in the case of Turn 10 and Eutechnyx, I was frankly told to be quiet. Make of this what you will.
 
Tenacious D
Let me see if you've actually read my posts rather than gloss over them. Why did I say what I said about complaining over an indefinite period of time?

Let me take one of your tacts on this point. What new debate points have you guys brought to the table, which you haven't said for months on end now? What new angle have you brought to light? What new brilliant insights have you come to dazzle us with?

All I hear is "GT5 has all these things I don't like about it." Sometimes this includes, "I'm done with GT5, I'm done with GT, and I'm done with Playstation." Gee, how constructive is that in the pursuit of improving Gran Turismo? What does bailing accomplish?

This still boils down to all of you complainers acting like PD hasn't done a thing since GT5's release. Not one change, not one patch made. This is what I have a problem with. If GT5 remained unchanged over the past nine months, if GT5 hadn't evolved due to massive fan reactions to things like the damage issue, I'd agree that something had gone critically wrong with both Polyphony and Kazunori, and the game we all know and love as Gran Turismo might have toppled over a cliff.

This is not the situation. So, no, I don't agree that Kaz and PD have lost it, that they don't listen to fan reaction - and crap, this is freaking obvious. I also don't agree with how bad GT5 is. You race other games. When I race, it's only in GT5, at least right now. GT5 doesn't meet your needs. It meets mine. Not perfectly, but well enough to put a smile on my face when I tear around the Nurb in any number of cars I own. The AI is good enough to put up the fight necessary to make me try and outgun them, so I don't need to race online, and haven't for months. Maybe you think I'm "wrong" for thinking this way, but I wasn't put on this earth to think everything you say is right or smart or valid.

Maybe you guys think it's insulting that we like GT5 and still admire Kaz and PD. Maybe you think it's hurting the cause of making Gran Turismo a better game.

Well, last I checked, a patch was just released, and additional patches and content are coming in the next few months. The team has been working on something. If it's not what you want, oh well. Last I checked, no game company asked me what I wanted their game to be. In fact, in the case of Turn 10 and Eutechnyx, I was frankly told to be quiet. Make of this what you will.

I nominate you for president. :p
 
Let me see if you've actually read my posts rather than gloss over them. Why did I say what I said about complaining over an indefinite period of time?

Let me take one of your tacts on this point. What new debate points have you guys brought to the table, which you haven't said for months on end now? What new angle have you brought to light? What new brilliant insights have you come to dazzle us with?

All I hear is "GT5 has all these things I don't like about it." Sometimes this includes, "I'm done with GT5, I'm done with GT, and I'm done with Playstation." Gee, how constructive is that in the pursuit of improving Gran Turismo? What does bailing accomplish?

This still boils down to all of you complainers acting like PD hasn't done a thing since GT5's release. Not one change, not one patch made. This is what I have a problem with. If GT5 remained unchanged over the past nine months, if GT5 hadn't evolved due to massive fan reactions to things like the damage issue, I'd agree that something had gone critically wrong with both Polyphony and Kazunori, and the game we all know and love as Gran Turismo might have toppled over a cliff.

This is not the situation. So, no, I don't agree that Kaz and PD have lost it, that they don't listen to fan reaction - and crap, this is freaking obvious. I also don't agree with how bad GT5 is. You race other games. When I race, it's only in GT5, at least right now. GT5 doesn't meet your needs. It meets mine. Not perfectly, but well enough to put a smile on my face when I tear around the Nurb in any number of cars I own. The AI is good enough to put up the fight necessary to make me try and outgun them, so I don't need to race online, and haven't for months. Maybe you think I'm "wrong" for thinking this way, but I wasn't put on this earth to think everything you say is right or smart or valid.

Maybe you guys think it's insulting that we like GT5 and still admire Kaz and PD. Maybe you think it's hurting the cause of making Gran Turismo a better game.

