Do you still support PD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tecknical
  • 700 comments
  • 33,745 views
I said it in the other thread, but I find it more related to this thread, this super-quick fix 1.12 gives me the first honest faith that PD is starting to get the point.
Just fantastic that they fixed the "two steps back" so quickly this time around, bravo. 👍

Now if only I could write my thoughts as well as SlipZtrEm. :lol: Excellent post.
 
FINALLY!!! thank you sir for this, finally someone with more researched knowledge out there that speaks it like it is. Just cause we have constructive criticism doesn't mean we don't like PD or the GT series, we have just expected more from them at this stage in their life. Once again thank you!

I expected a Gran Turismo .. Not 1 gt ever had everything I wanted. NO game ever had everything I wanted.I just dont understand how to some people treat gt5 like it is the only game to have faults .. Like saying pd is dead or your never supporting a gt blah blah Im just saying most of the crap is not that major but just pety crap that updates are for and not major enough to make me not support pd
Thing is this GT is just like every other gt and it sucks they have to suffer because your hopes were set too high
Dont get me wrong my hopes were set so high too I thought standards would have cockpit til a few days before release lol.I thought alot more cars would be premium I thought we would have more customizing options .. I can go on for ever but it seems like .. A few realize this is basically what GranTurismo is and always will be. If you want this to be anything different nobody's stopping you from playing another game.
Im not expecting gt to be the only racing I need because it never was .. I always had a NFS or a PGR etc. for the things GT didnt offer and vice versa. Its the exact same now
GT will always be my favorite racing game until i find another game where I can take a ford taurus around the green hell
Like me and a heap of other people are saying a lot of you want gt to be something its not
Im not a fanboy or nothing I dont care if you dont like the game I can respect the complaints and critics
 
I expected a Gran Turismo .. Not 1 gt ever had everything I wanted. NO game ever had everything I wanted.I just dont understand how to some people treat gt5 like it is the only game to have faults .. Like saying pd is dead or your never supporting a gt blah blah Im just saying most of the crap is not that major but just pety crap that updates are for and not major enough to make me not support pd
Thing is this GT is just like every other gt and it sucks they have to suffer because your hopes were set too high
Dont get me wrong my hopes were set so high too I thought standards would have cockpit til a few days before release lol.I thought alot more cars would be premium I thought we would have more customizing options .. I can go on for ever but it seems like .. A few realize this is basically what GranTurismo is and always will be. If you want this to be anything different nobody's stopping you from playing another game.
Im not expecting gt to be the only racing I need because it never was .. I always had a NFS or a PGR etc. for the things GT didnt offer and vice versa. Its the exact same now
GT will always be my favorite racing game until i find another game where I can take a ford taurus around the green hell
Like me and a heap of other people are saying a lot of you want gt to be something its not
Im not a fanboy or nothing I dont care if you dont like the game I can respect the complaints and critics

Yeah every GT had all that I wanted, well to be quite honest except for GT3 when they took out Muscle cars (I think that was the one). Yet most have had everything I wanted and even GT3 made up with it for have F1 cars, which was brilliant. My hopes and the hopes of others -cause it's obvious I'm not the only one but I get picked by people- was for a game that they said they'd give us; one with damage, cockpits, and obviously more cars, and better a.i. as well as physics. Yet with each passed deadline we'd find out that it was more defined not as broad as expected or first hinted. I was happy when I found out a new GT game was coming and if they hadn't told us anything but a new game with a 1000+ cars I'd have nothing to complain about. However, they did hype it up for us and we found out after that they were pushed for a deadline on a game they wanted to spend another 2 years on that would have been what everyone wanted I suspect.

