What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,477 comments
  • 661,997 views
Bronson - starring Tom Hardy. Loved it! It gives me confidence in his upcoming role as Bane.

HP 7.2 - I liked it.

Pirate Radio - Very funny! Highly recommend it.
 
Friday night, was a night for sushi and Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows Part 2. It was awesome 👍

Big hug.

Eager Snake.
 
Friday night, was a night for sushi and Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows Part 2. It was awesome 👍

Big hug.

Eager Snake.

Rotten Tomatoes rated it 100%. Never thought the site would give a perfect critic score for any of the Harry Potter films. Must have been the best of the series.
 
The Lincoln Lawyer - it's exactly what it looks like it is. Cheesy and predictable. All the actors are shot in favorable lighting so they all look beautiful. I wouldn't recommend it unless the trailer seems remotely interesting. You'll get more out of an episode of CSI (and I don't even like that show). I noticed early on the cheesy Blue/Orange contrasting in all the shots so I spent most of my time critiquing the work of the DP instead of focusing on the shallow plot.
 
Just saw Captain America: The First Avenger.

Way better than Thor was (which felt rushed to me).

👍
 


Il Gattopardo (a.k.a. The Leopard) (Luchino Visconti, 1963) -- The final throes of the dying aristocracy in Sicily during the 1860s, traced in a slow rhythm following Fabrizio Corbero, the Prince of Salina (played by Burt Lancaster) and his rise to eminence of the ex-peasant Don Calogero. It's about the way aristocracy usually will enjoy being at the top of the social foodchani, yet will do little to ensure no one else rises or to maintain itself there, because they tend to think no one will be able to reach them. It's a true story of the degeneration of aristocracy that refuses to take steps to make Italy one unified country thinking it will do no good for Sicily to be part of it. A brave movie, very exposing of the different views of the church and government and a surefire treasure to be watched, even with a 187-minute clocktime. 8/10
 
Rotten Tomatoes rated it 100%. Never thought the site would give a perfect critic score for any of the Harry Potter films. Must have been the best of the series.

Not anymore... At 97 or so... Which is still outrageously high.
 


The Onion Movie (Tom Kuntz, Mike Maguire, 2008) -- A series of sketchy satires of American culture shown from the standpoint of the Onion News show, along with the program's commercials, some commentary on the film as it proceeds, and terrorists in training. The movie is basically 90 minutes of tryint to keep you focused and entertained based on pure sarcastic points of view, and honestly it works, but it's not very funny. It really pushes the envelope regarding all stereotypes but doesn't use it as a crutch. There's also the Steven Seagal touch that really makes fun of himself. A definite funny movie that isn't anything better than rental, yet doesn't try to be either. Pure unadultered humor. 5.5/10
 
Paul - Great movie and I loved the ET/X-files tribute at the end, but I it starred Seth Rogen, so automatic point reduction for that and half a point reduction for Segorny Weaver in an alien movie...so 3.5/4

Fast Five - a Fast and Furious movie with a descent plot and story. Surprisingly, the worst part about this movie is Dwayne Johnson. I don't even know why he was in the movie. Seriously. His character didn't really contribute anything to the movie...and his last line is completely redundant. I just love how the big, tough, hard ass, ex-military guy gets all teary eyed and emotional when his team dies. Kinda ironic when they spent the WHOLE MOVIE trying to convince you that he didn't care about anyone but himself. And then, at the end of the movie, he goes right back to his old, hard-ass self. WTF? Dwayne was actually akin to Jar Jar Binks in Fast Five. Anyways, a 3/5 for putting a useless character in there and pretending like he actually matters.
 
you might want to throw in some spoiler tags before pointing out the movie's plot details
 
you might want to throw in some spoiler tags before pointing out the movie's plot details

Considering that Dwayne's and his team weren't really part of the main storyline nor did they really contribute anything, I don't feel like I revealed any important details about the plot.

It was essentially Oceans 11 with cars and Jar Jar Binks.

But...what is up with Dwayne Johnson? His first three movies were pretty good, and recently, all his roles have been crap. I mean, the guy can act, but...he's got to learn to pick better roles. Ironically, his crappy roles seemed all begin with Doom.
 
Oh, don't need to be so harsh on the guy, Tomas, no serious spoilers there, just a somewhat negative review with some general plot notes.

Also, I'm definitely going to watch Il Gattopardo. With my Spanish background, first thing I thought was Gato Pardo... Leopard? and yes! But I love in either movie or book format semi-historical accounts from the 1800's, whether Russia, Britain, the US, South America, Japan, or any other part of the world, so thanks for bringing it to my attention!
 
Le Mans- Was there even a story? Apart from some good race footage it's rather lacking for a non-documentary film.
 
