GT5 Latest News & Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter gamelle71
  • 76,879 comments
  • 10,792,362 views
I am very impressed with the new shots of Toscana. Seems to definately indicate new build as well as some visual improvements. I would've never I'd say this about something thats so trivial to me, but wow that tree looks good. Not one bit of cardboard cutout. Guess now you can add "it only does 3d trees" :D

Yeah, but it's very speculative. On one hand Bugatti and Lamborghini's names have been sitting on that disc since Prologue came out, which is pretty funny. On the other hand Kaz has already confirmed no bikes, so it's likely just every codename they'd created at that point and it goes pontiac, proto... in alphabetical order. Only interesting one I can see is Dome.

I noticed that yesterday. Its interesting that the Dome S102 is listed, a car that has been sighted in this video here:
 
Last edited:
To tell the truth, to me the improvements to the Toscana dirt track seem very subtle, I wouldn't have probably noticed them if you didn't tell me or if I didn't compare together the different versions.
 
I can't wait for gt5, but today i try GTR2 on my m11x with HDMI on my 22' and PWTS and is AWESOME! While i was driving on SPA with all AIDS off, ff set like reality, clutch enabled, h gearshift, on an 350z during night with beams i ****** on my pants. Sorry for my english and for the off topic but if gt5 will have SPA and phisics like GTR2 will be' best game EVAH! Sorry but i'm so excited!!!! Damn Sony!
 
I am very impressed with the new shots of Toscana. Seems to definately indicate new build as well as some visual improvements. I would've never I'd say this about something thats so trivial to me, but wow that tree looks good. Not one bit of cardboard cutout. Guess now you can add "it only does 3d trees" :D
I bet you won't see those trees on tracks containing many trees though. The trees on Toscana is probably more detailed because there are not that many of 'em and it will most likely not support 16 car races.
 
Happy November 2nd from the Uk.
 
To tell the truth, to me the improvements to the Toscana dirt track seem very subtle, I wouldn't have probably noticed them if you didn't tell me or if I didn't compare together the different versions.

+1 (Except the fireworks of course)

Happy November 2nd from the Uk.

And beerland.
 
Liking the enthusiam, but you might want to watch your language.
 
The rainy Eiger track has the Clouds icon, Moon for night, Sun for clear day
Check out the fireworks in the sky at 1:55 and 2:06 on the Toscana track!
They showed off the X1 replay at the event
[YOUTUBEHD]U2ZVG6oJuCk[/YOUTUBEHD]

The game froze when the Enzo crashed at the wall and the Sony employee had to reset the PS3 :nervous::nervous:
 
You're speaking to us from the future. I must warn you, sorcery is a grey area on the gt forums.

Yes we are 5 hours in the future and there is no release date yet :D.

I hope the fireworks aren't a sarcastic dig at bonfire night on the 5th
 
To tell the truth, to me the improvements to the Toscana dirt track seem very subtle, I wouldn't have probably noticed them if you didn't tell me or if I didn't compare together the different versions.

The first one we saw (From what I remember) was just a plain field, with a couple of the orange blocks on the side of some turns.

Now its filled with trees, spectators, camps, and some fireworks
 
My earlier post to you isn't opinion based. It is truth based. The delay is a fact. I quoted sources that point this out. In understanding that, there really is only one side.

I believe the confusion for you arises when you think that people talking of the delay is a matter of perspective. It really isn't. How one deals with the delay is a matter of perspective though. Your expectations lead me to believe you were prepared for a delay and to do more waiting. That is completely fine.

I would agree with you that people getting as angry as they do about the delay is absurd. The point has been made, no? To put it another way, we know already. I'm personally not that invested in the GT5 release. Why? Well, I go weeks without playing my PS3. I then catch the bug to play again and I do. I hope some of this is clarifying rather than negative.

Like i said before, I didn't have a problem with you. I have a problem when people label things as facts that aren't. I didn't say the game wasn't delayed officially. I said in my mind, it's not even a delay because weve had to wait this long for it, more waiting is a given. The fact that they said it wouldn't be out on the 2nd a couple weeks ago further cemented in my mind that I'd have to wait longer anyway. I don't take these release dates to heart because anything can get delayed, anything can get pushed back. So in my mind it's expected. Expect the worse and hope for the best is how I feel.

No you're right that I haven't got a sense of humour ( at least not vaguely resembling yours that is ), you're wrong in assuming this is a private conversation however, it's a public forum where everybody reads and can react to what's written.

I didn't say this forum wasn't public, but I didn't REPLY to you, you replied to me. Isn't that what my last comment said? Your sense of humor is just that, yours. And I could careless if it resembles mine or not. I'm sure you feel the same way, so when i reply to you and state something don't be surprised, since you obviously do the same. Everything has to have a critic, but surely you don't need to me my critic and i don't need to be yours.
 