Well, last I checked, a patch was just released, and additional patches and content are coming in the next few months. The team has been working on something. If it's not what you want, oh well. Last I checked, no game company asked me what I wanted their game to be. In fact, in the case of Turn 10 and Eutechnyx, I was frankly told to be quiet. Make of this what you will.
👍
Unfortunately.. The mass wont get a hold of the excellent Statement :guilty:

Basically people are too busy focusing on the negatives (as if this is the only game with negative) and not the positives .. that probably out number the negatives..
 
I nominate you for president. :p
I accept this nomination. :D But seriously, thanks for the good words. I try and actually contribute to this place now and then.

And I'll toss up one more thing here. I'm all for making suggestions as to how GT5 - and 6 - can be better. There's not a thing wrong with saying the XP system is frooky, or asking why the paint shop has no paint. Or why Standard cars can't have wheels changed. (Answer: they're modeled on the cars right now, and they don't have swapping ability resolved yet. It may not happen, and the same for driver views in Standards). Asking for things to be improved without adding in "And by the way, Kaz/PD/GT5 sux" shouldn't be too hard for you guys.

I'm the last person you want to talk to if you want to ask if GT5 is perfect. I have about 15 things I'd change about it, like ripping out the XP system, adding in a LOT more events to A-Spec, scrapping most of the paint chip silliness - I'd have special chips show up on occasion, but not make them super rare. There are lots of changes I'd make. I will give Kaz and PD the benefit of the doubt because I don't know how difficult the stuff they're working on is. I hope it's super nifty stuff like some new tracks and cars. I'd love to see Red Rock Mountain and Grindelwald, as well as real life courses like Hockingham, Spa and some tracks from all over the world. Heck, new fantasy tracks would be nice. I'm hoping for a few surprises I hadn't thought of.

See, I typed all that up without a grumpy attitude or veiled threats to anyone. Just things I'd like to see. If I don't see anything else I've asked for, oh well, I'll wait to see what they do cook up for us.
 
Let me see if you've actually read my posts rather than gloss over them. Why did I say what I said about complaining over an indefinite period of time?

You said it here, I was paraphrasing for brevity in my post...

You both must have missed my bullet point on how long the game has been out. This isn't January. The game has been out for nearly a year now. Complaining about the same things over and over ad harfium is seriously old. Complaining about them even more will change nothing. You guys act like the amount of grumping will result in something. Like if you whine to your mom enough, eventually you can get her to do anything you want.
Let me take one of your tacts on this point. What new debate points have you guys brought to the table, which you haven't said for months on end now? What new angle have you brought to light? What new brilliant insights have you come to dazzle us with?

All I hear is "GT5 has all these things I don't like about it." Sometimes this includes, "I'm done with GT5, I'm done with GT, and I'm done with Playstation." Gee, how constructive is that in the pursuit of improving Gran Turismo? What does bailing accomplish?

We don't need to bring new points to the table. PD have enough issues to deal with :sly:

But as I said
As has been mentioned several times in this thread, whenever someone states a negative opinion of GT5 [and I say again the only reason we are still complaining is because we actually like(d) the series and care about its future] a bunch of posters leap on the thread telling us we are whiners & complainers and we should be grateful to PD for taking our money and not delivering on a game we enjoy.
...
I would like to point out that as long as they are still providing updates and fixes to the game, there is still always the possibility that some of the things people don't like about it can be changed.

That's never going to happen if everyone defends the sub standard aspects of the game simply because it is GT.

It's not really doing anyone any good if the people who love the game as it is keep jumping into threads simply to call people whiners.


This still boils down to all of you complainers acting like PD hasn't done a thing since GT5's release. Not one change, not one patch made. This is what I have a problem with. If GT5 remained unchanged over the past nine months, if GT5 hadn't evolved due to massive fan reactions to things like the damage issue, I'd agree that something had gone critically wrong with both Polyphony and Kazunori, and the game we all know and love as Gran Turismo might have toppled over a cliff.

I have never denied that PD haven't attempted any patches. I have said in this thread itself, that at least PD continue to support the game long after other developers give up & move on.