Also, I'm definitely going to watch Il Gattopardo. With my Spanish background, first thing I thought was Gato Pardo... Leopard? and yes! But I love in either movie or book format semi-historical accounts from the 1800's, whether Russia, Britain, the US, South America, Japan, or any other part of the world, so thanks for bringing it to my attention!

Arm yourself with copious amounts of caffeine ;)
 
196524.jpg


No, wait. That's not right.


Captain-America-2011-Movie-Poster-1-590x800.jpg


That's better.

Captain America: The First Avenger (9.5/10)

Go...see...this...film. This is the ultimate way a comic book movie should be done. It takes itself seriously without having to be dark and brooding. It is just a good guy that wants to do what is right. Every other hero has a motive for being a hero, some background that leads them to their destiny. This guy was just born to be a hero. No one thrusts him into the situation, in fact he has to overcome great odds to be given the chance. So, you have the fun hero adventure without the Tony Stark kind of boyish immaturity and you have a hero who wishes to stop evil without the Bruce Wayne traumatic background to make him feel that way.

Also, if you are looking at Chris Evans, of Fantastic Four fame, and saying you just can't see it happening, check that at the door. I watched the entire film without having a single thought about The Human Torch, well except for a very brief cameo from the original Human Torch that only die hard Marvel fan boys will catch.

And that is what made this incredible, that attention to detail. The original Human Torch seen in a scene, and then even though you are watching a WWII period piece you will see things that you will recognize from Iron Man 2 and Thor. In fact, the villain's entire plot is based on a mythical legend that anyone who is aware that the Thor movie exists in the same universe can accept.

And for the villain (If you don't know who the villain is, then spoiler alert I guess): Hugo Weaving is not Toby McGuire, James Franco, Willem DaFoe, or Topher Grace. He doesn't need his face to be shown on camera every 15 minutes. Part of what makes a villain work is the knowledge that they posses a psychosis which makes them identify themselves as their villainous alter-ego. If the actor constantly wants face time and is talking and acting like their secret identity you lose some of that fear. Once you see Red Skull Hugo Weaving's face is never seen again. For me, that was the most contrasted difference between Jack Nicholson and Heath Ledger's Jokers. They had to write the script in a way that allowed Jack Nicholson to show his regular face most of the time.



But to sum it all up. See this film. If you like action movies go see this. If you like Marvel comics then go see this.
 
Is that The Boat that Rocked?

I hated it. 3/10

From your link:
This movie could be good or could be bad, depending on what you're looking for. If you're expecting a fun movie with a huge variety of music, about some really odd characters pursuing freedom of speech and acting fairly well, and some really nice imagery from the 60s, you won't be disappointed. If, on the other hand, you're looking for a thought-out movie with deep plot development, historical accuracy and consistency, look elsewhere.

I rented this movie for the funnies and I loved it. You must've been in the latter group hoping for something serious.
 
What the... There is no way captain America is a 9.5 movie. That's like same level as the god farther
 
What the... There is no way captain America is a 9.5 movie. That's like same level as the god farther
Different kinds of movies, different kinds of scales. A comedy doesn't get good reviews because it is as good as an Oscar winner, but because it is a good comedy.

I can not imagine a better Captain America movie. If I had a checklist of everything this film needs to do to be good it hit them all. The number of things I found that could have been improved on I can count on one hand. And only one or two were things I noticed as I was watching the film.
 
Haven't seen it but given that review I think it could be broken out as follows:

If you are a comic book fanatic: 9.5/10 stars
If you are average joe: 7/10 stars
If you are a film snob: 5/10 stars

I've seen the preview and it looks like a decent action flick. Transformers 3 was a decent action flick too...but no way I'd rate it up there with "The Kings Speech", "The Hurt Locker", or "Slumdog Millionaire".

I can not imagine a better Captain America movie

In the genre of Captain America films...I'm sure it gets a 9.5/10.

But how would you rate it in the genre of Comic book films, comparing it to the likes of the entire Batman series, Dick Tracey, X-Men, etc... I've seen some online lists that put the latest Batman at the top, but I think Heath Ledger's death skewed those polls. In 5 years the Tim Burton Batmans will be placed above it for re-inventing the character and the genre as a whole.

Then furthermore, how would you rate it in the genre of action films?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haven't seen it but given that review I think it could be broken out as follows:

If you are a comic book fanatic: 9.5/10 stars
If you are average joe: 7/10 stars
If you are a film snob: 5/10 stars

I've seen the preview and it looks like a decent action flick. Transformers 3 was a decent action flick too...but no way I'd rate it up there with "The Kings Speech", "The Hurt Locker", or "Slumdog Millionaire".
Ask any fan of Transformers and they will think I am a film snob. Also, there is almost no comparison between Transformers 3 and Captain America. If this were food Captain America would be your favorite dessert or treat. It's not healthy for you but you love it and it has been perfectly prepared. Transformers 3 is an improperly prepared dessert. Its sweet and unhealthy and has all the same stuff as your favorite treat, but it wasn't mixed properly, had the wrong amount of ingredients, and it wasn't cooked long enough or at the right temperature, so it may make you sick.

