- 3,760
- rollazn
Heres a website with very recent spyshots.
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?n=156,178&sid=178
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?n=156,178&sid=178
87chevyFerrari Imola: wow this car could cause me to loose all respect for The Italian car God, they built a Porsche.......... what has the world come too.........![]()
240ZIsn't that the original Aztek? The Rendezvous comment would seem to support this, as well as the date.
240ZWasn't the cladding-less model first released as a "GT" package or something similar?
87chevyFerrari Imola: wow this car could cause me to loose all respect for The Italian car God, they built a Porsche.......... what has the world come too.........![]()
M5PowerNah - though the Aztek was sold in 2001 as a base and a GT model. The GT was a bit different (16" alloy wheels instead of 15" wheels did a bit for the styling) and was better-equipped, but I'm pretty sure it was still cladded. In 2002, pleading for sales, they dropped trim levels and cladding.
16" Rims a bit small for an SUV?M5PowerNah - though the Aztek was sold in 2001 as a base and a GT model. The GT was a bit different (16" alloy wheels instead of 15" wheels did a bit for the styling) and was better-equipped, but I'm pretty sure it was still cladded. In 2002, pleading for sales, they dropped trim levels and cladding.
Opps I will fix that right now.240ZNot really for an Aztek. What is that garbage in your signature?
240Ztags needed.[/QUOTE] Yeah its fixed now forgot about that.