Don't forget Hamilton vs Kobo...
Can I also remind you Ardius that you mentioned during the build up that there was only 1 place to overtake on this course - Casio...
Only 1 overtake there I think! (Schumi vs Rubens)
The rest were on the Hairpin or on the straight...
Also to add - Rosberg would've (probably) beaten Schumacher if his wheel hadn't fallen off?!
And out of curiousity - who mentioned that Kubica showed that the renault was a superior piece of machinery in the race? He only made turn 3 competitively... yes he had a good start - but Petrov had a better start had he not driven into Hulk he would've taken about 4 places... Kubica only managed 1.
C.
Well, I also said that overtaking at the hairpin was too risky and seeing as no one except for Kobayashi ever tried it, I don't think I said anything wrong. Go look back through the races over the years, you won't find many overtakes at the hairpin, hence why Kobayashi's race was bloody amazing - his overtakes required the drivers ahead to realise he was there and leave the room. He was lucky that all of them noticed in time, as they were almost all divebomb overtakes.
Schumacher had faster pace than Rosberg all race. Even if he hadn't overtaken him, I wouldn't consider it a "victory" on Rosberg's part. I would still commend Schumacher on finally finding some good pace.
I don't really see the comparison between Kubica and Petrov....one is starting behind Red Bulls, one is starting behind Saubers, Williams and Force Indias. Which is easier? People aren't referring to the race when they refer to Kubica showing what the car can do - they are referring to the qualifying and all the races previous!
Renault have been getting good starts all year, its not surprising Petrov got a good start. He also benefitted from a slow Rosberg off the line (backed the pack behind him up). Whereas Kubica only benefitted from a slow Alonso (Kubica started alongside him, so it didn't benefit his start as much compared to Petrov's).
Thing is with Petrov, he's in a team with a very good #1 driver who is, I think, world champion material in the right car. That said, he clearly makes some glaring errors (more than most rookies I think) and is just so inconsistent. If he were consistent, even at a rather average level, some way behind his team mate, I'd have more trust in him. He's not had that many good results this season (5th at Hungary, helped somewhat by Hamilton and Kubica DNFs, and 7th at China just about fits in as a good result) and is quite often fighting for the wrong Q session.
His mid-season was terrible, 6 consecutive races without finishing higher than 11th and none of them were DNF's.
He is most certainly not in the right team, Kubica will make most Rookies look quite bad. He deserves another chance, even if I don't think he has the talent of some of the rookies he used to race against in GP2. But where? Virgin?
Ok, I don't think anyone is going to bother looking this up, so I'll just cut to the chase:
Petrov's experience consists of:
2 years of Ladas.
3 years of various Formula Renault races/more Ladas.
4 years of GP2.
Its amazing he even got to the front on pace in GP2 with so little experience (compared to the average driver). I think he deserves a little longer than your average rookie (which by the way, takes more than 1 year to really get to grips anyway). He has shown promise at times, at least as much as Buemi and Alguersuari have and no one is saying they should give up their seats?
It seems the standard for rookies has been raised to incredibly high heights. Its rare for drivers to be like Kobayashi and Hamilton, quick straight out of the box.