Just because he wasn't convicted doesn't mean he didn't do it, you know.
When you look at the FACTS, you see the signs pointing to him raping this
Well let's see here, he followed the girl into the ladies bathroom, an underage girl who he was feeding drinks to. The girl was obviously loaded and not in control of herself. Even if he didn't actually PENETRATE her (required for rape in georgia) he still had clear intentions following her into the bathroom like that and having his guards block her friend out. The security tape from the night in question also mysteriously disappeared before it could be investigated. Sounds like a bunch of steps an innocent man would take, right?
Nah, he's innocent just because there was a lack of evidence. Clearly he didn't do it, right? Lack of evidence, most of which had already been cleaned up by the two PENNSYLVANIA STATE TROOPERS who he hired as security.
Oh yeah, and the Georgia officer who first investigated the crime has resigned.
Also he's been accused of sexual assault twice in the past year now. Money can buy you out of a lot of trouble sometimes too.
I make my own conclusions, pal. If he looks like a rapist, smells like a rapist, and acts like a rapist, he probably is. It sounds like you are the one who is ignoring the facts?
But yeah, I'm just buying into the media hype.