- 1,433
- Northern Ireland
Sauber didn't apply for the name change in time for it to be allowed.
My mistake, thanks for the correction.
Sauber didn't apply for the name change in time for it to be allowed.
No one called it that, but SPEED talked about it pre-season and in the official articles like the constructors table used the full title.Except nobody called it "BMW Sauber Ferrari" in 2010 unless they had some extreme form of pedantic behavior which disallowed bathroom use for at least a decade.
Because it was the formal name.No one called it that, but SPEED talked about it pre-season and in the official articles like the constructors table used the full title.
View attachment 314534 Edit: this was funny to me
Smoke is definitely still emanating from the Force India. Would it be harsh to suggest this doesn't really matter given it's the old car, and really the frustrated people here will be the other teams who have brought a relevant chassis and engine with them?
Good to hear! They may be a back marker but I'm glad the attempt to block them has been thwarted.Manor - as Manor Marussia - have been confirmed for 2015 by the FIA. Caterham are not on the final entry list.
^Yep....http://ow.ly/2VsPAK
Who's people money on for the 2nd seat? I'd say Van Der Garde or Frijns...
I think King would be the choice if they had no other drivers lined up.I can't see it being King. His father might be on the board, but the investors seem both serious and intent on doing this properly. I can't help but feel that putting King in the seat would undermine that, especially given the way Max Chilton got a drive.
Probably been answered but can they keep the championship point and the associated cash with it?
I can't see it being King. His father might be on the board, but the investors seem both serious and intent on doing this properly. I can't help but feel that putting King in the seat would undermine that, especially given the way Max Chilton got a drive.
Surely they'll be trying to prep Jordan King? Not much point having a dad who's board chief of an F1 team otherwise, right?
They've passed the crash tests, so it's happening guys 👍
Yea I tend to think the same @psychoazubi Looks like they will make it to Melbourne, but with the competition appearing to be even faster this year that 107% is going to be a massive challenge for them, I would like to be positive for them but honestly don't think they'll be fast enough.
Only 4 of 14 107% failures have been barred from racing since the rule was reintroduced... although they were all at Melbourne.
Unless they prove themselves to be fast enough in practise sessions, I don't expect them to be allowed to race if they miss the 107%. It may be the same chassis and a new engine, but the team has gone through a lot of turmoil. It's one thing to have a car that's theoretically capable of setting a lap time, it's another to actually do it.
That's a good point... practice times are taken into account when the inevitable appeal is heard. That said, HRT's failures-to-qualify were due to the low number of laps they ran (arguably never setting a "fast" lap) and occurred in the faster "last-gen" era when the differential between fast/slow teams was of a much greater order, I think that Manor actually have a good chance of qualifying on speed alone.
We may have to disagree on the likely outcome of an appeal if that's not the case
That doesn't affect Manor until they introduce their new car, they're starting the season with Ferrari's 2014 engine. 107% will be a tough challenge for them.I still believe they will struggle to get on the grid based on pace, sure the Ferrari engine looks alot stronger,