If you had to be placed somewhere for a month where would it be?

[GM]

The middle of the Amazon Rainforest?

Floods, heavy rain, dangerous animals.


The middle of the Sahara Desert?

Extremelly hot weather, no water, dangerous animals.

 

[Gen.]

Urgh.

Another generic postwhore thread.

RATE THE ABOVE ITEM
WHERE WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO
WHAT WOULD YOU WISH FOR
HOW DO I FAILED THREAD?

 

[Casio]

Yeah. Another stupid thread.

It's also stupid because you could not survive in the Sahara for a month with no water. Hell. You wouldn't last a week without water.

You could survive in the rainforest for quite a long time.

 

[Randymcchickenf]

Someone actualy voted Sahara? I hope it wasnt after reading your post Casio!!

 

[SRV2LOW4ME]

I voted for the Sahara, because I've always wanted an excuse to drink my own pee. 💡

 

[a112]

I voted for the Sahara, because I've always wanted an excuse to drink my own pee. 💡

 

[Duke]

Is there a point to this thread? Do we get to choose where you are getting placed, George?

 

[Evolution.]

Is there a point to this thread? Do we get to choose where you are getting placed, George?

Game.

Set.

MATCH.

Duke: 1

Idiots: 0

 

[ExigeEvan]

Game.

Set.

MATCH.

Duke: 1

Idiots: 0

Alot of people have attacked the idea of the thread, and it is very weak, but why did you have to attack GM directly?

No personal attacks on other members will be tolerated.

 

[GM]

Whys everyone trying to take this thread the wrong way?

I did'nt make it to be like the 'Corrupt The Wish' thread or 'Rate The Above Avatar'.

 

[Evolution.]

Alot of people have attacked the idea of the thread, and it is very weak, but why did you have to attack GM directly?

I didn't. I said idiots, I did not specify which idiots. Duke has owned many idiots here.

 

[GM]

I think it's quite clear that by idiots you mean me, since after the post Duke said about me, you say:

Duke 1
Idiots 0

 

[Evolution.]

I think it's quite clear that by idiots you mean me, since after the post Duke said about me, you say:

Duke 1
Idiots 0

Idiots is plural, therefore, I must not have been talking about just you, unless you have a clone.

 

[Pebb]

Yeah. Another stupid thread.

It's also stupid because you could not survive in the Sahara for a month with no water. Hell. You wouldn't last a week without water.

You could survive in the rainforest for quite a long time.

And there's not enough, anyway I choose:

Amazon Rainforest

Because I like rain a lot, and it cools you down when you go for a hard run.

 

[WallRunner]

i voted rain forest, and plus, if everybody who voted rain forest lived in the rain forest, they couldn't cut it down.

beware my master plan:idea:

From your rain forest saving friend,
Wall51
200

 

[Dave A]

Idiots is plural, therefore, I must not have been talking about just you, unless you have a clone.

Insulting a single member or a group of members (ie by pluralising the insult) is no different, both are verbal attacks on a member.

 

[Evolution.]

Insulting a single member or a group of members (ie by pluralising the insult) is no different, both are verbal attacks on a member.

Who said the idiots were GTP members?

Hmmm?

 

[Kylehnat]

I pick the Amazon. In the Sahara, you have no chance of survival. In the Brazilian rainforest, you have a much greater (albeit still tiny) chance of survival. I think it would be better to pit the Amazon against a Kevin Federline concert. The choice would not be as clear, though I suspect that most people would take their chances and still pick Amazon.

 

[Evolution.]

I pick the Amazon. In the Sahara, you have no chance of survival. In the Brazilian rainforest, you have a much greater (albeit still tiny) chance of survival. I think it would be better to pit the Amazon against a Kevin Federline concert. The choice would not be as clear, though I suspect that most people would take their chances and still pick Amazon.

So true.

 

[ExigeEvan]

Game.

Set.

MATCH.

Duke: 1

Idiots: 0

I didn't. I said idiots, I did not specify which idiots. Duke has owned many idiots here.

So why is the score only 1-0?

But yes, would have to be the Amazon. I've watched enough of Ray Mears to survive for atleast a week.... I think.

 

[Tornado]

It's also stupid because you could not survive in the Sahara for a month with no water. Hell. You wouldn't last a week without water.
You could survive in the rainforest for quite a long time.

I'm quite sure that trained soldiers couldn't survive a month in the Amazon rainforest. At least in the desert there is less in the way of animals, and there is water if you know where to look.

 

[Evolution.]

I'm quite sure that trained soldiers couldn't survive a month in the Amazon rainforest. At least in the desert there is less in the way of animals, and there is water if you know where to look.

There are also more venomous snakes than you would want to deal with.

Not saying the Amazon wouldn't have any, but come on. Rattlesnakes aren't fun to even look at, let alone deal with.

 

[Delirious]

Neither.

Anything about 80 degrees I hate.

Next time, put places that are bone-shattering cold and I'll vote gladly.

 

[Jim Prower]

Sahara....

on a secret air base. oh, yeah.

and I hate bugs and muggy conditions. got enough of that in Central IL.

 

[GJB93]

Amazon. Just seems like the more reasonable place. And I like the sound of rain when you're under trees. Calms me down. I dont really think this thread is all that pointless IMO. Could be interesting. I think you can find water in the sahara if you dig. You an sometimes find water. You can also get water from inside a cactus. Heres a question. If you're were in a desert with a canteen half full with water, would you:

A) Drink all the water
B) Reserve the water

 

[Omnis]

There's no point in reserving water. Also, cactuses yield less water than you think. Usually they're poisonous and can swell your tongue, causing you to choke.

I'd go to the Amazon, definitely. Water is plentiful, there are lots of fruits and stuff, and if I had a big enough spear or gun or something, I could probably kill animals. I would need to figure out how to create fire, though. That could be hard in the moist climate. With fire, I could ward animals away as well. The thing that I think would be the worst about the amazon is the mosquitoes. The bites and the possibility of malaria would be devastating. (Unless you're my dad. Bugs never bite him. He says it's because he's evil.)

 

[GJB93]

Good facts there 👍 I told you the thread could get interesting

 

[Slicks]

There's no point in reserving water. Also, cactuses yield less water than you think. Usually they're poisonous and can swell your tongue, causing you to choke.

I'd go to the Amazon, definitely. Water is plentiful, there are lots of fruits and stuff, and if I had a big enough spear or gun or something, I could probably kill animals. I would need to figure out how to create fire, though. That could be hard in the moist climate. With fire, I could ward animals away as well. The thing that I think would be the worst about the amazon is the mosquitoes. The bites and the possibility of malaria would be devastating. (Unless you're my dad. Bugs never bite him. He says it's because he's evil.)

OK, but here's the problem with water in the Amazon: It is not uncommon to find bacteria/parasites in the water in any jungle. Chances are that once you've consumed a weeks' worth of it, you'll have injested something deadly.

 

[Omnis]

If I had fire, I would distill the water, or boil it before I drank it.

And being nude and covered in animal blood with a hooded cape of raw leopard hide and a 10-inch hunting blade clenched between your teeth sure beats the hell out of munching sand and chasing vultures.

 

[OZZYGT]

Amazon does it for me...and as far as girls are concerned....i'm sick enough to relief on one of those sexy looking female chimpanzees!




Ciao!

P.S. It's good to be back