You read my original post and see if I'm not simply asking that those who don't think certain cars qualify for the polls simply don't vote instead of automatically voting SU (again why not SZ?).
Here's your original post again, since we're apparently supposed to
really look at it:
For the people still voting SU because very limited/prototype/racecar, could you please just not vote instead of skewing the poll for everyone else? We got the message, such cars are still polled, just don't vote on them. You really made your point way back. The rest of us respect your opinions but don't necessarily agree, but you are welcome to abstain from voting for such cars, as I often do for my own reasons.
Explain how people are supposed to take any of
that to mean that you're referring
only to this apparent cabal of people who automatically vote SU because they don't think race cars should be polled but
not the people who automatically vote SU because they actually believe all (or at least almost all) race cars are SU. Then explain how the people who fall under at least the latter group (since I'm almost certain that there is considerable overlap) aren't supposed to think that you're referring to them when they are the most vocal and they are the most seen.
Bonus points: Explain how you meant something other than how any of the above groups aren't deliberately skewing votes when you literally said that was their reason for doing so twice:
For the people still voting SU because very limited/prototype/racecar, could you please just not vote instead of skewing the poll for everyone else?
Of course that skews the polls, it's classic tactical voting based on an ulterior motive.
And implied multiple times:
this SUBRC thing is not an opinion on the car
That the cluster:
as well as deliberately voting the opposite of what they might actually think
of SUBRC voting:
Is disingenuous:
I've never got the impression that people vote SU over and over for such cars because they genuinely think they are uncool. The SUBRC meme exemplifies that
In nature:
Folks who otherwise vote across the range just think those cars are seriously uncool because...just because. Alrighty.
If you hadn't conflated the small handful of people who consider SUBRC a rule and post nothing else because Famine once said it or something with the almost certainly much larger group of people people who consider SUBRC a rule and post nothing else because
it's a lot shorter than going into extensive detail for why they think race cars are uncool every single time a race car is polled then I daresay all of the blowback against you probably would have been avoided.
Let's try and get this cleared up. Here's the SU votes from the Corvette C7.R thread:
Cross reference it with this one from the Williams F1 car thread:
Over half of those names are identical. Here's a list for a supercar that might as well be a racecar:
And another race car:
Another race car:
Ditto:
Etc:
Again, a lot of the exact same names consistently; over the course of ~3 months. Which are the ones that don't count as sincere opinions on coolness? That is to say, which are the ones that are kneejerk reactions to try and sabotage (or, rather, "skew") a car's place on the wall because that person doesn't want it polled in the first place, instead of people just voting uncool for types of cars they think they are uncool? And/or the ones who are coattail riding and/or voting against what they actually think?
There's, what, 10-15 people who always or almost always vote seriously uncool on race cars according to the results above? And it's got to be some sort of majority to call those people out as you've done here...