The point everyone is missing is there should be no updates they should have got the bugs fixed from the get go, from the LSD FF bug to the transmission bug...these are items they've worked on for the past 15 years on other GT games yet this one has to have a patch to work unlike the past games? I could care less about the cars and tracks, a functioning game is what I complain about. Yes it's getting fixed but it feels like I bought a car and it's getting put together after I've given my hard earned money. The paint chips and all that stuff is just petty crap, I agree. I'm not sure if you're just directing this to me in your opening or what but I can only assume since you quoted me; I never said GT or PD is crap and that I've given up all hope on them, I just find this a short coming compared to the other games they made. If you've read anything I put down you'd see that I love PD as much as those supporting GT5, yet rationally I don't see what there is to rave about. Not to contradict myself but the only thing about cars I cared about was more modern cars with the majority being stuck in the early to mid 00s with only a handful of 08-10. However, as I also said in other post they may have not got the full licenses on this game and ran into trouble the car and track deal isn't entirely PDs fault when you think about it.
 
nope, its not a load glitch, i wish i could have this car again (i sold it for obviously reasons) , dont remember the version of this legacy,

Subaru LEGACY B4 2.0GT '03
Subaru LEGACY B4 2.0GT spec.B '03
Subaru LEGACY B4 3.0R '03

Subaru LEGACY B4 Blitzen '00
Subaru LEGACY B4 RSK '98
ill try to find it again, but this is a real model of the game, not a bug or glitch.

edit: here it is, in dark blue looks better, but you can see the same model,

http://www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=33441&PHPSESSID=4c583942be8cdb5e3062128abebf973a&width=1024

i cant take some pics, i have it in portable garage (green colour).
We are well aware that the car looks like crap. But let me repeat this again for you: It. Is. A. Glitch.

The 2.0GT is literally the exact same model as the Spec B, and the 2.0GT doesn't look anywhere near as poorly rendered as the Spec B. The Spec B didn't look anywhere near that bad back when it was featured in GT4. And finally, there are several other cars that suffered from the same problem but were fixed through patches, as well as several other cars that still have those problems (ie. having lower quality meshes and textures than they did in GT4) that PD still need to fix.



PD screwed up the LoD settings for the car. They did it for several others as well. This is not news. It has been known since the game came out that some of the Standards looked worse in GT5 than they used to in previous games because of it, and PD have been slowly fixing them since 1.06. It is a bug in the game, and once PD fix it the car will look fine.
 
A few realize this is basically what GranTurismo is and always will be. If you want this to be anything different nobody's stopping you from playing another game.
GT became what it is today because people loved the realism.
Read...

NA
Q: If you evaluate all these points how well does GT5 simulate racing?
A: Well if you want all of that stuff then go play one of the SimBin games.

So now we've gone from the common retort of "If you want some arcade racer with blah blah features, go buy product X" to "If you want properly simulated racing with blah blah features, go buy product Y".
The fact that we've gotten to the point that the argument for seemingly everything is now "go buy another companies product" is exactly why PD and Sony have comunicated more in the last 10 months about GT5's future than they have in the five years prior, and have made a definite effort to respond dirrectly to complaints. Where before there was hype, now there is substance, even two way comunication to an extent, even if it's still not at the level that some would want.
To some, continued discussion may be beating a dead horse, but to Sony/PD it's obviously been a tool of market research and a source of motivation to demonstrate that they are listening to constructive opinions, wishies, and/or mindless complaints, depending on individual perspective as to which is which.
Do we need to rehash the same silly is it a driving game, is it a racing game, is it a car museum, is it a rearview mirror decoration for your Yugo arguments? Probably not. But the underlying topics that often lead to the aforemention silliness are often very valid. Just because some people have to turn it into silly BS every time, untill a thread is reduced to worthless arguments about things like who's idea of the game is more correct than anothers, doesn't make the underlining debate moot. Continuing to assault such discussions by turning them to debates of purely personal opinions of things like personal notions of Kaz's vision or what GT has been or is ment to be, often making use of talking points not even really having any true bearring to the base disscussions in the process, maintaining as if said uttered opinions automatically quallify as inarguable fact, and doing so has a means to try and defeat any attempt at other's constructive criticisms amongst themselves, now thats a dead horse that gets beat waaaaaay past the point of pointless. Fact is, PD is listening, Sony is watching, debates will continue as long has people still get the feeling that they are being heard. The point of doing so is self evident in that regards.

