Says the guy not involved in the thread, ****ling around the forums...
Considering your contributions to this thread, it's a real stretch on your part to say you're involved in any useful capacity.
Funny we always got along, until that fateful day I disagreed with you.
Do you remember it? Or am I just on your list, and you can't remember why?
I don't have a "list." I disagree with people who are wrong, especially when they are wrong but decide acting haughty with their head up their ass is the correct way to respond to criticism. If you frequently fall under that category, that's your problem.
You know the definition right? What you're doing, that is it!
Let's take this from the top:
Interesting that you quote a single racing organization and use them to define the rules of all racing.
No, he didn't do that. Strawman. If you were following the thread from the beginning, he described a specific racing incident in an FIA sanctioned race that he considered fair, was questioned on why he thought it was acceptable, then explained why under FIA rules the incident unfolded the way it did.
That was instead you latching onto a single poorly worded sentence:
It isn't dirty driving it's called racing, which is why it's allowed in ALL forms of real motorsport.
And dictating that every single post following that was an attempt to defend that sentence, even when he explained it.
Next:
So are you saying that every racing series in the world follow "FIA rules", or just trying to give that impression?
No, he wasn't saying that. Strawman. You specifically asked him if the rules would be done differently for open wheel cars or closed wheel cars. He simply responded that those rules apply for all of the FIA's sanctioned series, open or closed wheel; and then provided a specific non-FIA series that followed those same rules anyway. In essence, you attempted to call him out for answering a question you wanted him to answer.
And yes, most racing series do follow FIA racing regulations or attempt to emulate them in some capacity, so you just look foolish regardless for trying to drag him over the coals for the statement.
Then:
If I'm not mistaken, FIA holds some of the most ***-up racing in the world, races where people intentionally let other people win, and if they don't, they can get fired. (teammates)
Pardon me, I couldn't care less what that ridiculous organization does.
You made it clear that you didn't actually care about anything what he was saying regarding rules the FIA has for
racing etiquette (you know, the thing this tread was about), and were apparently just setting him up so you can vent about your irrelevant views about the inner politics of the FIA.
By the way:
Finally:
I'm sorry this didn't go the (waaaa) way you wanted (sniff sniff) I'll leave you win now.
When it was made clear that the person you were arguing with didn't care about your opinions of the politicking that goes on in the FIA, since that was never what he was talking about, you tried to pass it off as if he was throwing a tantrum for being proven wrong. The problem, of course, is that you have to actually
prove him wrong first for that accusation to stick; rather than repeatedly trying to accuse him of sentiments he wasn't saying before simply dismissing everything he said out of hand for irrelevant reasoning.
So, to wrap up, either you
are just trolling this thread, or you are incapable of arguing a point that isn't slam dunk in your favor without resorting to logical fallacies and are now just trying to salvage something with all these too cool for school "witty" retorts so people don't realize that. And since you felt the need to bring up post history between us to try to further move the focus from what you've actually said in this thread (but were at least clever enough to leave out specifics), yes, I
am pretty sure that it is the latter.
Anything else?
