- 2,210
- NY
- BWX232
Ironic then, that GT has way better physics and force feedback.You are right, pCars doesn't compete against GT. pCars is all about simulation. GT is a simcade kind of game.
Ironic then, that GT has way better physics and force feedback.You are right, pCars doesn't compete against GT. pCars is all about simulation. GT is a simcade kind of game.
There is also a lot put into the GT Academy (but my goodness at least let Canada join). The team in my opinion is not big enough to juggle all of these things.
Ironic then, that GT has way better physics and force feedback.
Hopefully it is more than the Data Logger integration
Ironic then, that GT has way better physics and force feedback.
I doubt it. It will be yet another useful feature to be enjoyed by millions of GT6 players. Just like the multi monitor support.
You are right, pCars doesn't compete against GT. pCars is all about simulation. GT is a simcade kind of game.
I don't feel like buying more Playstations though. I have plenty of computer monitors though.
That's the point. If it is just the data logger then the last two features we got are for a very very small part of all GT6 players. I really don't get PD's priorities.
Grid2 is simcade. GT is not.
I assure you I'm not confused. SimBin was co-founded by Ian Bell (where he was also managing director); the same Ian Bell that manages, you guessed it - Slightly Mad Studios. GTR2 was made by Blimey! Games, another studio by Ian Bell where he took guys from SimBin and they developed GTR2 and GT Legends under license to SimBin.
No, they're not, but they are composed of people from SimBin.
It was a mistake in copy paste. I never heard of that game, nor do I want to. I was talking about the CAR racing games in the list.My assumption is beginning to ring true. I find it slightly misleading that you've listed Biker Bash as a game they've developed (which will be true) and then go on to say "The physics and force feedback in those games were terrible too" when no one has even played it yet.
I am using it as an example of the work they have produced, not the Simbin games that you listed, in which the physics engines were produced by ISI, not Simbin.But, moving away from that and addressing the actual point: if you're using Shift as a crutch to criticize pCARS then, as I've said previously, you went into the game with a preconceived notion of how it was going to play out. Did you ever voice your displeasure? You'll find that they actually (willingly) listen to just criticisms.
"Sucked" is not a valid criticism by way of the game never changing in a particular area.
If it wasn't to your liking, again, that's fine and you absolutely should have gotten a refund but you're not making a case.
Excuse? Honestly, what did you think you would be getting from a game that wasn't in a finished state? You were quite frankly told of the state the game would be prior to signing up and purchasing a toolpack.
The. Game. Isn't. Finished. Yet.
And yeah, I noticed the better physics every single pit stop I've made, every trip to the grass, every wet race with slick tyres, every event with SRF enforced, etc, etc...
Once again, you guys do remember that our last update was...11 days ago right? I could see maybe thinking the game had been abandoned in-between 1.04 and 1.05 but really guys? Nearly a 3rd of the people on this thread think 1.05 will be the LAST update?
Edit: Can we bring this thread back when the new update comes out?
Yup, PD has totally abandoned GT6. They've moved on, no more updates, non of the promised features will be coming, time to sell GT6.
I hope you realize that this will have nothing to do with the modelers, artists, sound team etc.I think the problem with PD at the moment is that they are focusing a bit too much in my opinion on the guys with the money to buy the Nissan GT-R's, the Toyota GT-86's and the data loggers.
Don't forget that all the data from throttle, brake and engine will mean nothing in the game unless you are monitoring it while driving on a track that is in the game. Wonder how much a day of track rental along with insurance, fuel, tires etc costsHooray, PD haven't abandoned the game!
Shame you need a $25,000 peripheral to play with their new features, but that's just an example of how PD are in touch with the future of the motor industry. In the future, I expect all racing games will require owners to purchase a new car to play them.
Don't make me laugh, bitterly.
PD are going to release another piece of paid advertising. I might as well have used my money on a subscription to an auto magazine. That is all.
Yup, PD has totally abandoned GT6. They've moved on, no more updates, non of the promised features will be coming, time to sell GT6.
How could anyone argue with that logic? It's bulletproof!If it isn't finished, how can you call it a sim then? Ha.. got ya there, huh?
.
Don't forget that all the data from throttle, brake and engine will mean nothing in the game unless you are monitoring it while driving on a track that is in the game. Wonder how much a day of track rental along with insurance, fuel, tires etc costs
I was going to say "didn't you read the OP" but you must've because you were the first to respond. Abandoned was just a way to summarize the concern that since they are working on GT7, that GT6 will be made a much lower priority and updates/dlc/whatever will be pushed back a lot (many months) and some stuff might even be literally abandoned.
But if you want to take the thread completely literally, then sure, you're right. Most people were wrong and GT was not abandoned.
Hooray, PD haven't abandoned the game!
Shame you need a $25,000 peripheral to play with their new features, but that's just an example of how PD are in touch with the future of the motor industry. In the future, I expect all racing games will require owners to purchase a new car to play them.
Don't make me laugh, bitterly.
PD are going to release another piece of paid advertising. I might as well have used my money on a subscription to an auto magazine. That is all.
Oh yeah, I forgot. This thread isn't about the game being abandoned, it's the Epic Whining & Crying thread 2. You don't have to like what's in the update. We are getting a promised feature which by the very qualifier used in the OP, means GT6 isn't abandoned.
As I said in the thread about the update, we know we are still getting updates and we're still getting the promised features. This update is evidence that we will likely see the other features in time.
Oh yeah, I forgot. This thread isn't about the game being abandoned, it's the Epic Whining & Crying thread 2. You don't have to like what's in the update. We are getting a promised feature which by the very qualifier used in the OP, means GT6 isn't abandoned.
As I said in the thread about the update, we know we are still getting updates and we're still getting the promised features. This update is evidence that we will likely see the other features in time.
Allow me to repeat myself. Hooray. PD haven't abandoned the game.
Hooray for technicalities, you win the internet!! And now for another famous technicality:"This means that PD is more focused on GT7 than GT6. If this is true, then most likely we won't ever get the promised DLC content/features."
The OP specifically says he means that we won't ever get the promised content. If GT6 was abandoned, we would NEVER get the promised content. In update 1.06 we are getting one of the promised features. So yes, most people were wrong.
I guess we're asking too much when it comes to the actual named items specified on our game containers, rather than these micro updates that are much of the same bug fixes GT5 had and hardware/software allowing systems.
Guys I just sold my Mazda 626, told my mom to sod-off, stole everything in her bank account, bought a GT86 in Japan, flew to Japan, bought a year-long pass to Tsukuba and, to top it all off, bought a TR500, 3 PS3s with 3 3DTVs and 3 copies of GT6 so I can finally use GT6 latest updates to their full extent.
PD really aware of their key demographic right there with that update...