The only GT game that really "let me down" before was GT3, which had some of the same issues, specifically, not enough content to keep me entertained as long as previous GT's.

But GT5, literally, has nothing new I really care about.
Better graphics and physics come with a new platform, as do "premiums", these are all things that basically can't be avoided, it happens with every new system, graphics improve, and physics get better.

Being able to paint is awesome, and 10 years overdue, but they even fudged that up, RM's are great, but they existed 13 years ago, only to be removed at many players dismay for no known reason. So again, nothing new there. Online play is here, (finally) as it was with GT5P, but yet again, something that could have been in GT4.

So of the few "new" things I like, 1 is screwed up for unknown reasons and was 10 years overdue, 1 isn't new at all, just finally returned, another is not really "new" since GT5P had it, and again, should have probably been there for GT4.
The tuning "system" started out legendary in GT1, and from I've read of realistic spec in FM3, Forza has them killed in that aspect. Why? Because PD hasn't been changing the game for some time now, it's been petty improvement over petty improvement, time and time again, the other games sustained, but it's gotten to the point where it'd ridiculous, they haven't really changed this game at all in at least 10 years, some aspects longer.

If it weren't for seasonals and updates, this game would have been done for me a long time ago, and that's not good for PD. Losing any customer is not good for PD.
 
LOL
What do you mean there should be no updates ?
If the other gt was able to get updates they wouldve
Same for like every other game ever made..
The only thing thats short coming from other gts are the amount of races .. That I notice.
gt5 has pretty much everything every other gt has and then some minus a few tracks and cars and tuning options
I didnt see PD hyping anything personally it was mainly gaming sites I saw. And a lot was mistranslated

And yea mainly the first sentence was towards you the rest was just in general
 
^^ agree with CLS . Where PD let me down was the lack of customisation, lack of A spec events but most of all a lack of proper racing AI.

For those of us who rarely venture online there is little wheel to wheel racing in the game. I cant see any improvement in this aspect since GT4.

For me the game has no longevity , if it wasnt for tuning and the occasional seasonal event I would rarely play GT5.

I support the idea of GT5 as for supporting PD no I generally dont support companies and PD have dropped the ball in many aspects IMO.
 
GT became what it is today because people loved the realism.
Read...

Okay I dont know that this has to do with the point I was making lol
But I agree thats 1 reason ..

Edit : and i would DO things to Demi
 
Last edited:
LOL
What do you mean there should be no updates ?
If the other gt was able to get updates they wouldve
Same for like every other game ever made..
The only thing thats short coming from other gts are the amount of races .. That I notice.
gt5 has pretty much everything every other gt has and then some minus a few tracks and cars and tuning options
I didnt see PD hyping anything personally it was mainly gaming sites I saw. And a lot was mistranslated

And yea mainly the first sentence was towards you the rest was just in general

There are a few things they still can't get right and most games don't have nearly as many patches as GT5 does. So to say that this is normal is a joke. What about the A.I. system, this is part of the dead horse thing I'll agree but if your going to defend GT be willing to recognize their faults and say that at some point they need to get it together, especially after such durations of time. The A.I system has been a big critical point in reviews GT5 is no different sadly and it doesn't seem patches are fixing it. This in no way shape or form makes me hate PD just dissapoints me, and yes I will be playing another game but as a customer I think I have the right to complain so we have a much smoother and consumer friendly GT6.

