Once again people are reading the question, and then answering a different question.
The question is "Do you think Gran Turismo would be better if developed for the PC?" not "Do you think Gran Turismo will ever be developed for the PC?"
I don't think anybody heard you..
Sure, may be a dumb question which lives in la-la land, but humor the thread author and try to respond at least partially on topic.
For my part, the good points have already been made.
Most PC games can be run in a variety of resource modes, so super-PCs can get the best graphics possible while more modest machines can still run the game. But graphics are only part of what makes a great game.
The best part of my PC game experience has been user mods. For the PC, users wouldn't have to resort to half-assed hybriding, they'd be able to build their own cars completely with an in game tool, and then share them with other users. Tracks could likewise be built and shared, and no worries about licensing issues for PD, since it's all aftermarket user created free content. There would be an online community in the thousands active in such endeavors, and among them all, a few dozen able to create really top-notch product. There would be hundreds of courses and tens of thousands of different vehicles to choose from, not counting all the permutations of tuning states. And even the tuning model would be modded, so you could add superchargers vs turbo, different brakes, etc. I can even see different kinds of scripted campaigns, with different goals and limitations for increased single player enjoyment. In short, what would make the GT series so much better on a PC is that game development would continue for years after release with 10x the staff any developer could devote to a game.
But as I said, really this question is a moot point. As a PC gamer, I've seem game quality steadily declining as the community keeps migrating to consoles (myself included thanks initially to GT1). Even without piracy concerns, there's just not enough of a market to justify the cost of developing with today's capabilities (in the past when machines were simpler and your whole program couldn't be bigger than a floppy disk and you only had 16 colors to work with, etc., development was often handled by just a few people for under $100K, no more today. How many people worked on GT5 for instance, and what was the budget? and yes it would've had to be more people and a larger budget to achieve the same quality on a PC...)
