Tired Tyres
Premium
- 12,901

- West Yorkshire
- Tired_Tyres
- Tired Tyres
He made a passing move on the inside. How do you do that without forcing the other guy to go wide? It's still Massa's choice to back out of it or try and stay with him.
He made a passing move on the inside. How do you do that without forcing the other guy to go wide? It's still Massa's choice to back out of it or try and stay with him.
I agree on that, shame about the red flag incident happening which also involved Hamilton with someone driving into the back of him.Which would have made a bizarre bookend with what happened later at Indy.
Make your own mind up from this footage:Didn't Hamilton force him to the outside? I only got a quick look at the replay when they showed it on SPEED.
Massa was ahead coming out of the corner, Hamilton moved inside and Massa couldn't turn for the kink in the tunnel. He couldn't back off, he would have had to brake to avoid that accident. It's ironic, he actually could have turned in on Hamilton because he had nothing to lose at that point, then Hamilton's comments after the race would have had merit. There was nothing wrong with Hamilton's overtake in the tunnel, but Massa couldn't have avoided the collision either. That tunnel can't realistically accomodate two cars side by side.
I only meant what happened in the tunnel. That was a clean move by Hamilton. Massa could have backed out of it but didn't and crashed.*
* On further review of the above video, Massa couldn't have backed out of that. He didn't take the racing line in to the tunnel either. What was that about?
Felipe MassaThen when I got to the tunnel my car was damaged and I went on the dirty part of the track and hit the wall.
This could be the next caption photo:
![]()
This could be the next caption photo:
![]()
Did you not see Hamilton crashing into Massa in the hairpin or Hamilton pushing Massa to the wall in the tunnel?Massa tried to pin blame on Hamilton for his crash in the tunnel. Spoken like a guy who hasn't gotten over 2008 yet, and is just frustrated over his terrible season thus far.
I know Ferrari has said kept up formalities regarding keeping Massa on, but I'd be stunned if Ferrari kept Massa on after this year. He's just been atrocious.
Do you expect the drivers to lay down and give away their position on track?I can understand Lewis's frustrations, he had two drivers give him no room and then two drivers drive into the back of his car, maybe that is why he thought the drivers were ridiculous at the time of the interview. Click here to read his comments after going to the stewards to "make peace".
MÜLE_9242;5373416So let me get this straight...
People complain that the drivers are told what to say and are not allowed to show any character, yet when someone actually does, they're a baby and/or a spoiled brat?
What if the roles were reversed and it was your hero Ferrari driver who collided in a racing incident with Hamilton. Would he have been given a penalty? If he did, and went on a similar tirade, would he be a baby?
Do you expect the drivers to lay down and give away their position on track?
No I don't. However I expect the driver in front to give some room which Schumacher, Rosberg Petrov and Hamilton clearly demonstrated and I'm sure a few others. Let me put it this way, if Hamilton never got past but Maldonado gave space, people will say good attempt, Hamilton showing he is a true racer. If he gets past, Hamilton is an excellent overtaker, no space he is an idiot for being there and attempting to overtake and gets a drive through penalty for causing a collision. You could see Hamilton turning to cut the corner / avoid Maldonado before Maldonado completely turns in, but it is understandable from Maldonado's point of view as he didn't look in his mirrors unlike Schumacher who did and gave Hamilton room.
Brundle said the overtake on Schumacher was excellent by Lewis, something similar anyway. However had Schumacher turned in completely, everyone would probably be saying Lewis is the idiot for being there and destroying his race early on and pointing to it being similar to Monza last year. Fine margins of passing but it all depends on if the driver in front gives some room. Maybe it was a bit naive for Hamilton to expect a rookie to have the capacity to look in his mirrors while also spotting a braking point but he should have known something was coming as Lewis was over the back of him on the exit going left to right and it was the DRS zone.
So Alonso finally seems to have gotten his starts down. Hopefully he continues like this and mixes the races up a bit.
Didn't Kobayashi do the same thing over and over last year at the Suzuka hairpin? (something so many praised).
This is more to do with "diving" overtakes in the first place. But I think you'll find some people (myself included) are a little cautious of praising overtakes like that on Schumacher as we normally add on "but he was lucky he saw him coming".
Which I think you'll find Brundle said that too, admitting that while it was a good overtake...it really relied on Schumacher moving over because once Lewis had committed to the move, Schumacher had no choice but to move out of the way.
This I reckon is what the stewards are really penalising him for, making do-or-die overtakes which demand drivers move out of the way. Its not a fair way of conducting your racing and I think you'll find most drivers don't appreciate it. Why? The reason is Maldanado's crash.
Speaking of the Pastor incident, what was the verdict from the Stewards?
You must be very cautious on praising Kobayashi's overtaking moves then, I'm a fan of his too but even his overtake on Sutil today was a dive down the inside and was not as in control as Hamilton was. He only got a reprimand today though.
I think Brundle said something Schumacher being wise about seeing Hamilton being there and then giving him some space.
His moves did not demand Maldonado or Massa to move out the way, just relied on them giving minimal room for them to both make the corner but he got completely shut off on both attempts. Maldonado's crash was simply because he was not looking in the mirror and did not see Lewis was near him but drivers should be aware in a DRS zone about someone possibly attempting to overtake even if it is opportunistic but it was very similar to the Schumacher one. Lewis got an advantage from making the opportunistic move as he gained Maldonado's place without losing any in the end so his risk paid off in the end as it could be crucial points required to keep him in the title race.
Most drivers don't appreciate it as it puts them in a difficult position to get past and lose position. The reason why the stewards penalised him was him being the car behind and if he stays behind, there would have been no collision and would have all been avoidable. However if Maldonado or Massa gave him slight room, both incidents he would have got no penalty I believe so shows how much the driver in front has got in terms of power. I remember Singapore last year about the clash with Lewis and Mark, had Lewis been the leading car and Webber was attempting a pass, Mark would have been penalised but it went down as a racing incident as Lewis was not fully ahead of Webber before turning in and claiming the position entirely.
On a side not, I have noticed you spell ridiculous wrong on many occasions. Not a personal attack or anything I thought you would like to know as I always find the incorrect spelling of ridiculous funny as usually in context it is about someone complaining about something. It might help you out in future.
I was cheering LH to be the one to take on SV, but now as much as I dont like SV, out of those two, he gets my vote.
On the Schumi over take, I’d say it was a 50/50 move and both drivers did a good job up until LH gestured at Schumi. Get over yourself LH. It is also unnotice so far that LH was on the radio whining that Schumi touched him in the first corner, but then continued to run roughshod over most ahead of him under the 'I'm innocent' banner 👎
👍
What was it he said...
"Is your front wing ok Lewis?
Yeah it should be ok. Massa turned in on me, that was on purpose"
You drove into the side of him and then ran him wide onto the marbles in the tunnel. I presume that was by accident eh?
I have to admit, I dont quite get what you are saying - you agreeing or disagreeing![]()