2012 Formula One Etihad Airways Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

The F2012 has been noted to have better race pace, but even though Alonso has been very good in making good use of it to gain positions, it still looks like a very uphill battle for Alonso to clinch his third title.

Ferrari and Alonso would really need to throw in their everything together as a whole team for Alonso to be able to nab that title. It's certainly going to be very interesting...
 
Raikkonen isn't so much mentally strong as utterly relaxed. It's hard to really judge his personality but there's an element of him thinking merely "meh" when another car is breathing down his neck.


He comes off that way at times (it's Kimi), but I think he clearly showed this race weekend that his emotions do get wound up. It was great to see him hold on for the victory, and I felt like his drive was intense, especially going down to the last lap.
 
If it were as simple as just having a fast car only to win, then tell me why Webber and the Mclaren drivers aren't doing as well?

I can't tell whether that's a direct response to my question, or simply the start of another point.

If it's the former then no part of my response said it was only about having a fast car.

If it's the latter, then in McLaren's case it's reliability. I've no doubt at all that without the myriad cock-ups and breakdowns Hamilton has had all year he'd be right up there with Vettel and Alonso. Bad luck has robbed Hamilton of a couple of wins and a few podiums too*. Even Button may have scored a few more points, though I don't think he'd be competing for the title this year as he just doesn't seem to be as happy with the car.

As for Webber, he's not as quick as Vettel, simple as that. But then Massa isn't as quick as Alonso either, and he's been even further down the grid as a result.

It's pretty simple as far as I can see: Alonso has driven the wheels off the car all season to get where he is. Vettel has done likewise, but he's also had comfortably the better car in the latter part of the season, so has been able to capitalise on it more.

* Of course, bad luck has also claimed Vettel and Alonso on a few occasions each too, but I doubt anyone would say they've had it on the same level as Hamilton.
 
So, 12 points between Mercedes and Sauber for 5th in the WCC. Do we think Sauber can manage it?

Well the way everyone is driving it seems like nobody wants it!

If Schumacher and Rosberg stay on the track they shouldn't have too much trouble getting 5th. But if Perez pulls out a blinder at one of the next couple of tracks and Merc screws up... who knows?
 
Mercedes have been pretty poor pace-wise this 2nd half of the season (barely making top 10 pace and dicing with Toro Rossos) and they're clearly not developing their car much.

Sauber on the other hand have frequently been top 10 on pace but suffer either from poor strategy, mistakes from the drivers or just random poor pace at certain track layouts.

I think Sauber can do it, but it depends on if the car works well at Austin and Interlagos.
 
So, 12 points between Mercedes and Sauber for 5th in the WCC. Do we think Sauber can manage it?

I think so.

The two remaining tracks require good medium and high-speed aero performance and as we know already, Sauber do well at those kind of tracks.
 
Said the man that wants no stone unturned and demands from the whole team what he says Alonso is already giving: 120%. Oh and he also has some nice words for Vettel.

Should Stefano Domenicali be worried? I will 'bold' the relevant parts


Ferrari official site
Maranello, 5 November –
[...]
The Abu Dhabi weekend finished with a positive final balance in terms of the numbers: Fernando Alonso has reduced the gap at the top of the drivers’ championship and the Scuderia has kept the constructors’ championship open while increasing the gap over third-placed McLaren.

It was also a weekend of very unusual events and situations, as President Luca di Montezemolo underlined in a statement for www.ferrari.com following a long meeting with Stefano Domenicali and the Scuderia’s top engineers.

“The weekend was hard to read,” said Montezemolo. “That began with Saturday evening when I watched a situation that was not entirely clear. As far as Ferrari is concerned I want to understand why the new parts that we brought to the track only partially improved the performance of the F2012, which wasn’t enough to allow Alonso to fight for the very front positions on the grid – despite the contrasting expectations of our engineers.

