Thanks, 2078TM, for the Viper numbers! It really would be best though to use a brand new GT One, not only because of possible horsepower loss but also because of chassis wear and tear (chassis refresh). I have no idea if chassis wear is a factor on Test Course but I wouldn't be surprised if it is, and it's certainly a factor elsewhere, like the Sarthe.
Here are the numbers for the GT One right off the showroom floor.
Horsepower on the Parts Change/Settings screen: 776
Tire type: R3/R3
Brake Controller: 3/3
Suspension defaults:
Spring rate: 14.8/14.8
Ride height: 80/80
Shock (bound): 8/8
Shock (rebound): 8/8
Camber angle: 2.0/1.0
Toe angle: 0/0
Stabilizers: 6/6
Transmission defaults:
1st: 3.244
2nd: 2.071
3rd: 1.465
4th: 1.090
5th: 0.854
6th: 0.705
Final: 3.769
Auto 17
Driving aids (ASM/TCS): 10/10/7
Downforce:
Front 63 (max)
Rear 88 (max)
LSD: 10/40/20
Weight: 0/0
To clear up a possible minor misunderstanding on the B-spec results, the 0 point driver's lap times were identical, lap for lap, with the 10000 pt driver's; he did not run off a string of times each identical to his own previous lap.
Dark Elite, I'd agree we should use a consistent driving line, and keeping the left wheels on the line sounds good to me.
Another note on driving style: Pedal to the metal from start of countdown to finish, full throttle launch. Admittedly this is not the fastest way but it is the most consistent and repeatable way, since it removes a driving variable.
We probably should go to stage 4 turbos but I'd like to hold off and see a PAL result with what we have first. When we do go to turbos, should we also change oil? The turbo can be unequipped if that's where further testing leads, but undoing an oil change costs 4.5 million.
As for 0-1000m tests, I agree with DE. If there turns out to be a difference between NTSC and PAL, then maybe we would want to try 1000m tests if we want to try and pin down just where the difference is.