- 5,770
- Anoka, MN
It's too bad they don't offer the current 2.5 engine in the upper trim levels, to sort of bridge the gap between the base 2.0 and the WRX.
Which 2.5 engine would that be?It's too bad they don't offer the current 2.5 engine in the upper trim levels, to sort of bridge the gap between the base 2.0 and the WRX.
America's semi-fascination with Subaru even though they've not produced anything worth buying, BRZ aside, in the last 15 years, continues to baffle me.
I was going to make that joke myself but wondered if it actually applied any more.You know how America likes to watch girls kiss? Same reason why Subarus sell. Lesbians.
The one used in the Forester and Legacy/Outback. Has 170-175hp vs the 148 in the Impreza 2.0.Which 2.5 engine would that be?
Ah okay, I forgot that engine existed and was thinking of the EJ25 instead.The one used in the Forester and Legacy/Outback. Has 170-175hp vs the 148 in the Impreza 2.0.
I was going to make that joke myself but wondered if it actually applied any more.
I was going to make that joke myself but wondered if it actually applied any more.
America's semi-fascination with Subaru even though they've not produced anything worth buying, BRZ aside, in the last 15 years, continues to baffle me. The availability of AWD for those in the snowbelt states must be the extent of it, though if any other manufacturer decided to produce relatively affordable cars with AWD the market for Subarus would disappear overnight.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/2015-subaru-wrx-sti-wrx-wagon-on-the-way.262535/Didn't know where to put this
SUBARU is believed to be working on a family of smaller horizontally opposed boxer engines for its new Impreza range as it broadens the line-up to take on Europe’s best small cars.
Expected to be between 1.2 and 1.6 litres in size, the engines would be offered in various outputs in naturally aspirated and turbocharged configurations to help the company’s smallest model address ever-more stringent emissions regulations surrounding carbon dioxide pollution.
AUSTRALIAN Subaru fans can relax – the WRX STI is here for the long haul, despite an announcement by Subaru UK that the performance flagship is reaching the end of the line in Britain.
The ageing STI with its port-injected 2.5-litre turbocharged boxer engine has fallen victim to tightening green-vehicle rules in Europe where a Euro 6 exhaust emission standard is mandatory and car companies must achieve average carbon-dioxide emissions of 130 grams per kilometre across their new-car fleet or face financial penalties.
In Australia, the Euro 5-compliant STI can continue on the market until a replacement happens along, probably about 2020, unless new mandatory Euro 6 laws intervene. By that time, the engine – code-named EJ257 – will have been around for about 12 years.
Not surprised by the lack of power increase in the BRZ/FRS/GT86 but $13k more in the STI for 5 hp?Subaru WRX STI Type RA pricing confirmed. Starts at $48,995, $13k more than a normal STI.
http://www.carscoops.com/2017/12/subaru-brz-ts-and-wrx-sti-type-ra.html
Hell naw. The standard WRX STI is already too close to being on the expensive side when compared to its rivals (at least in Canada). $13K for the RA is hard to justify.Starts at $48,995, $13k more than a normal STI.
What?Just let it die.
What?
Each one gets further away from what an STI should be...
That's not exactly what I'd call a strong justification. The Recaros can be had on the regular WRX STI too. The only item you listed that I would want from the factory is the carbon fibre roof since I can see the difficulties in installing an aftermarket one. Of course you can also risk the chance that it will go up in value in the future, but that's only if you have enough money to waste.It's justified if one has the money for it.
To each their own. I happen to think the current WRX STI is a really appropriate modern successor to the GC8; it looks mean and still drives great. Obviously, the car still has some issues, but I'd rather Subaru/STI attempt to rectify these things and improve the product rather than killing off the firm's only existing automotive icon.Each one gets further away from what an STI should be, they're ugly as sin and the don't have UELs. Just do like they did with the Levorg and let it be something else.