But I don't like them adding racing suits and helmets, when they could be perhaps providing some grid start seasonals for instance. Or even better the option to qualify which seems an unforgivable ommission in a racing game.

This is not the situation. So, no, I don't agree that Kaz and PD have lost it, that they don't listen to fan reaction - and crap, this is freaking obvious. I also don't agree with how bad GT5 is. You race other games. When I race, it's only in GT5, at least right now. GT5 doesn't meet your needs. It meets mine. Not perfectly, but well enough to put a smile on my face when I tear around the Nurb in any number of cars I own. The AI is good enough to put up the fight necessary to make me try and outgun them, so I don't need to race online, and haven't for months. Maybe you think I'm "wrong" for thinking this way, but I wasn't put on this earth to think everything you say is right or smart or valid.

I just think it could be much better. Criticism is a good thing. When they are sitting there deciding what features to prioritise in GT6 I want them to consider improving the AI and and the other things I don't like about the game above racing shoes and free roaming.

If they judged the popularity on sales alone, they might think they had made the perfect game. Unfortunately sales are like box office figures they take your money before you can evaluate if you got your money's worth

Maybe you guys think it's insulting that we like GT5 and still admire Kaz and PD. Maybe you think it's hurting the cause of making Gran Turismo a better game.

Yes I do because any sensible developer has a listen to what people thnk of their last release to find out what they can improve on to increase sales for the next version. You personally have certainly criticised GT5 in the past, but there are many others on here who leap into any debate that looks like it might level some criticism at GT5 and repeat ad-nauseum how perfect it is.

This is a forum, a place for public expression & discussion. You realise what it would be like here if all of us who are less than happy with the current version of GT did just give up & go away? Take a look at the Shift forum & you'll see how quiet it gets when the developer gives up on supporting the game.

As I said earlier...

All the while PD are continuing to provide updates to the game I will continue to discuss what areas I personally would like to see improved

Well, last I checked, a patch was just released, and additional patches and content are coming in the next few months. The team has been working on something. If it's not what you want, oh well. Last I checked, no game company asked me what I wanted their game to be. In fact, in the case of Turn 10 and Eutechnyx, I was frankly told to be quiet. Make of this what you will.

Thank you PD for continuing to update the game. Please consider adding qualifying and improve the AI before adding racing shoes or new horns.


Tenacious D
Asking for things to be improved without adding in "And by the way, Kaz/PD/GT5 sux" shouldn't be too hard for you guys.


Herein lies the problem with these threads. This community is already polarised and instead of people responding to individual posts on their own merits (I'm not accusing you specifically of this), some people respond to the whole gestalt of people with an opposing view. Generalising and lumping every criticism into the camp of 'complainers'.

When I look at the posts criticising GT5 I am constantly amazed by the variety of opinions and I disagree with many of them. The only thing that annoys me are the 'empty' posts saying get over it or specious arguments such as "it's not a racing game, it's the real driving simulator - look on the box" used to counter valid criticisms.
 
Last edited:
I have to agree with mr serious about asking for features/improvements.

Whilst PD are supporting the game with patches/updates no one has a right to criticise anyone elses wishes/hopes.

When PD pull the plug and move on then yes. Tell the people to move on and stop moaning.
 
All I hear is "GT5 has all these things I don't like about it." Sometimes this includes, "I'm done with GT5, I'm done with GT, and I'm done with Playstation." Gee, how constructive is that in the pursuit of improving Gran Turismo? What does bailing accomplish?

Seeing how many MORONIC replies complaint threads get telling people to sell gt5 and move on, then this comment is equally moronic.

What has made me give up on GT5 is the cretins who defend this game to the hilt and seem so unsympathetic to those who have legitimate complaints. Often comparing complaints to "asking for the moon", Most complaint threads I read ask for decent things and wonder why PD made some frankly ridiculous design decisions.

So you want to ask what does alienating a large proportion of some of GTs biggest supporters has accomplished.