Yet next month I will be playing F1 2011 and FM4

You're obviously not going to agree with any of us no matter what facts are brought up to debunk your idea, I mean with CSL that is the first thing I've seen you agree with. It's fine tough your opinion and thanks for the debate 👍
 
Okay I dont know that this has to do with the point I was making lol
But I agree thats 1 reason ..
Because it used to be occasional people complaining GT5 was to sim like, and they were told, "sorry, GT isn't NFS", and that was pretty much that.
Now, the retort for almost everything is "go buy something else if you want simulation".
When the hell did that happen, and where was I? GT was always the best console sim on the planet in my eyes, at least through GT4, but now, if I dare ask for the game to be more realistic, everyone says "GT5 is not a racing sim, go buy something else".

Well say what you will, GT sure as hell used to be a "sim", and not a "driving game" as many try to claim it is now.

The sad part is, because of how so many things in GT5 are, I can't completely hold it on the people thinking it's not really a racing game, because even though it clearly is a racing game, the only "racing" to be had is online, or by yourself, because the AI, even if you're slow enough to be side-by-side with them, or using an under powered car, just hog the middle of the track between turns, and will plow you if you don't get 100% past them in time, they may as well be blocks on the road that move around trying to crash you or get in your way. This may have been okay at one time, game systems didn't have the power they do now, but in 2010, just like everything else in the game, it's just.... old.

PD needs a "reinvent" of all the critical details, I don't care if they have barbie suits, hell they can implement "cruises" like Kaz mentioned before, they can put everything in the world in, but without updating the critical features of gameplay, it's bound to die, that's business 101 - change with the times or end up like the record stores.

Edit : and i would DO things to Demi
If you'd asked who it was you wouldn't be the first. :lol:
 
There are a few things they still can't get right and most games don't have nearly as many patches as GT5 does. So to say that this is normal is a joke. What about the A.I. system, this is part of the dead horse thing I'll agree but if your going to defend GT be willing to recognize their faults and say that at some point they need to get it together, especially after such durations of time. The A.I system has been a big critical point in reviews GT5 is no different sadly and it doesn't seem patches are fixing it. This in no way shape or form makes me hate PD just dissapoints me, and yes I will be playing another game but as a customer I think I have the right to complain so we have a much smoother and consumer friendly GT6.

Yet next month I will be playing F1 2011 and FM4

Well you said it he wanted another 2 years on the game so that could be a reason for all the updates.I dont have a problem with the AI anymore the 1.10 update I think that made them "punks" sucked but prior to that I had no problems with it.Yea its not competitive but Gt was never really competitive to me.
I notice the faults and im mad at the potential they never take advantage of like every other gt.which is why i play different racing games for stuff gt dont offer. I dont know what faults you speak of but youd have to be blind to not notice any.
I dont know where or what exactly it is that they need to get together..
A line of events happening one after the other caused delays with weekly seasonals thats the only thing I really noticed that they cant seem to get together
Glitches come with games the bigger the game the more glitches. Hell some games dont even update to fix glitches
 
Well you said it he wanted another 2 years on the game so that could be a reason for all the updates.I dont have a problem with the AI anymore the 1.10 update I think that made them "punks" sucked but prior to that I had no problems with it.Yea its not competitive but Gt was never really competitive to me.
I notice the faults and im mad at the potential they never take advantage of like every other gt.which is why i play different racing games for stuff gt dont offer. I dont know what faults you speak of but youd have to be blind to not notice any.
I dont know where or what exactly it is that they need to get together..
A line of events happening one after the other caused delays with weekly seasonals thats the only thing I really noticed that they cant seem to get together
Glitches come with games the bigger the game the more glitches. Hell some games dont even update to fix glitches

I agree with you big games come with big glitches, but when you have the same glitches from prior released games...or go back two steps from your prolouge you have to really stop and think about what your trying to accomplish. I don't have the ability to play other great racing games but I'm trying to play more iracing and I hope rfactor2 comes out soon so I can get a true race fix. I will have a better fix with F1 2011
 
^ Yea I agree I actually enjoyed prolouge better.Mainly because of the penalty system
and its been ssaid before it was a graphical downgrade from prolouge because it had more stuff in the game
Whats glitches are you talking about tho ?

