GT5 Latest News & Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter gamelle71
  • 76,879 comments
  • 10,801,259 views
SHIRAKAWA Akira
Any guess for Premium keis that will be unveiled at the Tokyo Game Show?
Click to expand...

I hope the Beat and the AZ-1 are premium, as well as the Life! :sly: I want to see the Life Step Van in full 1080p glory barreling down a narrow street, being chased by a 500! Seriously!
 
angles.png


maybe that helps?
 
^ :lol:

It really shouldn't take an image like that for people (or person, there was only one who disagreed...) to realise :p

Jake360
It's not F1 2010. That car has grooved tyres on.
Click to expand...

I was going to say that. But then I remembered wet and intermediate tyres :)

Even if it is rFactor, could still have been F1 2010.
 
If he doesn't see body roll he's got bigger problems than can be fixed with some red lines. :P
 
CTznOfTime
but ultimately find it funny that someone could miss that (body roll)?! ;)
Click to expand...

I don't find it funny. The nice thing about the picture is that it gives you reference points. Both the tires are over the grooves, grout between the bricks, in the ground. If you lighten the picture and use the bumper as a reference line, then measure out lines from opposite, common points on the bumper, the vertical lines between those points and the ground are within 10% of each others' lengths. Unless the car was doing 5 mph, the difference should be more. Having seen 1950s and 1960s cars taking turns at brisk speeds, the car in the picture does not represent it properly.
In final, you were right, there is roll, however to me it did not look correct and therefore skewed my judgment.

Eunos_Cosmo
angles.png


maybe that helps?
Click to expand...

it would help if you actually measured out the points on a brighter picture as opposed to using microsoft paint and making random lines that are not correct.
Nice try though.
 
i didnt want to be mean like you real_tron :lol:


.... obviously, the car was doing much more than 5mph there... and it looks perfectly fine to me/everyone else.

But no matter now, everyone can make mistakes, especially me. (just not this time).
So we are all ok now!
 
dave_sz
I don't find it funny. The nice thing about the picture is that it gives you reference points. Both the tires are over the grooves, grout between the bricks, in the ground. If you lighten the picture and use the bumper as a reference line, then measure out lines from opposite, common points on the bumper, the vertical lines between those points and the ground are within 10% of each others' lengths. Unless the car was doing 5 mph, the difference should be more. Having seen 1950s and 1960s cars taking turns at brisk speeds, the car in the picture does not represent it properly.
In final, you were right, there is roll, however to me it did not look correct and therefore skewed my judgment.
Click to expand...

:lol:

Seriously? Seriously??

You're judging body roll, physics and speed, in a video game, from a blurry picture?
 
Maybe it's just trundling along, and the photographer hasn't had his coffee yet...?
 
Those photomode images are too awesome. I wish we can open vehicle's door in photo-travel. I was disappointed when I couldn't take the same picture in GT4.

serad.jpg
 
Seismica
I was going to say that. But then I remembered wet and intermediate tyres :)

Even if it is rFactor, could still have been F1 2010.
Click to expand...

It's clearly rFactor, it's recognizable by hud. 👍
 
franz
Those photomode images are too awesome. I wish we can open vehicle's door in photo-travel. I was disappointed when I couldn't take the same picture in GT4.

serad.jpg
Click to expand...

Heh. I'd forgotten all about that. :irked:

Well, these shots are always going to be spruced up a tad...
 
dave_sz
I don't find it funny. The nice thing about the picture is that it gives you reference points. Both the tires are over the grooves, grout between the bricks, in the ground. If you lighten the picture and use the bumper as a reference line, then measure out lines from opposite, common points on the bumper, the vertical lines between those points and the ground are within 10% of each others' lengths. Unless the car was doing 5 mph, the difference should be more. Having seen 1950s and 1960s cars taking turns at brisk speeds, the car in the picture does not represent it properly.
In final, you were right, there is roll, however to me it did not look correct and therefore skewed my judgment.



it would help if you actually measured out the points on a brighter picture as opposed to using microsoft paint and making random lines that are not correct.
Nice try though.
Click to expand...