Seriously people here are shooting themselves in the foot.
 
I didn't mean support them financially, I meant do you still agree with what they've done

See this makes sense and is true there are people that support them but don't agree with the fifth installment of the GT series, and only want them to do better when GT6 comes closer to us.
 
Seeing how many MORONIC replies complaint threads get telling people to sell gt5 and move on, then this comment is equally moronic.

What has made me give up on GT5 is the cretins who defend this game to the hilt and seem so unsympathetic to those who have legitimate complaints. Often comparing complaints to "asking for the moon", Most complaint threads I read ask for decent things and wonder why PD made some frankly ridiculous design decisions.

So you want to ask what does alienating a large proportion of some of GTs biggest supporters has accomplished.

Seriously people here are shooting themselves in the foot.

Did anyone see the BBC documentary called Secrets Of the Superbrands? One section offers a potential insight as to why anyone who criticises GT5 comes under fire from a certain section of the forum.

This short article discusses the relevant section of the documentary here
http://news4geeks.net/2011/05/21/ap...o-religious-devotion-according-to-scientists/
 
Last edited:
Considering the entire pd team is made up of about 150 people, and the fact that most of them arent modelers, thats not so pitiful. They had to design the entire car inside and out, model all the nuts and bolts, the interior design, and all that, and it had to actually look like the car; i cant even draw a car that looks real! I dont know about you but thats a pretty tall order for less than 100 people, and add the tracks on top of that. I admit 4-6 years is a bit... Lengthy, but certainly not pitiful

Yes agreed it's a tall order but why not higher people that can do this correctly? I can draw a car that looks real, it's a major hobby of mine. Also I'm not sure about you but I think Sony should have helped the PD team, especially with a series that is a major money maker for the company.

It's not 6 years really. It's ongoing. There still making it.

Not sure what context your speaking for, but you make a great point for either side of the debate. At the end of the day when GT6 arrives, people will say GT5 was poor due to how much development it still require after it was put out to the public. However, those for GT5 will say that's what made it worked, they demonstrated how much info they could add to the game after the fact and improved it further to be a contender for best GT game. I tend to see it as the prior rather than the later.

Hence the "should Polyphony hire more people" thread.

As a consumer, they are a "company" to me, as they should be to everyone that has no financial interest (real money, not internet talk), if a company has demand for increased output, smart money expands, this has already been thoroughly discussed, so I won't go into great detail.

Long story short - I'm a consumer, company demands are not of great importance to me unless I work for said company - another long story short - If your company is to small (despite being the biggest racing franchise in ever) to keep up with the extra work modern tech requires, expand.

And that's how we get back to 200 cars, 10 tracks in 4 (6) years.

I think they should have hired more people especially when considering how much money they'd make when released. Companies do have analyst for this and I'm sure Sony knew it would be big hence why they most likely pushed PD for the release. However, Sony should have given PD more people to help from the get go and maybe we wouldn't have this issue.
 
Nobody's perfect. No game developer is perfect, and one will be even less so with the recently added stress of moving house.

Of course I support PD, Gran Turismo has been a significant part of my leisure-time life since 1998. Yes, 5 has some holes. I'm sure they'll patch them all sooner or later. I'm just thankful I'm still able to play online!
 
Did anyone see the BBC documentary called Secrets Of the Superbrands? One section offers a potential insight as to why anyone who criticises GT5 comes under fire from a certain section of the forum.

This short article discusses the relevant section of the documentary here
http://news4geeks.net/2011/05/21/ap...o-religious-devotion-according-to-scientists/

Oh my.......That's actually quite worrying. But you are spot on. If I change every mention of GT5 in complaint threads to "jesus" or "mohammed" then certain replies do indeed come across as those "devout". (I'm hoping no one does a facetious comment about "jesus having unrealistic tyre wear")

The way even the mildest criticism get's these sorts mashing the keyboards and slavering at the mouths.
 