You're obviously not going to agree with any of us no matter what facts are brought up to debunk your idea, I mean with CSL that is the first thing I've seen you agree with. It's fine tough your opinion and thanks for the debate 👍

Was thisat me ?
I dont even know how to reply ...
1. I only replied on this topic a hand full of times and its been about the same thing ..
2.What Idea ? that people are expecting something GT isnt? some of the stuff ive seen people complaining about will never be in a GT and isnt what GT is "about"
3.Who have i been disagreeing with ?


@cslr yea I dont agree with people when they say go play another game for that reason but its understandble because people get tired of reading the same complaints and complaints in general it makes you want to say just shut up and enjoy the game or play something else but it dont work like that.People have the right to complain if your tired of the complaining ignore it .... thats what ive been doing lol
 
Last edited:
^ Yea I agree I actually enjoyed prolouge better.Mainly because of the penalty system
and its been ssaid before it was a graphical downgrade from prolouge because it had more stuff in the game
Whats glitches are you talking about tho ?



Was thisat me ?
I dont even know how to reply ...
1. I only replied on this topic a hand full of times and its been about the same thing ..
2.What Idea ? that people are expecting something GT isnt? some of the stuff ive seen people complaining about will never be in a GT and isnt what GT is "about"
3.Who have i been disagreeing with ?


@cslr yea I dont agree with people when they say go play another game for that reason but its understandble because people get tired of reading the same complaints and complaints in general it makes you want to say just shut up and enjoy the game or play something else but it dont work like that.People have the right to complain if your tired of the complaining ignore it .... thats what ive been doing lol

The glitches I speak of are like when the game first came out and the tranny couldn't be set up so they had to make a patch for it. This is the first GT game I know of that needed it well first full game. Same with the LSD patch that just came out today. Stuff like this should already be set up so we can test drive our cars to the fullest from day one instead of waiting. I understand lighting, shadow and color touch ups to the game. The last part was mainly to those standing for GT5 as if it is so great or like some dogma they hold, they wont agree with me obviously even though I agree with valid points they have.
 
I wouldnt call the lack of transmission tuning a ' glitch' simply a missing feature (at release). Agreed on the rest.
 
I have come to realise that the question is not Do you still support PD, but rather Do you still trust PD?

And for me, the answer unfortunately would be no. Sure, hardware permitting I can trust Polyphony to deliver best in class cars models, tracks models, technology and visual effects. But sadly, I just don't trust Polyphony to change their game design to something that is fit fo the modern generation. I don't trust them to add in-depth customisation, modification and tuning options. I would love to be proved wrong. But I was convinced that after GT4, GT5 would be a revolution; something fresh and modern. And it wasn't.

So I don't see why GT6 will any different. Or course, it's subjective as to whether you think "more of the same" is good or bad. But it is quite so very clear that a proportion of people on GTP feel GT is stale and out of date, so I feel it's a valid concern to have.
 
We are well aware that the car looks like crap. But let me repeat this again for you: It. Is. A. Glitch.

The 2.0GT is literally the exact same model as the Spec B, and the 2.0GT doesn't look anywhere near as poorly rendered as the Spec B. The Spec B didn't look anywhere near that bad back when it was featured in GT4. And finally, there are several other cars that suffered from the same problem but were fixed through patches, as well as several other cars that still have those problems (ie. having lower quality meshes and textures than they did in GT4) that PD still need to fix.



PD screwed up the LoD settings for the car. They did it for several others as well. This is not news. It has been known since the game came out that some of the Standards looked worse in GT5 than they used to in previous games because of it, and PD have been slowly fixing them since 1.06. It is a bug in the game, and once PD fix it the car will look fine.

cmon, i have the gt4 , i used to compare cars of gt5 vs cars of gt4, just to see the difference, i compared this model as well, and its the same ugly model, i can take pics (of gt4 obviously) to show you, there are no "loading" glitches, they are just "poor car models", graphics on ps2 can make it look better , but in a close view you can see the poor model.

ill post the pics when i get time.
 