Yesterday Fernando nonetheless produced his umpteenth great race of the season, in which he again gave 120% and he managed to fight for victory right to the end. But it’s clear that we have to do more for the coming races. That is what I requested today of Domenicali and his team: we have 10 crucial days ahead, during which we must do everything to arrive in Texas with a car that can fight for the victory. Words count for nothing: this must be our target

Montezemolo then returned to how yesterday evening’s race went: “To start sixth and finish second, despite only benefiting from one retirement from another car, clearly shows the pedigree of Fernando’s race yet again. Of course, yesterday morning we were all hoping to gain back a few more points in the championship given Vettel’s starting position. Instead he produced a fine race too, even if the two safety car periods certainly didn’t help us...” “Nonetheless I remain confident because everything is possible,” concluded Montezemolo.

“It depends on us: yet again in these last 15 years we are involved in the title battle right up to the end and we have seen how much more difficult situations in the championship standings have been overturned. It’s up to us not to leave any stone unturned: I am certain that the will to win drives the men and women who work for Ferrari and that everyone will work with absolute determination, giving the same 120% that Fernando keeps on giving.

We want to win the World Championship – just as we have done this year in many Gran Turismo title fights thanks to the mighty 458 Italia, beating the most important constructors: I believe in us more than anyone.”

The first Sunday in November was indeed full of success for the Prancing Horse in the GT competitions. In Barcelona the 458 GT added to its extraordinary roll of honour with successes in the International GT Open, in both the GT and the GTS categories for Constructors, Teams and Drivers. Gianmaria Bruni and Federico Leo with the AF Corse team in GT and Daniel Zampieri and Michael Dalle Stelle with Kessel Racing in GTS all produced truly outstanding seasons that allowed Ferrari to prevail over constructors of the calibre of Porsche, Mercedes and McLaren.
 
Hun200kmh
Said the man that wants no stone unturned and demands from the whole team what he says Alonso is already giving: 120%. Oh and he also has some nice words for Vettel.

Should Stefano Domenicali be worried? I will 'bold' the relevant parts

Did the same number of engineers that went into the room come out?
 
:lol: If Italians believed in seppuku, that would have been a bloody meeting.

The Ferrari upgrades were indeed a disappointment. Red Bull and McLaren seem to forever be half-a-second ahead in terms of one-lap pace over the Ferrari. Going to be a long off-season for Ferrari's chassis engineers.
 
Raikkonen isn't so much mentally strong as utterly relaxed. It's hard to really judge his personality but there's an element of him thinking merely "meh" when another car is breathing down his neck. Alonso has matured massively in the last few years.

If you can be so utterly relaxed as Kimi when driving a F1 car, doesn't that make you mentally strong? To me that's about the same in this situation. When Alonso was coming closer and closer, Kimi didn't start to overdrive the car. He kept on getting his lines and braking points right and won the race. You need some mental strength for that.

Vettel? Certainly has the determination, the skill and the Schumacher-like ability to fire off a dozen qualifying-style laps when he needs to. But daft little mistakes like the one which removed his end-plate and the one which collected some polystyrene track-side furniture, doesn't yet speak of mental strength when he's not right at the front of the grid. Let's not forget his half-spin at Canada last year while being chased by Button too - almost certainly lost him the win. And his passing frequently errs towards mindless - as if his brain switches off when he's required to overtake someone.

He couldn't do much about about losing his front end-plate. Maybe he should watch the races like we do, then he would know how rubbish Senna is in traffic and be even more careful. Running into that DRS sign wasn't that pretty no, although Ricciardo did act like a fool there. The gap to the guy in front was huge, way over 5 car lengths.
He sure showed patience trying to overtake Button. A sign of mental strength to me, nothing mindless about that. It resulted in for me the most beautiful pass of the race. It's not as spectacular as overtaking before Eau Rouge, but overtaking doesn't get any more difficult than the one Vettel made.