If you were completely devoted to something, if you loved it so much (and weren't afraid of it), surely you'd not be afraid of doing what YOU can to improve it? Eg. A customer providing feedback to the producer via e-mail...

COMPLAINING and WHINGING are two very different things.
 
The problem is that too many of you think that those of us who aren't incessantly complaining are stupid.

You both must have missed my bullet point on how long the game has been out. This isn't January. The game has been out for nearly a year now. Complaining about the same things over and over ad harfium is seriously old. Complaining about them even more will change nothing. You guys act like the amount of grumping will result in something. Like if you whine to your mom enough, eventually you can get her to do anything you want.

Creating a game of the scope of GT5 from scratch takes time. Lots of time. Six man-months per car, up to two-man years per track. Have you done the math on that? And no, I'm Standards of either.

Saying that Forza has a "sweeping variety of cars" is really pushing the bounds of definition. They have a lot of supercars, muscle cars and race cars, in fact, about as many as GT4 has. Maybe a few more. If you want a game with true car variety, that's Gran Turismo, bar none. If you think GT has too many dinkmobiles, that may be true, but I prefer GT5's stable to Forza 3's.

And you ask what GT5 has that no other game has. I'll tell you.

It gives me the opportunity to virtually own hundreds of cars I can't get in any other game, and put me in them like no other can. And make them all fun. No, I'm not a cockpit guy, obviously, but that's my choice. It has a near perfect Nurburgring. It has a number of things I love that you guys poo-poo. Forza 3 is pretty good, but other than the livery editor they do about as well as anyone else, which just doesn't satisfy me. And the flaws in F3 had me drop the game after two months, never to return. But I'll be racing GT5 until GT6 comes out, even with the release of Forza 4.

You may find it odd that we don't get as sore as you guys do over the game. You may hate the fact that we don't recycle the same complaints for almost a year now. Well, we understand that saying the same things a few times is enough for most normal humans. We see that PD is listening. We move on and wait for the changes. You may call us lemmings. Whatever. We're not hung up on a board for nine months repeating the same things endlessly. We're racing and enjoying ourselves, which last time I checked is the whole point of a game. If you just can't enjoy GT5, I guess it's time to ignore you.

Tenacious D, by sweeping we mean manufactures even if it is one car to the name they have a great deal of manufactures on the equal or to the cusp of GT. Let's not quickly forget that GTs claim to fame for having so many cars is because of how many similar or exact same models of Japanese cars they have. Not too many people know about the Morgan Aero, but many will now thanks to FM4. The problems we complain about are still relevant, so not sure how your saying we're talking about issues that were major in January as if they still are now. I am not saying that! I still play the game and see every update and know what is fixed and what isn't and what is added and what still isn't. Once again we don't live under a rock, what do you like that I supposedly loathe on the game? You go out on some personal attack, as if we're insulting your intelligence because you wont see it our way, but in reality you're blowing it up as if we're trying to change GT5 and your train of thought. That is an assumption on your part and I've said several times but will remind you again I only hope for a great GT6. This doesn't mean I don't support PD but just think GT5 could have been better and it's not a fringe group that agrees. You go on saying that you somehow understand things after said a few times and obviously I've had to rehash this several times because you don't understand. Please I ask you to inform me and everyone else that disagrees what we are repeating about, you say this over and over in your argumentation but never show the slightest example or demonstration of what that is instead of being vague.

I too am racing like I've said, I also am in several GTP tournaments on GT5 that I participate in. The idea that I just sit cross legged in my chair at home is weird…especially considering that I have a life outside of GTP and GT5 and tend not to post here for many lengths at a time. So the last bit of your argument is more emotional draw than anything else really, pure assumption really. People are essentially saying that GT5 screwed up from the get go, doesn't make much sense why seeing the other massively developed games that don't need updates once or twice a month a year after it was put out. Most normal humans do complain about same issues, especially when they're not fixed…guess you haven't' read much about politics but when people invest time and money into things they don’t want a diminishing return, which is what some of us feel to have received.