Then take the damn picture. You're completely wrong, so I don't expect you to post in this thread again anyways, but the car is glitched in GT5. Not GT4. I just showed you a picture that proved that, but if you absolutely need to see it for yourself then go right ahead.

Actually, you know what? I'll do it for you.


And it is LoD. Level of Detail. Not "load."




And here you go:

monteasoasfalto12.jpg
img0000hb.jpg


One final time: The. Car. Is. Glitched.

It did not look like it does in GT5 back in GT4. Period.
 
Last edited:
I think most of us on this forum have simple ideas that everyone would love to see in the game and PD won't listen, they think they know what's best or some crap.
 
Not in any way actually.... they listen to Kaz, because Kaz tells them what to do... and what he wants is actually a game according to his specifications, for himself... the sales are just a way of feeding the project.
 
Uh...they've improved alot since FM1 to catch up and be competitive with the GT series. Codemasters and the F1 series so far have catered to the masses, one example is the safety car release for 2011. F1 2010s biggest complaint was lack of safety car, and codemasters listened. Quit with the dogma of GT and try to be tolerant of the other side. I've listened to your views but they've become bias quite obviously toward GT.
  • I didn't say that T10 didn't work to improve Forza. But if you're going to give T10 a pass for issues which have caused board riots in all three games so far, not doing the same for Polyphony and GT5 is hypocritical.
  • I hardly agree that the biggest complaint against F1 2010 was the lack of a safety car. A number of people don't like it for a number of reasons.
  • My "dogma" is to apply the same set of criteria to issues with racers like Forza, which some people here hold up as a model for Polyphony to follow, as if it has no flaws. There are quite a number of issues with the pinnacle Forza 3 which I haven't even mentioned because frankly, I have better things to do than sit on these boards and make a legal case for every argument I see flaws and bias in.
If you think I haven't pointed out any flaws with GT5, kindly find a post in which I said the weird things PD did in GT5 are no big deal. If you're going to accuse me of something, at least offer proof.

Also I'm talking about the points I made, not everyone else...if you look at my questions once again you'll see that. You placed me with everyone else
Not this time, no.

For the bolded part I just did the math for the figures you so confidently gave...from rough estimate the number doesn't add up to the number of years given, thus we should have more. Now that you so cleverly give more info to your argument after the fact you have a point.
I'm not sure what this even means... but thank you for admitting that I can be clever. ;)

But I'm still not sure if you even get the point. Do you know how many modelers there are in Polyphony? Do you know how long they were working on Tourist Trophy and GT PSP? Do you even bother to consider how many cars are in other racers? For instance, in Forza 3 there were around 200 new cars. And these were made with assistance from shops from all over, though mostly from the Orient. If they had help farming this stuff out, why only 200 new cars? Or were they saving them for paid DLC? These models also have inconsistent, buggy behavior, especially when you try to add livery elements in the paint shop. Surfaces can reverse your decals or vinyls, they can distort badly on seams, they push your additions completely off in limbo! Is this no big deal, or is this a bad thing, when this is a bigger part of Forza than a missing safety car? Or an online system which is gimped compared to its predecessor?

Is it biased to bring this up? Or is it biased to gloss over it?

Yes Once again you go on this bit that I don't enjoy the GT series because I see this game as subpar to the last. Sorry I don't share the infatuation of it so blindly, but when you have updates that fixes massive things like the new one for instance...
Uhh.... confused. I think we're speaking different languages or something. Anyhow I'm gonna write some more fiction and then hit GT5 some more while the TV is free.
 
Then take the damn picture. You're completely wrong, so I don't expect you to post in this thread again anyways, but the car is glitched in GT5. Not GT4. I just showed you a picture that proved that, but if you absolutely need to see it for yourself then go right ahead.

Actually, you know what? I'll do it for you.


