even without the glitch (there where MANY ways to cheat the system), you could earn fair and square more than a couple of hundrend thousand per hour.
and thats without adding all the minor stuff that adds money to you.
so, think about that for a minute, and answer not to me, but to yourself: was there really a reason for this uproar?
was EVER forza motorsport 5 the worst offender of microtransactions? or even close?
it sure was painted that way...
and do you like it now better, where you have probably dozens of millions sitting and your garages full?
ps
I just checked you out like you suggested, it seems you didnt get to play before patch too. => it perfectly explains why you say this.
and yes, your/our friend Brend, coming to lecture me with his measly two hours in a game I've spent thousands in and know inside-out, also lying about having played the game when said economy was in place, yeap, that's a perfectly good reason for me, not to invalidate "issues the game had", since thats (the original economy) clearly up for debate, but just invalidade Brend's authority on the matter.
See, the issue here is that you're misconstruing the issue because it wasn't one for you apparently. You're choosing to ignore the many that had an issue with it, essentially ignoring the facts because you didn't have an issue. Hours is usually not an amount of time that someone has to sit down to earn the relatively small amount of money in order to buy cars that where outrageously priced.
Yes. It's as if you haven't read my replies that have repeatedly stated it.
Yes, it was.
Why would I care about it anymore? Not only was it two iterations, and 4 years ago, but it has since been rectified.
It doesn't matter if I played before, after, or during, these are issues that plagued the game upon release, something you seemingly are trying to ignore just because people have played after it was rectified. I may have not played at the beginning, but I've been following Forza titles, all of them, from the get go.ps
I just checked you out like you suggested
Lots of reasons. Money, Money and no time, Money, and probably money. In all seriousness I don't see why anyone would buy in game currency either, but taking advantage of glitches never stopped me, in any way, from enjoying the game any more or any less. I didn't go and immediately buy everything, I still purchased cars in gradual steps as I liked tuning and using everything I purchased.
Unfortunately we probably wont have an good idea about how that game is running until its closer to it's release date, I'd imagine.
For me (with games like The Crew 1 anyway) it's sometimes isn't, despite these games being addictive to play. There were some non story missions that given you cash in The Crew, but they require you to spend minutes (or even hours!) just to get enough money you needed to spend on cars or whatever stuff you wanted. So I ended up buying its tokens that were on sell back then, but stopped afterwards. Now in Forza, money is now never an issue which I'm very thankful for. The Crew, please, never be like that one.
You can laugh but
For as long as you think people must meet your obscene time played criteria to have a discussion about this you'll continue to live in this echo chamber that Forza 5 at launch didn't require any changes.
I'm done dealing with your obsessive rants about how the world was against Forza 5 at launch. The continued ignorance so far to even refute that Turn 10 altered the economy for the better is frankly baffling. You still aren't using correct punctuation either.
Would have been an issue if the cutscenes and the like where, well you know, more than a minute? Those weren't an issue in the slightest and takes away absolutely nothing about the point.
You've stated little facts, if anything, hes stating facts too. Hell, you've came in with claims that you have not backed up, and you've disregarding posts about things that have been heavily documented, just because the poster hasn't played as long as you'd like them to. Because you choose to ignore things doesn't make them not an issue. This is a case that doesn't not even require playing, because of how documented it is. All it takes is a read up to understand the grasp of the situation.
Hopefully this is true, this time.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, you've proved yourself a liar. He asked for proof, you provided none. Unnecessary hostility ensued because of you and the claims you've made that you can't back up.
So again
So if you don't want to point out what specifically hes lying about and spreading misinformation, than again, consider yourself a liar.
The whole damn gaming community has a clue. This is not a case of "you have to had played it to understand." It's very well documented so get over the bs. Its absolutely stupid to go about it that way. Your first hand experience is nothing but personal opinion, its easy to dismiss when the vast majority was literally the complete opposite. Cool, you thought it was fine, alright, but that doesn't change anything about what happened and why it went down.
It's funny that you said this earlier in the thread, and then say
You've literally provided proof to the claims people were making, and shot down yourself. I game ranging from 1-2 hours every couple of days, how long would that have taken? If I play an hour every single day getting just one of the mid range, 6mil price tagged cars, would have taken 30 days had they not done anything to the economy. That's if I play every single day, in which I don't. I for one am glad that the economy was fixed before I came around, because that sounds horrendous.
Except there was no "In my opinion" anywhere. So that was your fault that it was perceived that way, no one elses. You've got called on your claim, had no proof, so in turn, you are a liar. Especially now more than than, because you are continuing down this path.
Don't make absolutely baseless claims if you don't want to get called on them. Hell, its the rules of the forums. We've all gotten by just fine.
That makes absolute no sense. The internet in this case is part of a collective of people that had an issue with said game. Lets look at it another way. T10 never changes their underlying game that dramatically, ever, so if it wasn't an issue at all, than why would they go so far to halve it by nearly 50%? Because there was an issue, you just didn't agree with it.
You've presented no proof. You've asked to go check our garages. What does that have to do with anything? It doesn't change the issue that was in the past. Its 2 games and 4 years later now.
I didn't, but that wasn't until after the economy changed that you are allowed to drive them all for free. Didn't you have to rent them before?
Stop moving the goal posts. You posted another "Fact" which just doesn't line up and contradict what you've stated prior. You shot down the fact that people claimed it would take 1 month+ to get these cars, and yet, you've just proved them true.
As if that wasn't fairly obvious.
There was nothing to miss there because it does nothing to disprove the fact that this was an issue to the general consensus. It was so much of an issue that T10 jumped at the chance to rectify it, and that's out of character for something so massive. It just makes it not an issue for you. You had time, good for you. Look at my example though since you're clamoring on about missing things.
There's nothing to learn from someone dismissing literal and obvious problems that plagued a game early on in its launch, just because "I did it, so it's not an issue."You clearly prefer to learn nothing out of my experience. Well hopefully somebody else does..
