- 6,490
- Nantes
- P308R
Something to look forward to 👍 I enjoyed GTA5 single player but the western setting is a big plus 
View attachment 598145
Got some bad news for ya... "on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One systems."
I was more wondering if it would also appear on PS3/X360
So, uh... Guess I should play RDR at some point in the next year then, huh?
Definitely, the game may start to feel a bit tedious after a few sessions but once you head back up north it becomes a great game. I hope you've made it to this point without having the game spoilt for you, if you have avoid spoilers at all costs.So, uh... Guess I should play RDR at some point in the next year then, huh?
*slaps SlipZtrEm on the wrists for not having done so already*![]()
Definitely, the game may start to feel a bit tedious after a few sessions but once you head back up north it becomes a great game. I hope you've made it to this point without having the game spoilt for you, if you have avoid spoilers at all costs.
I was supremely late joining the last generation (got my PS3 summer 2010), so I've missed out on quite a lot of games that came out before a certain fifth iteration of a popular racing series...
First wasn't on PC, don't see why it would change with the sequel.
Exactly my thoughts, with that considered it would be a surprise if the game didn't come out on PC eventually as well. Rockstar would be losing out on hundreds of millions of dollars in microtransactions by not making a PC version.GTA-O reportedly makes Rockstar nearly $1B/year through microtransactions. There is no way they are not doing RDR-O
Me also, but seeing as I still have my PS3 I'm sure I'll be able to find the time to play the first one before 2 is releasedI also missed out on RDR first time around so I can't wait to play the second one. Especially after enjoying GTAV.
I have never heard of a major release that was published within months of its announcement. It was always going to be about a year between announcement and release.That's a longer wait than i hoped.
So it's a continuation of the story?
It's supposed to be a prequel, that's what I'm hearing. I'm ok with online, as long as the single player campaign doesn't suffer because of it. I wasn't impressed with GTA V's single player campaign, it was alright but could of been a lot better. RDR is one of my favorite games ever, this one has some big shoes to fill, for me anyways.So it's a continuation of the story? can't wait to see what they've done, welcome to this generation R*.
That sounds fantastic, but they'd never do it. It's unfortunate that they - and so many other developers - seem intent on relying purely on American history in games. Assassin's Creed III was presented as being significant and profound, but was incoherent to me, and I had no awareness of the historical significance of parts of Fallout 4.Another idea is 1890s South Africa. In a few years, South Africa became the supply for more than 20% of the world's gold. Again, crime ran rampant. Not to mention the constant fight for survival in a desert environment, and the many dangerous and almost fantastical beasts of central and Southern Africa. Along with fighting and existing with African tribes, and the growing animosity between British and Dutch settlers.
After me telling all how much i loved RDR, most people suggested Creed III. However, I wasn't convinced by the handful of reviews I read.That sounds fantastic, but they'd never do it. It's unfortunate that they - and so many other developers - seem intent on relying purely on American history in games. Assassin's Creed III was presented as being significant and profound, but was incoherent to me, and I had no awareness of the historical significance of parts of Fallout 4.
AC3 was horrible. It felt like a really dry history lecture. But IV seamlessly mixes land exploration with naval combat, which is a lot of fun. However, the series has really poor replay value.After me telling all how much i loved RDR, most people suggested Creed III. However, I wasn't convinced by the handful of reviews I read.