I've agreed with you on several points and so have other opposite of you, yet you ignore that on your response back and go on some directive as if we never agreed with you. Other games have let you own hundreds of cars and performed to the expectations they were given by the company that made them…GT1-GT4 are obvious games, so was FM-FM3 and soon FM4. Just saying you villainies us yet we agree with you on various points, not sure how that works. Dinkmobiles…not sure what those are but I have an idea and that comment isn't really called for.

So I did your math on the car for the six "man" months it would take…the problem is the number gives more than how many cars they have considering how many years the game was in works, as well as the number of employees. So I broke it down further and still got more even if only 100 or 80 which is slightly under the mark of cars that we have. However, you begin to take in variables like number of cars that look alike and probably didn't need a major redo do to being so similar, yet you cant count that variable. Also as CSL pointed out and others you have tracks which there are variations to many of them, so it is unlikely their QC (Quality Control) would make them spend time- especially if we're to believe your time frames- doing a similar track all over when minor things would be taken out. Once again where are you getting your math from, or was it all hypothetical?

Did anyone see the BBC documentary called Secrets Of the Superbrands? One section offers a potential insight as to why anyone who criticises GT5 comes under fire from a certain section of the forum.

This short article discusses the relevant section of the documentary here
http://news4geeks.net/2011/05/21/ap...o-religious-devotion-according-to-scientists/

This makes a lot of sense and I'm glad you brought it up. This shows in a scientific light to what people tend to be doing here by fighting for PD, just because the perception of their image seems to have change from early 00s to now. I've played the game since number 1 back in the mid 90s as a kid and an avid but growing car lover. However, rationally looking at this game compared to those before it, there are significant flaws that weren't seen in the games before it. Now there is a lot of new stuff but it is some of the old stuff that they even messed up on, items they've been familiar with doing for a decade plus now. I totally agree with your comment and the article but it wont change much I'm afraid.

If you were completely devoted to something, if you loved it so much (and weren't afraid of it), surely you'd not be afraid of doing what YOU can to improve it? Eg. A customer providing feedback to the producer via e-mail...

COMPLAINING and WHINGING are two very different things.

It's funny you say that cause I asked Sony U.S.A through email how to do this and I was told and also used their system to give feedback and have done so. If I have the emails still I'd be willing to show you that some of us complainers aren't whining, but debating the issues. So yes they are two different things for sure, but haven't seen anyone one here go all caps and say I want new cars now PD. When it does happen though that will be the day we have people whining in the forums over this issues. The people complaining openly here, think that doing so is going to catch the eye of PD, and this is justified seeing as it is only the biggest news outlet on GT next to the PD website and Sony.
 
So people don't like it?

This started as a rebuttal attempt on how it's realistic to be in GT5.
You finished it with the realization, that in any scenario, unlimited entry races suck, whether in a game or in real life, to the point where only amatures on low budgets looking for a race track experience are willing to do it, as all the professionals have better things to do.

You're right, it has no place in a "driving simulator" or "racing game" that has any focus on realism, which was GT's claim to fame.

No, it didn't. It wasn't a (direct) rebuttal at all, it was an example of how one man's definition of "sim" will always be "wrong" on some level to other people.

Open-class racing is a real thing, it does happen and it was once very prevalent.
At some point in history, cars began to exceed the limits of the humans piloting them. That's why open class racing isn't around in the top levels any more. It has nothing to do with "having better things to do". It's still going in the amateur levels because they generally don't have the money etc. to make an absolute all-conquering beast, so it's still fairly constrained in that manner and competition is still close-ish. I guarantee you, if the top teams were given a chance to show what they can really do, they would snatch at it given the opportunity for "reward". Red Bull X2010, for instance.
PD did, but there's no reason to assume that they had to; and considering there have been flawless PSP/PS2 ports since the PSP launched there's no reason PD should have assumed that no one else could have done it, either.

