"Standards" the good, the bad and the ugly

Discussion in 'Gran Turismo 6' started by bodger, Nov 29, 2013.

  1. SuperShouden

    SuperShouden (Banned)

    Messages:
    7,542
  2. eSZee

    eSZee

    Messages:
    11,214
    Location:
    United States
    CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM:
    Might want to play around with the exposure a bit.
     
  3. swynder

    swynder

    Messages:
    950
    Location:
    Portugal
    No problem... Great work with those GT5/GT6 comparisions BTW.:tup:
     
  4. Mikhail K

    Mikhail K

    Messages:
    119
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2014
  5. FT-1

    FT-1 Premium

    Messages:
    7,460
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    There are hardly any differences between the 2000 & 2004 model year Z06, couldn't they have just copied over the premium body without the interior as they did with the DB9 and MX-5 (NA)?
     
  6. Ignition

    Ignition

    Messages:
    79
    Logic isn't PD's strong point.
     
  7. TCSTigersClaw

    TCSTigersClaw

    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Greece
    They copy pasted the bodies of premium miatas to the standard ones.In Photomode ,side by side they are the exact same model minus the tinted windows.

    They probably *should* have copy pasted other similar models :p
     
    Tenacious D likes this.
  8. challengerrt10

    challengerrt10

    Messages:
    239
    Location:
    Poland
    They should have deleted Z06 C5 2000 because in many races (arcade, career) A.I. use this version instead of premium 2004.
     
    JoaoSilva likes this.
  9. GranTurismoer

    GranTurismoer

    Messages:
    336
    It really is becoming quite the mess between all these levels of "quality", what I want most from GT7 is consistency!
     
    LMSCorvetteGT2 and andrewyhy like this.
  10. MXH

    MXH Premium

    Messages:
    2,970
    Location:
    Sweden
    Agreed. While improving the standard cars is in my opinion much welcomed, judging by the pictures Mikhail provided thus far, it has become a mess due the amount of variation in quality between them.

    You have your awful Alto, Falken GT-R and Ford Falcon XR8. Then you have your just barely and/or slightly touched up standard cars, followed by the ''semi-premium'' models such as the RUF Yellowbird - as well the rest of the RUF line-up. And lastly, you have your premium models. All in all, you end up with five or so levels of quality, if we're being really picky.

    With that said, I still do approve of PD improving them. I just wish there was less inconsistency regarding the quality of the cars. (It's nice to wish things, isn't it?)
     
    Tenacious D likes this.
  11. zzz_pt

    zzz_pt

    Messages:
    8,010
    Location:
    Germany
    RUF BTR




    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]



    ...
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2014
  12. forzaturismo

    forzaturismo

    Messages:
    530
    Location:
    France
     
  13. GTPorsche

    GTPorsche

    Messages:
    21,251
    That's the BTR, not the CTR.
     
  14. zzz_pt

    zzz_pt

    Messages:
    8,010
    Location:
    Germany
    Thanks mate ;)

    @forzaturismo he color is Verde Ithaca
     
    Racedriver117 and JoaoSilva like this.
  15. forzaturismo

    forzaturismo

    Messages:
    530
    Location:
    France
    Merci :)
     
  16. Zlork

    Zlork

    Messages:
    2,617
    Please, can you make a comparison of the FTO Touring Car ? Thank you in advance
     
    Ignition likes this.
  17. RandomCarGuy17

    RandomCarGuy17

    Messages:
    15,547
    Location:
    United States
    PD does seem to have no logic, what I don't get is why they didn't attempt to premiumize the other 3 R230 Mercs, they could've simply edited the premium R230 SL55 AMG to make the other 3. The same goes for the Evo VI Lancers & Evo V that are still standard.

    BTW; some standard car pictures.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2014
  18. eran0004

    eran0004 Premium

    Messages:
    9,356
    Question: Was the VW Bora semi-premium (if we're still using that term?) before the last update? I just noticed it in the dealership and it looks pretty good for a standard car.

    Edit: Took a closer look in photomode, and the textures are still low resolution and there are no modeled panel gaps. So it's not as good as it looked in the dealership.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2014
  19. RandomCarGuy17

    RandomCarGuy17

    Messages:
    15,547
    Location:
    United States
    Nope, I bought one to check and it looked very jaggy around some areas. I'll go check my bora though and report back.
     
  20. sid_chiclana

    sid_chiclana

    Messages:
    2,249
    Location:
    England
    Does anybody know if any of the old 350z's have been updated?
    Thanks in advance and good work everybody :p
     
  21. RandomCarGuy17

    RandomCarGuy17

    Messages:
    15,547
    Location:
    United States
    The 350Z looks a bit jagged around the doors in the dealership, but I noticed that the front hood has a little gap between the body panels.

    As for the VW Bora, it still looks as bad as it did before when upclose.
     
    sid_chiclana likes this.
  22. BloodyThunderX

    BloodyThunderX

    Messages:
    151
    Location:
    Canada
    [​IMG]

    Dear god this is atrocious.
     
  23. Sage Ages

    Sage Ages

    Messages:
    12,482
    Anyone know exactly which cars can get carbon hoods?
     
  24. Raggi Boy

    Raggi Boy

    Messages:
    135
    Looking at the real thing makes it look even more disgusting

    gallery_articles_Nissan_350Z_Option_Stream_Z_03.jpg
     
  25. Vitocorp

    Vitocorp

    Messages:
    910
    I dont know but every time I look at this car I remember the good old days in GT4, "nice" to see it looks EXACTLY like in GT4... :rolleyes:
     
    Harsk100 and LMSCorvetteGT2 like this.
  26. Furinkazen

    Furinkazen Premium

    Messages:
    44,058
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Someone should be very sorry for making the Jaguar XFR look so fugly.
     
    Tenacious D and Connorman95 like this.
  27. Connorman95

    Connorman95 (Banned)

    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    United States
    Gemasolar.jpg I love living in 2014! -_- WTF GT2.5
     
  28. omgsean1

    omgsean1

    Messages:
    418
    Location:
    United States
    That's worst looking standard car from GT4 and GT5.
     
    SaulWolfden and Connorman95 like this.
  29. Terje

    Terje

    Messages:
    137
    What car is that?
     
  30. FT-1

    FT-1 Premium

    Messages:
    7,460
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Looks like a Daihatsu Sirion. Dates back to GT3...