And it is LoD. Level of Detail. Not "load."




And here you go:


img0000hb.jpg


One final time: The. Car. Is. Glitched.

It did not look like it does in GT5 back in GT4. Period.

My God. That is shocking.
 
Toronado
Yep. Everyone knows that B-Spec Bob Dress Up and collecting car horns are a fundamental part of the GT5 experience.

Ok they might be slightly gimmicks, but not like other games introduce gimmicks.
 

I miss the good old GT4 times. Back then everthing was alright. Bad AI, check. No Ferraris, Check. No online mode, check.

But tons of fun.

I think most fans didn`t asked for much.

I think almost everyone was already pleased with GT5P.

For me it would have been enough to just add new cars and new tracks to GT5P.

No copy pasted cars from GT4/GT3 (i love the CLK DTM, but its model is so horrible)with even worse quality then on PS2 or copy pasted tracks (laguna seca, monaco). No graphical glitches, no stupid X1, no leaderbord glitching.
 

  • But I'm still not sure if you even get the point. Do you know how many modelers there are in Polyphony? Do you know how long they were working on Tourist Trophy and GT PSP? Do you even bother to consider how many cars are in other racers? For instance, in Forza 3 there were around 200 new cars. And these were made with assistance from shops from all over, though mostly from the Orient. If they had help farming this stuff out, why only 200 new cars? Or were they saving them for paid DLC? These models also have inconsistent, buggy behavior, especially when you try to add livery elements in the paint shop. Surfaces can reverse your decals or vinyls, they can distort badly on seams, they push your additions completely off in limbo! Is this no big deal, or is this a bad thing, when this is a bigger part of Forza than a missing safety car? Or an online system which is gimped compared to its predecessor?

    Is it biased to bring this up? Or is it biased to gloss over it?

  • So once again, a comparison to what another company achieved in 2 years, vs what PD accomplished in 4-6 years?
    Ironically some of the issues you list are things PD couldn't be bothered to even attempt to put in their game, while the statement "an online system which is gimped compared to its predecessor" can in many ways also be said of GT5.

    So if you wish to compare apples to apples, try to include timeframe, even if you're stuck on speculation of development time for TT and GTPSP, at the very least it's 4 years development time, though the underlying truth will always be "6 years between GT4 and GT5", no matter how many other games PD makes, it took 6 years from GT4's release date to release GT5's.
 
CSLACR
So once again, a comparison to what another company achieved in 2 years, vs what PD accomplished in 4-6 years?
Ironically some of the issues you list are things PD couldn't be bothered to even attempt to put in their game, while the statement "an online system which is gimped compared to its predecessor" can in many ways also be said of GT5.

So if you wish to compare apples to apples, try to include timeframe, even if you're stuck on speculation of development time for TT and GTPSP, at the very least it's 4 years development time, though the underlying truth will always be "6 years between GT4 and GT5", no matter how many other games PD makes, it took 6 years from GT4's release date to release GT5's.

But that doesn't matter, GT5 wasn't the only game being developed which means they were focusing on TT and GTpsp (as stated before). I agree it still took pretty long for it's release but many people have to realize that in those 5 years they weren't 100% focused on GT5, also not to mention that they're understaffed as it is, plus you have to understand that game devs are human which means they don't base every day of their life developing a game, they need vacation time, time to unwind, spend with family/friends. And what exactly did the other game achieve in 2years? I agree a lot but still not nearly as much detail/content that is in GT5 so it makes sense.
 
But that doesn't matter, GT5 wasn't the only game being developed which means they were focusing on TT and GTpsp (as stated before). I agree it still took pretty long for it's release but many people have to realize that in those 5 years they weren't 100% focused on GT5, also not to mention that they're understaffed as it is, plus you have to understand that game devs are human which means they don't base every day of their life developing a game, they need vacation time, time to unwind, spend with family/friends. And what exactly did the other game achieve in 2years? I agree a lot but still not nearly as much detail/content that is in GT5 so it makes sense.