OK. But the argument was that GTPSP ate into GT5's development time. You have to wonder precisely why it wasn't outsourced when so many other PSP titles were, and to quote you, were "flawless ports" - quite the miracle in itself, unless you meant "flaw-preserving ports", of course. :sly:

It might be fun to chip away at the technicalities and form splinter arguments, but you're not really changing the underlying issue: GTPSP got in the way, for whatever reason, for however long, and Kaz regretted it.
 
OK. But the argument was that GTPSP ate into GT5's development time. You have to wonder precisely why it wasn't outsourced when so many other PSP titles were, and to quote you, were "flawless ports" - quite the miracle in itself, unless you meant "flaw-preserving ports", of course. :sly:

It might be fun to chip away at the technicalities and form splinter arguments, but you're not really changing the underlying issue: GTPSP got in the way, for whatever reason, for however long, and Kaz regretted it.

Then GT5 should have been in development for another year maybe. This way there would have been less problems, more content and less complaints.

It is the duty of a company to plan their ressources and the time they need to complete a task/product. It should not end as a problem for the customer. PD could not do that for GT5.

On the other hand (I have GTPSP too), GTPSP had more or less just downgraded tracks from GT5 and/or GT4. They had nothing to built new, just some new standard cars to model. I believe that GTPSP was more parallel to the GT5 development and should not be an excuse for problems with GT5.

I bet they where too "proud" to give some "inferior" studio the task to model premiums or develop GT PSP for them. In the end it is a lose situation for the customer to live with the problems and lack of content.

The biggest problem is the diversity in quality that just feel wrong.

There are so many good cars that are standard, which you cant enjoy really, if you are used to cockpit or next-gen models.
 
GT PSP was a disaster and Polyphony should never have made it. Kaz should have had the foresight to realise that such an insignificant game did not need to be made by Polyphony. Indeed, after two years it's barely sold 2 million copies.

And Kaz even said himself that there were times when most of the studio's attention was on GT PSP. This is terrible studio management, especially when Sony have plenty of utility studios who could have looked after GT PSP.

If Polyphony end up making the Vita game then they're just making the same mistake again. Evolution, Studio Liverpool, Bend Studio...Sony have a few portable studios who could work on it.

Let's have Polyphony put all their weight behind GT6. No portable games, no Prologues, no "experiments", no nothing. Just the whole team working on one project - GT6. A novel concept, huh?
 
GT PSP was a disaster and Polyphony should never have made it. Kaz should have had the foresight to realise that such an insignificant game did not need to be made by Polyphony. Indeed, after two years it's barely sold 2 million copies.

And Kaz even said himself that there were times when most of the studio's attention was on GT PSP. This is terrible studio management, especially when Sony have plenty of utility studios who could have looked after GT PSP.

If Polyphony end up making the Vita game then they're just making the same mistake again. Evolution, Studio Liverpool, Bend Studio...Sony have a few portable studios who could work on it.

Let's have Polyphony put all their weight behind GT6. No portable games, no Prologues, no "experiments", no nothing. Just the whole team working on one project - GT6. A novel concept, huh?

I think that says more about PSP games sales than GTPSP, really... indeed, it's the 5th best selling PSP game and has sold half as many as the most popular PSP Game Monster Hunter Portable 3rd, which sells ridiculous numbers along with PSP units in Japan.

No, I disagree, if PD make a Vita game they need to comitt 100% to it, not just make it a side game in the series. The Vita is more than capable of producing a true Gran Turismo experience and porting premium cars from GT5 will be a lot easier than porting standard cars from GT4 to GT5.
 
Yet you spend time refuting it, yet another old, tired attempt at a "rebuttal". Try to make fun of people for doing exactly what you're also doing. 👍

Writing a 2 minute post is hardly wasting my time (my employers perhaps). I am not making fun of anyone. I just do not understand why people have to write one giant paragraph after another over a video game.
 
