Actually, I thought they ripped off the 612 Scaglietti, or, even better, the 575M Maranello with the front end (not to mention the 550 Maranello and Mazda RX-7 it was already ripping off with the C5). I never understood why people say it looked like a Viper.LeadSlead#2
Because everyone knows that just because a car can smoke a Lambo Gallardo it's not a supercar (also, I wouldn't exactly call a Gallardo a supercar anyways, it's really just a hopped up Audi. A 15 year old Corvette ZR-1 is more "super" than a Gallardo.) because it is cheap.Young_Warrior
In al honesty, the Ford GT is actually faster than the Saleen S7 (most definately not the twin-turbo, but faster than the old 550 BHP one) in top speed. I don't think the Sagaris can hit 220, but I believe all of the Koigniseggs can, as can every other car mentioned but the Vette, Viper and possibly the SLR.LeadSlead#2
The people who told me how many pounds of downforce the Saleen has at 100 MPH that the torquier and lower to the ground Ford GT does not have. I also believe that the SLR is supposedly capable of 220 if the track is long enough, as is the Ford GT. You may be right about the Zonda (unless it's the Zonda F), and the GT2 I believe is track limited as well.LeadSlead#2
live4speed
Elegy
svtsnake
iceburns288
Elegy
Wait, so after clearly explain why the Ultima is imo not firstly a supercar, you suddenly choose to ignor that explanation and say well if I think the Ultima isn't then thoes arn't either. Yes, the Sagaris and Z06 ARE supercars, the Ultima is too, but firstly it's a track day car, so thats the category it goes into. Like I said, it IS technically a supercar, but it's focus is on a single thing, and thats track performance, the Sagaris and Z06 have compromises to make them road usable, hence, they arn't track day cars, you can have a Limo, thats a supercar, cars can fit into more than one category, like the Ultima does. But it's main focus is track performance, they didn't bat an eyelid about road usage, so it's firstly a track day car.Young_Warrior
And you lack knowledge on the Veyron, it has over 1000bhp regardless of what setting you have it in. For track use you'd have it in handlin mode with the full downforce settings, and the tyres were built to sustain the car doing 250+mph, taking corners isn't a problem for them. The car handles well, as for the Veyron round the ring, I would think the advantage to the Veyron would be even greater at the ring than a track like the TopGear track since most of the ring is high speed. It should hammer the CGT, as for the Enzo, you'd do that much damage to the Enzo going round the ring no-one will run it there. You'd rip the front off and the underbody aerodynamics would get screwed in no time. Don't even try to say thats not true becuase the Enzo was taken to th ring, and they didn't lap it for thoes very reasons. Round the Ring the Veyron would go a hell of a lot faster than a CGT.Young_Warrior
And there we have the definition of a suoercar. Once again Young_Warrior, it's good that you can explain your opinion in so much depth, but thats all it is, your opinion. Try looking up the actual definitions of what super means in the context of supercar, it doesn't mean the best in the world, it means above average/more than average ect and it's not limited to performance either. Just because the Enzo is faster than a lot of other above average cars doesn't stop thoes other cars being supercars.ultrabeat
If you r replying to me, I already know the S7 does 220mph, which is why I said the twin turbo one surely can go over 220mph. It's aerodynamics probably won't allow it to hit 240 or more though. It produces too much drag. And your spot on about the Veyron, even with the added downfoce it can still hit 200mph faster than anything else stock.LeadSlead#2