It should also be noted that I don't give a gorram what the average joe or film snob think. I didn't have to turn off my brain to enjoy it and Citizen Kane would have made a crappy action flick. The only way people can't see this as an incredibly good film is if you aren't one who would find the source material to be an incredibly good story either. You should also note that I did use one example to point out how this film succeeds over technical issues common among the current popular comic book films.

And I think that if you all took a look at some of the supporting actors you would see that talent was brought in on this film. Tommy Lee Jones steals every scene he is in. Stanley Tucci did an amazing job, and the casting director made a brilliant decision by taking Band of Brothers alum, Neal McDonough, and making him Dum Dum Dugan.

In the genre of Captain America films...I'm sure it gets a 9.5/10.

But how would you rate it in the genre of Comic book films, comparing it to the likes of the entire Batman series, Dick Tracey, X-Men, etc... I've seen some online lists that put the latest Batman at the top, but I think Heath Ledger's death skewed those polls. In 5 years the Tim Burton Batmans will be placed above it for re-inventing the character and the genre as a whole.

Then furthermore, how would you rate it in the genre of action films?
Keep in mind, I prefer the Iron Man films over the Batman films. The Batman films are technically good films, but they take everything out of the comic aspect. It has been the secret of Nolan's success (Technically Frank Miller), stripping the comic from a comic book story. The same can be said for Allan Moore (and Zack Snyder) with Watchmen, but then that was the point of Watchmen. The Marvel movies on the other hand are taking a comic book story and translating it as directly as possible to film. Tony Stark and Bruce Wayne are both brilliant, rich playboys who use their mind and money to become heroes. Batman does it because he is haunted by the ghosts of his parents. Tony Stark does it because, well, its fun. Marvel basically asks if you remember running around in your Superman Underoos with a blanket on your shoulders thinking how awesome it would be to be a superhero, then they say, "So do we." And that is what you get. WB is asking if we know what it is like to be so angry at the world that we like to wear black and speak in gravelly tones while beating up all the bullies that represent those who killed his parents.

To me, the recent Batman films are in a comic sub-genre with films like Watchmen, 300, Sin City, Darkman, etc. I almost don't like to make the comparisons because they are so very different that the subjectivity is based on style preference.

But this has probably become my favorite comic film. It also has the benefit of adding the WWII drama to it. And when you compare the characters' motivations; Tony Stark is just having a bit too much fun, Bruce Wayne really needs a therapist, but Captain America just doesn't like bullies. You can't not like this guy.

As for action films, it is definitely the best one this year. Not only is the action well done, but it doesn't leave me shaking my head at the story.


And now I cannot wait for The Avengers. Purely to watch Tony Stark and Steven Rogers face each other down. Tony stark can't keep his mouth shut and Steven Rogers won't silently stand by while someone like that crosses the line.
 
films are rated against each other no matter what genre. Which is why Batman got rated so high because it was an amazing film and action comic movie. So it's possible to make all the others amazing too. I haven't seen captain america yet so maybe it is 9.5 overall I just doubt its same level.
 
I think your response further confirms your comic book snobbery. If I were eating comic books, it sounds like this movie would be the perfect dessert.

However if I were eating movie scripts, it is probably more like one of those pigs in a blanket that the waiters serve at wedding cocktail hours. They are good if you happen to grab one as the waiter goes by...but you're not going to chase him around the room to get another one...and if you miss it completely...well, dinner will be served soon.

The Iron Man movies were good (6/10 on a cross-genre scale). The first two X-Men movies are also flicks that I'd watch on TV again (first one gets an 7/10). They introduce me to the characters without requiring any previous knowledge from hundreds of comics. I'm sure I'd get more out of them had I read the comics, but it wasn't necessary. I enjoyed Sin City too...but it's clearly not a movie for everyone.

It sounds like Captain America fits right in with those movies...and is possibly better. I'll wait for it to come out on Netflix and add it to my queue. I'll stick to my guns about it not being a 9.5/10 though.