When I look at the posts criticising GT5 I am constantly amazed by the variety of opinions and I disagree with many of them. The only thing that annoys me are the 'empty' posts saying get over it or specious arguments such as "it's not a racing game, it's the real driving simulator - look on the box" used to counter valid criticisms.
Above this, all I can say is a string of "Oh well"s. But for this, both sides are about as empty. And I think the reason you see so many "Get over it or move on" posts is because people are tired of the whining. I'm hoping you've seen the posts that read, "Criticizing is one thing, complaining and flaming is another." I've made a few you might have missed. ;)

We can only be grateful that the grouchy threads have mostly died. Grouchy, mind you.

You go out on some personal attack, as if we're insulting your intelligence because you wont see it our way, but in reality you're blowing it up as if we're trying to change GT5 and your train of thought. That is an assumption on your part and I've said several times but will remind you again I only hope for a great GT6. This doesn't mean I don't support PD but just think GT5 could have been better and it's not a fringe group that agrees. You go on saying that you somehow understand things after said a few times and obviously I've had to rehash this several times because you don't understand. Please I ask you to inform me and everyone else that disagrees what we are repeating about, you say this over and over in your argumentation but never show the slightest example or demonstration of what that is instead of being vague.
You have completely misread my posts, as has this miscreant:

Seeing how many MORONIC replies complaint threads get telling people to sell gt5 and move on, then this comment is equally moronic.

What has made me give up on GT5 is the cretins who defend this game to the hilt and seem so unsympathetic to those who have legitimate complaints. Often comparing complaints to "asking for the moon", Most complaint threads I read ask for decent things and wonder why PD made some frankly ridiculous design decisions.

So you want to ask what does alienating a large proportion of some of GTs biggest supporters has accomplished.

Seriously people here are shooting themselves in the foot.
Yes you are, and thank you for COMPLETELY missing every point I made. You seem to be the posterboy of glossing.

This is what I'm talking about. A GOOD NUMBER of the people who have made a complaint about the odd headscratching features in GT5 end up like this grump and become derogatory when we wave them off and say we've heard it a million times now. ALL threads get derailed because criticism and debate quickly falls into a swamp of heated arguing and name-calling. I propose that this is exactly why there are no SONY or Polyphony people here to have to deal with these knot-heads. I wouldn't do it, because I just don't have the patience to deal with rabble who only post to cheeze people off.

Show me one recent civil criticism thread. Heck, find any such thread. I have seen them, but man are they buried and short.

the argument was that GTPSP ate into GT5's development time. You have to wonder precisely why it wasn't outsourced when so many other PSP titles were, and to quote you, were "flawless ports" - quite the miracle in itself, unless you meant "flaw-preserving ports", of course. :sly:

It might be fun to chip away at the technicalities and form splinter arguments, but you're not really changing the underlying issue: GTPSP got in the way, for whatever reason, for however long, and Kaz regretted it.
Then GT5 should have been in development for another year maybe. This way there would have been less problems, more content and less complaints.
You obviously don't remember the angry despair of 2009-2010.

I bet they where too "proud" to give some "inferior" studio the task to model premiums or develop GT PSP for them. In the end it is a lose situation for the customer to live with the problems and lack of content.
This is exactly the problem, as deep_sky says:

GT PSP was a disaster and Polyphony should never have made it. Kaz should have had the foresight to realise that such an insignificant game did not need to be made by Polyphony. Indeed, after two years it's barely sold 2 million copies.

And Kaz even said himself that there were times when most of the studio's attention was on GT PSP. This is terrible studio management, especially when Sony have plenty of utility studios who could have looked after GT PSP.
People ignore the matter that SONY wanted a killer app to make the PSP Go attractive - PSP too, or that the game was a free download if you bought a PSP Go. Kaz insisted that Polyphony produce it, which he wanted to do after GT5 was out, but the Go was going to be in production within a year or so, so they had to scramble. Hey, it was a mess, but that sort of thing happens in the gaming biz.

I have to say though that I still want to see a GT6 Prologue. ;)
 
Last edited:
Back