Funny Pic Thread VII - No swearing. No sex. No complaining. (READ FIRST POST)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Max Powers
  • 49,943 comments
  • 5,556,764 views
tumblr_mu3ucmp3l01sg9hogo8_1280.jpg
tumblr_mu3ucmp3l01sg9hogo1_1280.jpg
tumblr_mu3ucmp3l01sg9hogo4_1280.jpg
 
Bopop4
[Removed]
Jokes go in the jokes thread, even if they have an out of context picture of Winnie the Pooh underneath them, screenshotted from Reddit.
 
Jokes go in the jokes thread, even if they have an out of context picture of Winnie the Pooh underneath them, screenshotted from Reddit.

The joke wasn't the funny part, Pooh's face was.

You could replace the text with anything stupid and it'd still be funny.

Hell, you could just have the pic, and it would be funny.
 
Feel free to post the picture on its own then.

It's not my place to say what is and isn't funny, but prepare your diddly-hole for the deluge of people posting that they don't get it and it's not funny.

You could try meme-ifying it, I guess?
 
You need someone to say something daft to put before it.
The text is the buildup, and the pic is the punchline.

This had even less "pic" to it, and the funny part is just a single word, not that different from what I just posted.
 
You need someone to say something daft to put before it.
The text is the buildup, and the pic is the punchline.
No, the punchline is the punchline. The pic is basically a reaction gif only without the animation.
This had even less "pic" to it, and the funny part is just a single word, not that different from what I just posted.
Public service announcement.

This is a funny picture:
This, meanwhile, is a funny sentiment, placed on top of a picture (and let's be fair, a picture that's actually two video stills):
It's funny, but the funny is in the reading of it - the picture is simple context.

This, however, is just words:
This thread is called the "Funny Pic Thread", not the "Funny Thread". Please ensure your funny pictures are pictorial in nature.

And now, back to your regular programming...
It's not up for discussion.
 
Yes, and?

It is a picture, and it is funny.
Then post the picture, like I said. It does not need the text for context (as you just claimed).
The one I posted on page 933 has words, and a couple simple drawings.
No difference.
Yes there is and I just quoted my own post explaining what the difference is.

I also said it's not up for discussion. Post the picture or don't. Don't keep complaining and don't repost the joke with the contextless picture again.
 
Are manual transmissions really that uncommon in the US? And why?
Yep, for a combination of many reasons.
1) Americans are lazy.
2) They've been led to believe that autos are objectively better at everything, when in fact the opposite as true up until a few years ago.
3) Americans tend to buy cars that come as auto only (SUVs, minivans, big saloons, basically anything massive)
4) Because so many people went to autos, nobody knows how to drive a manual. In driver education courses they don't even acknowledge that manuals exist.
 

Latest Posts

Back