Formula 1 Gulf Air Bahrain Grand Prix 2020Formula 1 

  • Thread starter Jimlaad43
  • 373 comments
  • 17,613 views
The fire marshals were incredibly quick, the guy who ran across and aimed the extinguishant at the driver was brilliant. How Romain got out with the barrier literally over the cockpit was incredible. Romain is incredibly lucky and the marshalling shown in the immediate aftermath was exemplary. Well done guys!
 
PeterJB
I was thinking yesterday I can't remember the last time a fuel cell went up in flames...

It would appear we've found our latest safety flaw the needs correcting. There is clearly a flaw in the design of both the cars and the armco barriers, which apparently are weak enough to be breached by a car but also strong enough to cleanly slice a car in half. I've always felt a bit funny about the fuel cell being directly behind the driver, the car broke up in the way that the front wing can be easier attached and detached, and that should've be happening right down the middle of the car. Hubert's car broke in the same place.
Click to expand...


Martin Brundle's car snapped in half in roughly the same place too.

GnUns6FJjq9WpxJLhUUBTwtWuz5LLB2Rp3xX1m-gZ-8.jpg


Is it an inherent flaw in "that shape" of open-wheel race cars?
 
I’m on tape delay but someone needs to look into that Haas design. Cars are NOT supposed to burst into flames like that. Appalling. Thankful that he’s safe
 
If he doesn't race anymore this season, he did quit in typical Grosjean style. And with his biggest work ever.
 
What bothers me is... Why there are still those kinds of barriers in F1??... There should be at least a few safer barriers already in F1 races, just like La Sarthe having a safer in the 24h!
 
girabyt3
What bothers me is... Why there are still those kinds of barriers in F1??... There should be at least a few safer barriers already in F1 races, just like La Sarthe having a safer in the 24h!
Click to expand...
I'm not sure, to be honest. They have to have some reason for it.
 
Looks like a small bit of debris from Stroll may have impacted RoGro's FR tire. Not sure if that played a part in the incident.
 
girabyt3
What bothers me is... Why there are still those kinds of barriers in F1??... There should be at least a few safer barriers already in F1 races, just like La Sarthe having a safer in the 24h!
Click to expand...

Dont think you can compare a Open Wheel Racer to an LMP or GT car.
There is more gap between body and tank is larger in these cars as the cars are not as tightly packaged.
 
Let's not forget that heavy deformation of barriers and bits coming off the cars is good for reducing the energy of the collision.

Let's be thankful that in spite of such a serious accident, the driver is walking away with relatively minor injuries... that's a testament to the safety protocols and procedures already in place. I'd suggest it's not luck that kept him alive, it's planning, foresight, design, testing, knowledge, planning and a whole host of other things that go on behind the scenes. Hopefully they'll learning something new from this, but let's not clamor for too many knee jerk reactions.
 
girabyt3
What bothers me is... Why there are still those kinds of barriers in F1??... There should be at least a few safer barriers already in F1 races, just like La Sarthe having a safer in the 24h!
Click to expand...
Going through the barrier probably saved him, if that was solid concrete (which worryingly is what they're replacing it with), it would have stopped him much quicker and caused deceleration injuries as well as the fire.

SAFER is designed for different types of impact, mainly sideways ones designed to keep the car moving along the wall in ovals, and is always much closer to the racing line than that barrier was.
 
Last edited:
Jimlaad43
Going through the barrier probably saved him, if that was solid concrete (which worryingly is what they're replacing it with), it would have stopped him much quicker and caused deceleration injuries as well as the fire.
Click to expand...
These types of concrete walls (the connected blocks) also have a bit of give. It's not as bad as you'd think
 
PeterJB
I doubt Grosjean will be racing again next week, so it's looks like Mazepin or Schumacher may get an early promotion, though I wouldn't blame them if they decide to pass on that...
Click to expand...

I don't think Grosjean is gonna be in that car even at Abu Dhabi.
 
Last edited:
Put up concrete with safer walls from the ovals. Those things work. Has been shown in Indycar and Nascar.
 
MatskiMonk
I'd suggest it's not luck that kept him alive, it's planning, foresight, design, testing, knowledge, planning and a whole host of other things that go on behind the scenes.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Brawn calls luck "preparation awaiting opportunity", and that's what this was. Astonished to see Grosjean climbing out of that.

There will surely be some lessons to learn but for now... ****.
 
PaMu1337
These types of concrete walls (the connected blocks) also have a bit of give. It's not as bad as you'd think
Click to expand...
Kvyat's crash at Silverstone begs to differ. Bear in mind I have first-hand experience of cars that have hit Armco vs Concrete as a marshal. Armco is much preferred to hit for circuit racing.
 
Last edited:
Grayfox
Dont think you can compare a Open Wheel Racer to an LMP or GT car.
There is more gap between body and tank is larger in these cars as the cars are not as tightly packaged.
Click to expand...
I'm not comparing... I know there's a huge difference between an open-wheel and a GT/LMP... I'm saying the safer barriers can have a bigger effect in safety terms in an open-wheel crash, just see the IndyCar's crashes, those things (in ovals) can stay above 200+ mph (320+ kmh) and most can always end with the car ignited due to the impact, still the drivers end up with some minor bruises (or any) in those crashes thanks to the safers. Yeah, I know we are on a circuit (with slow corners and straights that can't pass over 200+ mph) but a safer obviously would have easily avoided this situation.
 

Latest Posts

Back