Damn over-analyze much? The lower line is following the ground plane, as it follows the seem of the stones. The upper line (seemingly directly above it) is the plane angle of the car. They are different...the car is angled.
 
Predwolf
:lol:

Seriously? Seriously??

You're judging body roll, physics and speed, in a video game, from a blurry picture?
Click to expand...

CSI got nothing on this place.
Who shot JFK? You'll find the answer somwhere here.
 
Eunos_Cosmo
Damn over-analyze much? The lower line is following the ground plane, as it follows the seem of the stones. The upper line (seemingly directly above it) is the plane angle of the car. They are different...the car is angled.
Click to expand...

The problem is, you didn't account for the fact that the car isn't traveling perpendicular to the groove you highlighted. Draw in a line from wheel to wheel and it should still be obvious, though..

@Spag :lol:
 
Look at the roof line of the car and compare it to the window of the building in the background. Clearly not level with it.

Wow this thread is going way to fast. :)
 
Last edited:
Just to prove your point Spaghetti it was Lee Harvey Oswald. :lol:
 
Predwolf
:lol:

Seriously? Seriously??

You're judging body roll, physics and speed, in a video game, from a blurry picture?
Click to expand...

Why, you can't do that? Sorry to hear.
 
IROC89CAMARO
A livery editor is way overrated.. it was cool back in Forza 2, but got old quick as hell in Forza3. One man can only take so much anime porn.
Click to expand...

I dont care about anime porn, goddamit why do the tasteful have to suffer, all i wanted was a big white circle with the #87 on my 65 Giulia Sprint with a white line that goes up 1\8th of the bonnet. WHYYY KAZZZ?

Gary_Highland_1967_Alfa_Giulia_Sprint_GT_9346.jpg
 
Last edited:
Griffith500
Heh. I'd forgotten all about that. :irked:

Well, these shots are always going to be spruced up a tad...
Click to expand...

I studied this building in Architecture school, I think. Is this the Tokyo Forum building?

2833119.jpg


It has the same reverse-arch roof structure.

The building is an engineering marvel. The entire roof structure is supported by those two large columns. The arches transfer all of the weight to them.
 
Spagetti69
CSI got nothing on this place.
Who shot JFK? You'll find the answer somwhere here.
Click to expand...

:lol: i laughed so hard at this !! Thanks Mate! 👍


Rob192005
Just to prove your point Spaghetti it was Lee Harvey Oswald. :lol:
Click to expand...

but Dave is going to prove us wrong... this is what i call check and balance... neutral and unbias judgement...
 
Rob192005
Just to prove your point Spaghetti it was Lee Harvey Oswald. :lol:
Click to expand...

Hhmmm Have you ever noticed how translator-San never looks at the camera.

He's a wanted man I tell ya.
 
Predwolf
:lol:



No, I wasn't born with an IQ under 100. Sorry!
Click to expand...
I didn't know they had a way to measure a doorknob's IQ?

Eunos_Cosmo
Damn over-analyze much? The lower line is following the ground plane, as it follows the seem of the stones. The upper line (seemingly directly above it) is the plane angle of the car. They are different...the car is angled.
Click to expand...

The car is angled cause it isn't parallel with he ground, not because of the body roll.
Look at the front tires, they are exactly one row of bricks apart. The way your lines work, they would be ok if both front tires were of the same row of bricks. It's not right.

Here's your picture with the wheels as reference. I didn't even go to architecture school. Funny how your over exaggerated slant all of a sudden isn't so massive. Actually, the right side of my line should be a bit higher than it is.
anglesv.jpg


CTznOfTime
:lol: i laughed so hard at this !! Thanks Mate! 👍




but Dave is going to prove us wrong... this is what i call check and balance... neutral and unbias judgement...
Click to expand...

Didn't I already apologize to you?
 
Last edited:
Convo here is a bit stiff eh...?

Can't we all for once just look at the pretty pictures and not beyond them? ;)
 
Back