This is a point I often make. I'm sure Turn 10 is backed by a huge workforce with unlimited resources, but PD is literally an office full of people. Not much to the team or office (if you've ever seen any docs on youtube on PDs headquarters), but they are finally expanding as these projects become more competitive and complex.

Some of the company's time is also spent doing contract work for manufacturers like Nissan. They developed the digital interface for the Nissan GTR and I believe they also help design specific areo parts for Nismo tuned models. Tourist Trophy, GT:PSP, and GT5:P were the most pressing matters for PD - although I don't think TT was as difficult to develop. Meanwhile, as all this is going on... Sony is constantly throwing GT events like GT Academy and demos for expos and whatnot and Kaz also had quite an active motorsports schedule too.

I support PD and I think GT5 is a great game (except the X1). As much as I could pick it apart, I really do come home to it every day and give it hours of attention. Forza looks fun and all, but it just doesn't have the same allure as GT. It's similar but lacks the evolution, the weight, the depth Gran Turismo has aquired throughout its history. It just simply comes off as cheap, predictable as the Xbox itself. Forza will never have the same appeal as GT. Neither will Gotham Project Racing, Shift, or Test Drive.

As far as Top Gear goes... **** Top Gear? I personally am not a fan and the American version of the BBC show is just hard to watch because they try far too hard. Jay Leno was right in that it just doesn't belong in America because it doesn't have a decade of report behind it. Car Talk with Adam Corolla is probably more interesting than American Top Gear. As far as the original goes, it's just a TV show made for entertainment - people tune in probably more so just to watch Hammond, Clarkson, and that third wheel guy make assholes of themselves. I don't see how they could compare to any of the motorsports and motorsports personalities involved to have a bigger part in the game. GT is above all that, IMO. The focus isn't TG... it's cars, motorports, driving, and community. Even if Forza makes better use of the liscense, it still will not be a better game. Clarkson's **** eating grin will not make Forza a better game. The test track itself will not make Forza a better game. It's all just tacked on for the sake of money, which will make it as soul-less as the rest of the game.
 
Last edited:
But that doesn't matter, GT5 wasn't the only game being developed which means they were focusing on TT and GTpsp (as stated before).

Which makes even less sense when you consider Kazunori is on the Board of Directors. He could have easily passed the task off to some third-party developer and just collaborate with whomever from time to time whilst still focusing core effort on GT5. They (PD) either need to get someone to take assume Kazunori's place at the company or learn how to better manage their available resources.

Being able to boast of how many side projects you finished isn't something worth doing when your core product suffers as a result.


I agree it still took pretty long for it's release but many people have to realize that in those 5 years they weren't 100% focused on GT5, also not to mention that they're understaffed as it is, plus you have to understand that game devs are human which means they don't base every day of their life developing a game, they need vacation time, time to unwind, spend with family/friends.

That would be a point worth making if the staff weren't already sleeping in their working quarters. So, that's not really a counter argument whatsoever, in fact, it's actually counter-intuitive.

And what exactly did the other game achieve in 2years?

Are you referring to 3 or 4 here?
 
Terronium-12
Which makes even less sense when you consider Kazunori is on the Board of Directors. He could have easily passed the task off to some third-party developer and just collaborate with whomever from time to time whilst still focusing core effort on GT5. They (PD) either need to get someone to take assume Kazunori's place at the company or learn how to better manage their available resources.

Being able to boast of how many side projects you finished isn't something worth doing when your core product suffers as a result.

That would be a point worth making if the staff weren't already sleeping in their working quarters. So, that's not really a counter argument whatsoever, in fact, it's actually counter-intuitive.

Are you referring to 3 or 4 here?

Someone taking KY place? No that would more than likely result as a bad move. I'm not sure what you mean when you said "sleeping in their working quarters" lol give them a break they're working hard :). I was referring to 3.
 
Back