New Acura NSX in GT5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter suvalle55
  • 384 comments
  • 35,659 views
A typically indirect, not very informative vague video release from PD.

People are already seeing all kinds of things, including "revisions" to existing tracks in the game. :lol:
Unlikely, at best.

What do I think this video means? Nothing. Just something to grab attention. (It worked, by the way) ;)

This. I wouldn't jump to conclusions that we're getting this track or that. Didn't we also see El Capitan in some pre-release videos or pictures? That didn't make it into the game. Didn't we have a picture or video of yet another track that ended up being excluded from the game? I also remember the huge uproar when logos for classic tracks like Midfield were found hidden on PD's website. That ended up going nowhere too.
 
The track looks great. We need a proper video of whole lap and replay view. The car looks bad and will not have cockpit view as well. But probably will be free.
 
Are you serious, Honda? After the all famous and exotic honda NSX, you come with thĂ­s being it's follower?

Call me stupid, but what went wrong with Honda? How could they let this
Acura-NSX-Study-1.jpg

....be the follow up of this?!
honda-nsx-r-side-2_70.jpg


I don't like the styling at all of this NSX concept. It looks way too bulky and resembles more the Audi R8 than the old and original honda NSX.....wth happened to Honda? :(


(Nevertheless, if the tracks come available, i will buy them instantely....Not sure about the car though, the styling is terrible to have the name 'NSX' associated with it! :()
 
Does anyone realize how long the new test track will be? Oh and this also points out the obvious fact that these pics are both from the same track. :P

wBMgB.png

Yes it's long and it appears to be one track but look at that ship...the PDI Line, containers full with new content, yummy. ;)
 
Are you serious, Honda? After the all famous and exotic honda NSX, you come with thĂ­s being it's follower?

Call me stupid, but what went wrong with Honda? How could they let this
Acura-NSX-Study-1.jpg

....be the follow up of this?!
honda-nsx-r-side-2_70.jpg


I don't like the styling at all of this NSX concept. It looks way too bulky and resembles more the Audi R8 than the old and original honda NSX.....wth happened to Honda? :(


(Nevertheless, if the tracks come available, i will buy them instantely....Not sure about the car though, the styling is terrible to have the name 'NSX' associated with it! :()

Well, it is 2012 right?
 
Don't we already have 3 or 4 threads for this already? :confused:

I made this before the news came out. and I was the 2nd to post about it. the 1st one should have been put into this thread to begin with. It was simply a video just like this.. At least I put it in the correct forum area.
 
If this car truly is in an unrestricted class when it races at the Nurburgring, and it has less than 500 hp, and it's not getting beat.... then I think GM needs to show up in a race prepared ZR1. I seriously doubt the fuel mileage advantage this car has would hold up against something with nearly double the horsepower.
It has 472hp, but can make 672Hp because the hybrid flywheel in it produces 200Hp at the push of a button.

It's cute you're also proposing the Horsepower>Everything else idea. Circuit racing isn't about straight out horsepower. Otherwise, there would be straight wins by the 703hp 908 over the 590Hp Audi.
...and yes, there are less complicated ways to push a button for a boost of horsepower. Nitrous is one of them, using methanol with a turbocharged car is another. Active aero can have a similar effect (think F1).
Do you not read anything or do you just skim posts & not use common sense?

They are not going to produce production cars with an actual nitrous system. Again, learn what KERS is & why it's used. Hint: It's environmentally friendly.

Jav
I just can't stand that stupid smiley face! Come on, what real and serious super car would look like that? Just ridiculous! Honda has an oportunity to gain some respect back, so far thy've blown it with this souless thing.

This. It looks heavy and way too futuristic. No soul whatsoever. I still prefer the first generation.

Also look at the new Honda Beat. It's FF, not MR. Like a del Slo...
Soulless? You 2 know nothing about how this car drives, so how do you know it's soulless?

Oh right, just more assumptions based on nothing.
I have no idea about Le Mans. I'm kinda being led to believe that this 24 hours of Nurburgring has very few restrictions on what teams can do to their cars. If this 911 is winning in mostly unrestricted classes then they should be coming up against vastly more powerful cars. If that's actually the case, that the hybrid Porsche is beating more powerful cars.... then I'm on my way to conceding the point, but I just don't think that's likely to be true.
The Porsche 911 has come up against more powerful cars at the race, even without the Hybrid technology. The LF-A that enters the VLN produces 560Hp. A Ford GT that has entered produced 550Hp+. The Audi R8 LMS enters with 490Hp.

And yet, for the past 6 years (excluding 2010 when BMW won), a Porsche 911 has won the event. 2010 would have been won as well had the Hybrid not suffered a piston failure in the final hour.

Again, circuit racing is not about all out horsepower, esp. not in endurance racing. Get that mindset out of here.
The only point I'm trying to make is that I question the idea that hybrid technology is outright superior when it's compared to cars that aren't allowed to fully develop their own cars because they're restricted by a set of rules and regulations.
I gave you the most perfect example of this hybrid car vs. the conventional car.

Porsche 911 GT3R (472Hp) vs. Porsche 911 GT3R Hybrid (472Hp+200Hp Hybrid flywheel). In 2010, before the air restrictor & weight penalties, the GT3R Hybrid lead the race for 8 hours unmatched compared to Manthey. Take note right here that for the majority of the race, the Hybrid is running 472Hp. It can only use the extra 200 horses for 6-8 seconds at most, which means it's used for passing only (as it is in F1). The reason it does so well in addition to is because it's more aerodynamic, lighter, & all-wheel drive.
 
