- 4,543
- Bay Area, CA
- Zenith113
Now explain to me why people say .40 S&W have snappy recoil damnit.![]()
I believe it's due to it being a high pressure round. The .40S&W is SAAMI rated at 35,000psi, .45 Auto is 20,000psi.
Now explain to me why people say .40 S&W have snappy recoil damnit.![]()
What kind of mags does it take? AR mags would be cheap.....
I don't know how it would work for your rifle, but for my AR, I was considering Condor 42" case.
Also, nice gun @Brett!
The Tavor takes surplus STANAG, P-Mags, or whatever. Just trying to decide if I should go with P-Mags or Lancer AWM. It does not have the same compability problems that the AUG or F2000 has with magazines.
I believe it's due to it being a high pressure round. The .40S&W is SAAMI rated at 35,000psi, .45 Auto is 20,000psi.
I just ran the numbers and calculated the recoil:
40 S&W: 165 @ 1150 @ 485 ft lbs
.45ACP: 230 @ 830 @ 350 ft lbs
9x19: 124 @ 1200 @ 382 ft lbs
Recoil: Glock 17, 1.6lbs, unloaded. (I used 7 grains as powder charge for all cartridges)
40S&W: 9.39 ft lbs - recoil velocity 19.44 fps
.45ACP: 9.49 ft lbs - recoil velocity 19.54 fps
9x19: 6.19 ft lbs - recoil velocity: 15.79 fps
Very similar, except the 9x19 which as 1/3 less recoil than the big boys. According to the calculator 40 and 45 should feel exactly the same as recoil force AND speed are equal.
Very cool. 👍The Tavor takes surplus STANAG, P-Mags, or whatever. Just trying to decide if I should go with P-Mags or Lancer AWM. It does not have the same compability problems that the AUG or F2000 has with magazines.
Not that I'm recommending the product or anything, but that Condor also comes in 36" size.That is probably a little on the large side. Remember my rifle is only 26 1/8" long.
CCI box says 40 grain 1070fps, standard velocity, round nose. These guys worked good. I do need to keep track of the mags for sure. 👍Were the CCI rounds minimags (and non hollow point)? If those don't work in the gun I don't know what willAs far as .22 semi's go I've never heard anything particularly bad about the SR22. I'd definitely try to get another new magazine or two and keep track of that stuff.
I haven't inspected the unfired ammo. So far, I've probably shot something like 400~500 rounds, but it's a guess.How many rounds do you think you've had through that gun so far? I know it's easier said than done right now but you might want to track down something a little hotter like the minimags (think they are 1250 fps) to see if they cycle more reliably. Have you ever ejected an unfired lead nose round after chambering it to see if there's any visible damage from some sort of hang up happening?
You are full of good ideas.I'd also be curious then if it still does that if you load one less round into the magazine.
I do plan on that, unless this is a problem I can reasonably work around. Thanks bro. 👍It's the standard "failure to X" playbookGlad to help out! .22 semi pistols can be pretty picky but this sounds like a consistent issue from what you've described. If nothing else I'd give Ruger a call and see what they say. They are supposed to be awesome on the customer service side.
What it's doing is, it fails to load the second round into the chamber. It's weird, it only does it on the second round(first round the gun itself has to load). I've yet to try any minimags, as I haven't found any. Standard velocity CCI worked fine. High velocity American Eagle, or Federal in general it doesn't seem to like.
I totally bought the claim by Ruger how SR22 pretty much ate anything, but good chance you may be right. For plinking, it's not at all a big deal to me, but for defensive purposes, I would buy CCI Mini-Mags once they start circulating again.I have had this problem with my P22 with the second round. It only did it with a Federal HV Match rounds. The P22, and I would say by extension, the SR22, is very picky on what ammunition it will reliably cycle. The P22 does wonderfully with CCI Mini-Mags. CCI Standard Velocity also work pretty well, but not quite as well as Mini Mags.
Well, the snap should be explained with the speed of the recoil, which is pretty much the same.
Is it more snappy because it has 485 ft lbs of force compared to the 9 and the 45? That's more torque around the fulcrum (wrist), but with similar recoil push at 19fps.
Don't really follow what __ @ ___ means without units listed.