Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Gran Turismo 6' started by bodger, Nov 29, 2013.
Might want to play around with the exposure a bit.
No problem... Great work with those GT5/GT6 comparisions BTW.
Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C5) '00 GT5 Standard /GT6 updated Standard Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C5) '04 GT6 Premium
Links to all comparison shots in this thread >>>
There are hardly any differences between the 2000 & 2004 model year Z06, couldn't they have just copied over the premium body without the interior as they did with the DB9 and MX-5 (NA)?
Logic isn't PD's strong point.
They copy pasted the bodies of premium miatas to the standard ones.In Photomode ,side by side they are the exact same model minus the tinted windows.
They probably *should* have copy pasted other similar models
They should have deleted Z06 C5 2000 because in many races (arcade, career) A.I. use this version instead of premium 2004.
It really is becoming quite the mess between all these levels of "quality", what I want most from GT7 is consistency!
Agreed. While improving the standard cars is in my opinion much welcomed, judging by the pictures Mikhail provided thus far, it has become a mess due the amount of variation in quality between them.
You have your awful Alto, Falken GT-R and Ford Falcon XR8. Then you have your just barely and/or slightly touched up standard cars, followed by the ''semi-premium'' models such as the RUF Yellowbird - as well the rest of the RUF line-up. And lastly, you have your premium models. All in all, you end up with five or so levels of quality, if we're being really picky.
With that said, I still do approve of PD improving them. I just wish there was less inconsistency regarding the quality of the cars. (It's nice to wish things, isn't it?)
That's the BTR, not the CTR.
@forzaturismo he color is Verde Ithaca
Please, can you make a comparison of the FTO Touring Car ? Thank you in advance
PD does seem to have no logic, what I don't get is why they didn't attempt to premiumize the other 3 R230 Mercs, they could've simply edited the premium R230 SL55 AMG to make the other 3. The same goes for the Evo VI Lancers & Evo V that are still standard.
BTW; some standard car pictures.
Question: Was the VW Bora semi-premium (if we're still using that term?) before the last update? I just noticed it in the dealership and it looks pretty good for a standard car.
Edit: Took a closer look in photomode, and the textures are still low resolution and there are no modeled panel gaps. So it's not as good as it looked in the dealership.
Nope, I bought one to check and it looked very jaggy around some areas. I'll go check my bora though and report back.
Does anybody know if any of the old 350z's have been updated?
Thanks in advance and good work everybody
The 350Z looks a bit jagged around the doors in the dealership, but I noticed that the front hood has a little gap between the body panels.
As for the VW Bora, it still looks as bad as it did before when upclose.
Dear god this is atrocious.
Anyone know exactly which cars can get carbon hoods?
Looking at the real thing makes it look even more disgusting
I dont know but every time I look at this car I remember the good old days in GT4, "nice" to see it looks EXACTLY like in GT4...
Someone should be very sorry for making the Jaguar XFR look so fugly.
I love living in 2014! -_- WTF GT2.5
That's worst looking standard car from GT4 and GT5.
What car is that?
Looks like a Daihatsu Sirion. Dates back to GT3...