I think sony needs to read this part of the dictionary again, because i believe they made one of these things described below.

prom·ise   
[prom-is]
noun, verb, -ised, -is·ing.
–noun

1.
a declaration that something will or will not be done, given, etc., by one: unkept political promises.
2.
an express assurance on which expectation is to be based: promises that an enemy will not win.
3.
something that has the effect of an express assurance; indication of what may be expected.
4.
indication of future excellence or achievement: a writer who shows promise.
5.
something that is promised.
–verb (used with object)
6.
to engage or undertake by promise (usually used with an infinitive or a clause as object): She promised to go tomorrow.
7.
to make a promise of (some specified act, gift, etc.): to promise help.
8.
to make a promise of something to (a specified person): Promise me that you will come.
9.
to afford ground for expecting: The sky promised a storm.
10.
to engage to join in marriage.
11.
to assure (used in emphatic declarations): I won't go there again, I promise you that!
–verb (used without object)
12.
to afford ground for expectation (often fol. by well or fair ): His forthcoming novel promises well.
13.
to make a promise.


Origin:
1375&#8211;1425; (n.) late ME promis ( se ) < ML pr&#333;missa, for L pr&#333;missum, n. use of neut. ptp. of pr&#333;mittere to promise, lit., to send forth, equiv. to pr&#333;- pro-1 + mittere to send; (v.) late ME promisen, deriv. of the n.

&#8212;Related forms
prom·is·a·ble, adjective
prom·ise·ful, adjective
prom·is·er, noun
outpromise, verb (used with object), -ised, -is·ing.
o·ver·prom·ise, verb (used with object), -ised, -is·ing.
pre·prom·ise, noun, verb (used with object), -ised, -is·ing.
quasi-promised, adjective
re·prom·ise, verb, -ised, -is·ing.
un·prom·ised, adjective

&#8212;Synonyms
2. word, pledge. 6. pledge, covenant, agree.
 
I think sony needs to read this part of the dictionary again, because i believe they made one of these things described below.

There wasn't that word in their statement, they didn't say we PROMISE a release date before the end of the month. The wording was much different. So you can't fault them for some word they didn't use.
 
GT is the best marketing FAIL ever, please give me a better example...

Duke Nukem and Prey instantly jump to mind as things that surpass GT5 in marketing fail.

If you want development time, talk to Blizzard first. Diablo III has been in development since 2001, and doesn't have a release date yet. Somehow, this doesn't seem to be brought up whenever people think about games that take long to develop though.
 

the pressure on Sony will ramp up at the weekend when people who don't frequent forum's and are expecting a game to be released realize its not happening (there are comments on the blog with people hyped about it's release tomorrow). I do believe there will be a date by the end of the weekend...Now then wheres my Ruby slippers.....
 
the pressure on Sony will ramp up at the weekend when people who don't frequent forum's and are expecting a game to be released realize its not happening (there are comments on the blog with people hyped about it's release tomorrow). I do believe there will be a date by the end of the weekend...Now then wheres my Ruby slippers.....

ruby_slippers-3.jpg
 
There wasn't that word in their statement, they didn't say we PROMISE a release date before the end of the month. The wording was much different. So you can't fault them for some word they didn't use.

and the release date of november 2nd wasn't a promise?

"THE GAME WILL RELEASE NOVEMBER 2ND IN NORTH AMERICA"

yeah right!

"There will be a new releasedate by the end of october"

yeah right!

anyhow, i just came across this, and forgive me if this has been posted already, but this threat is going way to fast for me to keep up.

A Japanese retailer had a December 23rd releasedate on their website for a moment, only to remove it from their site minutes later.

Link

gt5.jpg
 
I read a little report with F1 test pilot Andy Soucek impression's about GT5 physics and graphics in "Fórmula Car & Tecno" magazine, in Spain (I don't know if this magazine is also sold elsewhere...). Has it been already said or should it tell you it?
 
I didn't say this forum wasn't public, but I didn't REPLY to you, you replied to me. Isn't that what my last comment said? Your sense of humor is just that, yours. And I could careless if it resembles mine or not. I'm sure you feel the same way, so when i reply to you and state something don't be surprised, since you obviously do the same. Everything has to have a critic, but surely you don't need to me my critic and i don't need to be yours.

You clearly fail to detect the subtleties of language often thankfully displayed and largely understood around here as this answer illustrates again, which would be fine if you didn't react so literal ( for lack of a better word ) and try to explain what I understood already or even what I myself wrote ( I can read and comprehend often at the same time ).
You've got the 'dry' part covered, now aim for the witty bit.....
And no there's indeed no need for me to be your critic ( don't flatter yourself in thinking I'm exclusively your critic though ) but I'm free to choose what I criticize on a public forum regardless to whom it's aimed at originally.
 
Back