- 845
i think it is a bit crazy that the la sarthe 2009 have time and weather when the same trak just without the chicanes dosn,t have weather or time and we are now 3000 pages 
Did Gt4 have Advanced online abilities, 16 cars on track, nascar, karting, driving challenges, track creator, high end physics engine, weather, time changes, cockpit view , etc?
![]()
Biggest let down for me. An also no Testarrossa.
My GS is doing a midnight release.
24th november!!! Hell yeah!!!
I don't see how it's not the game that was expected. I've followed it extremely close and none of the things that have been unveiled today are surprising. I've seen some say "Wait, there aren't day/night cycles on all tracks" or "There isn't weather on all tracks" both of those things were made clear when the features were announced. Kaz said that day/night cycles were for tracks that made sense for endurance races and for randomly generated tracks. Then there are some complaining about tracks not being in, like Spa, when PD never announced such a thing. That's not even getting into the tuning complaints, which Kaz made quite clear wasn't going to be as in depth as Forza nor were they trying to make it that way as it's not the focus of the series.
All in all, this is what I expected it to be. The most feature packed racing game ever
3000! Now lets start anew. From now on, only happy posts until we play the game. Agreed?![]()
The game isn't even out yet and people are already judging it on some silly little track list and car list, anyone ever heard of the term "don't judge a book by it's cover"??
(second rant of day over)
👍There's nothing wrong with being disappointed or expressing your opinion, but good lawd...some of you are just whining. I'm disappointed with the lack of certain tracks too, but some of you are going a tad bit too far.
To say this is GT4 HD or GT 4.5 is idiotic in my opinion. To ask what they have been doing for 5 or so years in a negative manner is also idiotic in my opinion. I'm glad they decided to carry over cars instead of doing what they did with GT3.
They had to learn to code for PS3 which is apparently a difficult system to come to grips with. They're introducing a completely revamped physics system which I'm pretty sure took up the majority of the time, and have added damage and weather which I'm also pretty sure took up a good bit of time.
Developing a racing game is not just about the amount of tracks/cars or varieties of cars/tracks. If the most important part of a racing game (i.e. physics) isn't good, the rest of the game will suffer. I'm glad they added all the extra features. Besides, none of us even have the game. There's no telling what surprises PD has in store for us. Surprises which may not even be on the car or track lists.
I'm not saying don't bring up the possible negatives, and I'm definitely not sticking up for PD. I'm simply saying that some of you are making some outlandish statements about a game you don't even have yet, having therefore not put any time into it to make such claims yet. At least wait until you go through EVERY single aspect of GT5 before doing so.
Can't wait to see you guys online.
Your friend,
jMO![]()
Waaaaaaah, too many cars from GT4!
Waaaaaaah, not enough tracks from GT4!
![]()
There's nothing wrong with being disappointed or expressing your opinion, but good lawd...some of you are just whining. I'm disappointed with the lack of certain tracks too, but some of you are going a tad bit too far.
To say this is GT4 HD or GT 4.5 is idiotic in my opinion. To ask what they have been doing for 5 or so years in a negative manner is also idiotic in my opinion. I'm glad they decided to carry over cars instead of doing what they did with GT3.
They had to learn to code for PS3 which is apparently a difficult system to come to grips with. They're introducing a completely revamped physics system which I'm pretty sure took up the majority of the time, and have added damage and weather which I'm also pretty sure took up a good bit of time.
Developing a racing game is not just about the amount of tracks/cars or varieties of cars/tracks. If the most important part of a racing game (i.e. physics) isn't good, the rest of the game will suffer. I'm glad they added all the extra features. Besides, none of us even have the game. There's no telling what surprises PD has in store for us. Surprises which may not even be on the car or track lists.
I'm not saying don't bring up the possible negatives, and I'm definitely not sticking up for PD. I'm simply saying that some of you are making some outlandish statements about a game you don't even have yet, having therefore not put any time into it to make such claims yet. At least wait until you go through EVERY single aspect of GT5 before doing so.
Can't wait to see you guys online.
Your friend,
jMO![]()
yea i thought the same thing about all the others too, but used the golf as an example.