That's the answer right there.... bring back the VT's and VX's hahaWhen Holden were dominating they did try to make a change, but it wasn't enough and the Holdens were still faster. That was the VT/VX days.
That's the answer right there.... bring back the VT's and VX's haha
To the Ford fans:
When Holden were dominating they did try to make a change, but it wasn't enough and the Holdens were still faster. That was the VT/VX days. Don't even think about using Holden's 7-in-a-row Bathurst wins as an example either, as the majority of those years a Ford very comfortably won the championship. I do think there are parity issues, and I think it involves aerodynamics. To say the Holden teams aren't as professional is rediculous when you still have teams like HRT, GRM and Jim Richards involved with Jack Daniel's still (I think). To say those guys, who have been in the game for decades now are un-professional is quite ludicrous.
I would be very very surprised if a Holden wins a single race this year unless a change is made.
I'm not saying the top Holden teams are unprofessional, they're doing very, very well but it seems to me that teams like FPR, 888 and DJR are doing things better at the moment. Perhaps "professional" wasn't the word I was looking for a few posts ago.
I wouldn't be surprised if a Holden could win. Will Davison has been very strong, surprisingly stronger than Tander and I think he could quite possibly get his second race win early in the season.
Oh yeah Ford is doing better, putting less money in and getting great results, they should remove some more money!
That's the answer right there.... bring back the VT's and VX's haha
The AU Falcons weren't so special either though..... Ambrose at Canberra 2002 car couldn't even hold it's wheels on haha
What he hell was that!? Perkins should KNOW that if you're a lap down, you don't race for position! Sure, he might have been on the better tyre, but he was at risk of wiping the race leaders out with that dumb-arsed move.
No, that's not it at all. I suspect that Perkns would ahve done the same even if he were on the control. He migh be the Son of Larry, but that doesn't mean he's the brightest spark out there.My point again, having these faster tyres makes the drivers think they have right of way.
Sure. If you want racs to be a procession. Shouldn't the likes of Slade, Reynolds and Marshall deserve a chance to prove themselves? For all we know, they could be the Next Big Thing in the sport, and the option tyre keeps the racing close. Or would you prefer if they were circulating at the back in order of speed?One tyre fits all thanks.
No, that's not it at all. I suspect that Perkns would ahve done the same even if he were on the control. He migh be the Son of Larry, but that doesn't mean he's the brightest spark out there.
Sure. If you want racs to be a procession. Shouldn't the likes of Slade, Reynolds and Marshall deserve a chance to prove themselves? For all we know, they could be the Next Big Thing in the sport, and the option tyre keeps the racing close. Or would you prefer if they were circulating at the back in order of speed?
And how does having one single tyre help things at all. Jamie Whincup won the first four races without anyone getting near him; surely you don't want the sport to be like that. It happened with mark Skaife and it got boring. It happened in Formula One with Michael Schumacher, and it got boring, too. Having a control tyre does nothing whereas having the option not only allows the little guys to come to the fore, it also makes the top drivers work a little bit harder for race wins.Err, if they're constantly circulating at the back and never improve then they're not the next big thing. How does giving them faster tyres help at all?
I'd say it's far more likely Coulthard was in Tander's blind spot so Tander never saw him and Coulthard had nowere to go because he was committed to the corner. Coulthard was actually pretty impressive racing for the Paul Cruickshank outfit last year. But you wouldn't have noticed because he was down the back. If you're looking for a driver who is more likely to punt into another one, look at Garth Tander and the way he usually seems to bear a few battle scars by the end of the race. You can't tell me his bent bonnet was someone else's fault.Additionally, it was the sprint tyre that also made Coultard think he could just push Tander out of the way in race 1 simply because he was on the faster tyre.
Which either means you've got nothing to respond with, or I was right about you only being happy when a Holden is out front. Maybe both.
All I did was state that I think the option tyre is a good thing because it has already shown that it allows for closer racing. Just because this conflicts with your opinion that option tyres are a bad thing - for reasons you never really did define - does not mean I know nothing about it. Presenting your opinions as fact is never a good way to endear yourself to someone or to give your argument credibility. I admit, I deliberately posted stuff bashing Holden because it's obvious you're a Holden man. I did it because I wanted to see which way you'd jump. And you didn't do very well.No, it means your post is so stupidly off course, I don't have to continue the conversation because you've already proven how little you know and how incorrectly you think.
And in case you missed it, I was baiting you when I suggested - but never specifically stated - that you were only happy when a Holden was out the front. Your aggressive reaction followed by a hyper-defensive response suggest that you are.
...Just a thought. I don't know what the ruling is on these new tyres, but how come no one thought of putting the new tyres on the front and control tyres on the back? Ok you wouldn't get the drive but cornering would be fantastic
OK, Tassie Event this weekend.
First lap always produces some action, especially turn 2, turn 4 (hairpin) and turn 7 (end of the back straight). Tyres will play another part.
GO the Blue Oval
I also remember (I think jason akermanis) Rolling his Mini Challenge on the warm up lap last year.