Last edited:
It
Soulless? You 2 know nothing about how this car drives, so how do you know it's soulless?

No we don't, we are going strictly by the same info you are. You have your opinion, we have ours simple as that!
 
I guess I'm the only one who isn't entirely sold on the new track, I've never used the old TT oval in GT4 for anything other than events that used it, that new oval will just be neat for the first one or two time you drive on it then you realize it's just another Daytona oval.
 
Jav
No we don't, we are going strictly by the same info you are. You have your opinion, we have ours simple as that!
You're basing your opinion on information that has nothing to do with the car's "soul", which is stupid & ignorant.

Until they review how this car actually drives & how it performs in the real world, nobody knows if it has soul or not.
 
Jav
And it won't sell because the cr-z is a flop to begin with, and the k20 motor, no matter how much it stirs the genitilia of a honda fan, will be obsolete in emission standards worldwide soon.
Are you 100% sure about that? Last I checked it was one of the cleanest burning lowest emission engines... Offcourse when you delete all the cats and emission control systems it can become a bit dirty like any other engine.

I have no idea what the K20 has to do with the CR-Z anyway. It's got a special derivative of the L15 engine, the LEA. The L series replaced the D series, so it's a small car / efficient engine, wheras the K is for their larger and / or sportier cars (the K effectively replaced the Bs, Fs and Hs at about the same time the L appeared). Engines are updated during their lifetimes all the time.

I'm really curious about the details of this concept's direct injection V6; i.e. is it the same as the one announced recently? (3.5 litre, ~310 bhp, ~270 lbf.ft)

I guess the benefits of sports hybrids are that you can use these economic engines, and rely on the energy recovery and electric motors for the extra punch, easily 150+ bhp.
 
I wouldn't jump to conclusions that we're getting this track or that. Didn't we also see El Capitan in some pre-release videos or pictures? That didn't make it into the game. Didn't we have a picture or video of yet another track that ended up being excluded from the game? I also remember the huge uproar when logos for classic tracks like Midfield were found hidden on PD's website. That ended up going nowhere too.
We got all of two DLCs so far, one with an extremely popular new track, and you're announcing the death of GT5 DLC now? ;)

Bit premature, don't you think?
 
YellowG1
I wouldn't jump to conclusions that we're getting this track or that. Didn't we also see El Capitan in some pre-release videos or pictures? That didn't make it into the game. Didn't we have a picture or video of yet another track that ended up being excluded from the game? I also remember the huge uproar when logos for classic tracks like Midfield were found hidden on PD's website. That ended up going nowhere too.
Excellent points.
Just because it's in a video doesn't mean we're getting it anytime soon. We might, but we also might not.

We got all of two DLCs so far, one with an extremely popular new track, and you're announcing the death of GT5 DLC now? ;)

Bit premature, don't you think?
Way to put words in his fingers.:dunce:

Please show where in this quote he announced "the death of GT5 DLC".
Pathetic response to something that wasn't even close to having been said. Not even vaguely, remotely, almost, kind of, nothing at all. Just making 🤬 up... again.
 
Let me guess... This was an American design? My god is it ugly. Stick a GM badge on it and be done.

Shame. Lets hope the production model looks more like the old one and less like this rubbish. Still I bet it will drive brilliantly.
 
This. I wouldn't jump to conclusions that we're getting this track or that. Didn't we also see El Capitan in some pre-release videos or pictures? That didn't make it into the game. Didn't we have a picture or video of yet another track that ended up being excluded from the game? I also remember the huge uproar when logos for classic tracks like Midfield were found hidden on PD's website. That ended up going nowhere too.

El Capitán was in the "Horsepower" video by Red Bull; it was unofficial, later removed from their website, and was probably lifted from GTPSP's intro anyway.

GT5 isn't dead yet; these things may yet lead somewhere. But you're right, we shouldn't jump to conclusions and certainly not get our hopes up! :p
 
Let me guess... This was an American design? My god is it ugly. Stick a GM badge on it and be done.

Shame. Lets hope the production model looks more like the old one and less like this rubbish. Still I bet it will drive brilliantly.

You seriously think Honda allowed Americans to design the NSX all by themselves? :lol:
I think it's gorgeous, by the way.
 
Last edited:
The visual design, yes. But I am just guessing based the horrible looks. Does anyone know who actually did the body styling?
So only Americans can design an ugly car? Are you seriously saying that?
Or are you saying Japanese cannot design an ugly car?

Either way it's prejudice. A big 👎 to you.
 
I thought all Hondas were designed in the USA these days? I'm pretty sure they have a division somewhere that does nothing but churn out designs. I can't remember where I read that, though.

Most modern cars are designed "by committee", of course (mostly because of safety regulations, but also company image concerns... HSV stand up).

EDIT: that's what happened to Toyota's new 86, too...
 
Way to put words in his fingers.:dunce:
My, aren't you all kinds of hypersensitive lately. ;)

Dude, his position is that we've seen all kinds of tracks and cars in videos, and haven't seen blade grass or fender of about any of them. As if we've been getting DLC all along now, never mind that the FT-86 did manage to mosy our way. I think someone needs to cut back on the sugar and caffeine or something. Actually, I need to un-cut back on some racing...
 
Back