It should also be noted that I don't give a gorram what the average joe or film snob think
Which is why you wouldn't make a good movie critic. I watch a lot of movies...good ones and bad ones. I always try to give two ratings...one that is my own based on my personal preferences, and one that I think would be more general acceptance. So I think you really like this comic book genre and have rated it high within that genre...but in the scope of film in general, it is probably rated much lower.
 
films are rated against each other no matter what genre.
But then you break them up for all but one award. Why? Because they don't really compare. How would one compare The King's Speech to Captain America? Steve Rogers stammers when he talks to women and World War II, that's it. Better yet, would you recommend any comic book movie to someone who would prefer to watch movies like The King's Speech or The Hurt Locker (Keep in mind The Avengers has Hurt Locker's Jeremy Renner)? Or better yet, would you recommend a comic book movie to a fan of films like My Big Fat Greek Wedding and Ya Ya Sisterhood?

Then there is also the what I like vs what is technically better. I like the Marvel style films better than the Batman films. I have lost count of the number of times I have watched the Iron Man films and The Incredible Hulk, but I have watched the Nolan Batman films maybe twice each since buying the blu-rays. I am not, nor do I pretend to be, a professional film critic. If I look at Rotten Tomatoes reviews for Captain America I sound more like the 85% positive audience reviews than the 74% positive critics reviews.

I just doubt its same level.
After talking to some people that saw it I find that what people get out of it is what they take in. A co-worker complained that it was too much Steve Rogers and not enough Captain America. To me, that is someone that missed the point of the character. It is someone that wants Bruce Wayne vs Batman, alter egos in their comic book characters. But Captain America was always just Captain Steve Rogers, soldier. Some people feel that the fact that he isn't learning a lesson or going through some sort of change to become a hero makes for very little character development, but to me that is what makes Captain America a great hero.

But as I said earlier, whether or not you like Captain America will likely hinge on whether or not you like the character in any other medium as well.

I should also point out that Captain America's director is Joe Johnston, who also did The Rocketeer and October Sky. So, it isn't as if no talent came to the table here.

EDIT: When did this become the "I never saw it but think your review is wrong" review reviewing thread? Jesus Christ, I like the movie A LOT. But pretty girls and explosions aren't enough to get my attention, I think the entire Transformers trilogy seriously lacks in nearly every area. Even the action is hampered by shaky cam. As individual films they are brain-off popcorn fun at best. As a trilogy it is a jumbled plot-hole confused, tangle of nonsensical story. Captain America makes none of the mistakes Transformers does, and is, in my opinion, more fun than a depressed sociopath in a bat suit.

I think your response further confirms your comic book snobbery. If I were eating comic books, it sounds like this movie would be the perfect dessert.

However if I were eating movie scripts, it is probably more like one of those pigs in a blanket that the waiters serve at wedding cocktail hours. They are good if you happen to grab one as the waiter goes by...but you're not going to chase him around the room to get another one...and if you miss it completely...well, dinner will be served soon.
1) You do realize in my comparison The Kings Speech would be like filet mignon, right? By your pigs in a blanket standard then Transformers is a dog turd that turned old and looks like a powdered donut in comparison.

Which is why you wouldn't make a good movie critic.
Never claimed to be.

I watch a lot of movies...good ones and bad ones. I always try to give two ratings...one that is my own based on my personal preferences, and one that I think would be more general acceptance. So I think you really like this comic book genre and have rated it high within that genre...but in the scope of film in general, it is probably rated much lower.
Hmm, if I did that it would be Cabin Boy: 10/10 vs 1/10. But in real life I say it was so bad it is awesome, 10/10.

I would like to point you back to my closing line:

Me
But to sum it all up. See this film. If you like action movies go see this. If you like Marvel comics then go see this.
I am unsure at which point that makes it unclear as to how I am reviewing the film.
 
Last edited:
Whoa.
 
I never said Transformers 3 was a good film...I just said it was decent in the scope of action films. You are correct though, it has all the right ingrediants...just not the right mix...but it fails for other reasons too...

a) They removed "side" from the title probably to avoid copyright issues but did not remove references to Pink Floyd from the actual movie. There are any number of names they could have given the movie that would have given it more curb appeal than removing one word from the title we all know they wanted to use.
b) They fictionalized and crapped on several great moments in U.S. history to insert their story line.
c) Some may still consider falling skyscrapers a taboo subject after 9/11 but Michael Bay has no problems animating robotic worms to tear down skyscrapers while characters nearly fall to their death. If only Optimus Prime was there to save us back in 2001...gag!

I'd give Transformers a cross-genre rating of about 3/10 stars. For action movies...comparing it to the likes recent titles like "Live Free or Die Hard" or "The A-Team"...it pretty much is on par with a 7/10. You get hot chicks, cool explosions, talking robots, and the possibility of enslaving the human race and destroying all of Earth's natural resources. What else does an action film need?

Hold on, don't answer that...I guess it needs a race of blue people and a running time of over 2.5 hours to be considered for an Acadamy award. PS, I refuse to watch Avatar.
 
Back