Since you're not a fanboy, I take it you didn't watch the race at Canada last year? Vettel was running a wet setup and created a comfy lead in the beginning of the race. That lead disappeared because of the safety car. After the last safety car went in, Vettel managed to create a decent lead again. The team then told him to control his pace, while Button was still storming through the field. It came as a surprise to Red Bull that Button suddenly made it to 2nd and with his intermediate setup on a drying track he closed in on Vettel quickly. Vettel took all risks at the last few laps to keep Button behind him and marginally went over the limit. Although he got overtaken by Button there, it didn't cost him the win. Unless Button would have made an error somewhere up until the DRS zone, but that would have been unlikely. The McLaren was mighty at the back straight and with Button being within the DRS distance, he would have passed Vettel easily there.
I don't understand why people blame Vettel for that moment. It was a tactical error from the team in the first place to slow Vettel down (otherwise he would have won easily) and I can only have respect for Vettel going flat out in those conditions trying not to lose that race. While I was watching the race I felt he never would have been able to keep Button behind. His tiny error only allowed Button to take the lead earlier.

Although Vettel is by no means my favourite driver (don't have one in F1) and I don't rate Vettel above Alonso or Raïkkönen, it still annoys me sometimes that so many people look down upon his performances and twist things in Vettels disadvantage so often.

Of course he has talent, it's just painful to watch him cruise to victory without having to push 100% so often. He gets good points almost regardless of how well he drives, I think he is very strong mentally in qualifying though.

You can't blame Vettel for that. Hamilton, Webber, Button and even Maldonado 'cruised' to (some of) their victories this season. Was that painful to watch too? That's what great drivers do when they start at the front and the car works perfectly.

You can only blame Newey/Red Bull for making the most progress this season and building a car that works on the majority of tracks. Still, it's by no means superior. You need a highly talented driver like Vettel to perform so well. Otherwise Webber would still be in contention for the drivers championship.
 
He couldn't do much about about losing his front end-plate. Maybe he should watch the races like we do, then he would know how rubbish Senna is in traffic and be even more careful. Running into that DRS sign wasn't that pretty no, although Ricciardo did act like a fool there. The gap to the guy in front was huge, way over 5 car lengths.


I dont agree, he's responsible for both mistake for me. He's the one that went and hit Senna, Bruno did absolutely nothing there and he admit he did a mistake behind the pace car as well. Ricciardo didnt got a penalty which he would have if he was the one that did a mistake, especially on Vettel.

I dont dislike him, he's a really good driver for me, he did some crazy things (in a good way) this year even if his car was always in the top 3 if you're talking about racing pace. I also liked very much his overtake on Alonso last year in Monza. So yeah he's a good driver but you can't go blindfold neither and said he didnt do any mistake in Abu Dhabi.
 
RX-7_FD3S
I dont agree, he's responsible for both mistake for me. He's the one that went and hit Senna, Bruno did absolutely nothing.

I disagree. Vettel had a backmarker in front of him and senna made the overtake. Vettel was on the inside, senna in the middle and the backmarker on the outside. We ended up with three cars going in to a tight corner at the same time. Racing incident IMO.
 
homeforsummer
I can't tell whether that's a direct response to my question, or simply the start of another point.

If it's the former then no part of my response said it was only about having a fast car.

If it's the latter, then in McLaren's case it's reliability. I've no doubt at all that without the myriad cock-ups and breakdowns Hamilton has had all year he'd be right up there with Vettel and Alonso. Bad luck has robbed Hamilton of a couple of wins and a few podiums too*. Even Button may have scored a few more points, though I don't think he'd be competing for the title this year as he just doesn't seem to be as happy with the car.

As for Webber, he's not as quick as Vettel, simple as that. But then Massa isn't as quick as Alonso either, and he's been even further down the grid as a result.

It's pretty simple as far as I can see: Alonso has driven the wheels off the car all season to get where he is. Vettel has done likewise, but he's also had comfortably the better car in the latter part of the season, so has been able to capitalise on it more.

* Of course, bad luck has also claimed Vettel and Alonso on a few occasions each too, but I doubt anyone would say they've had it on the same level as Hamilton.

I was just trying to use that question to emphasise my point on how it is a team effort when it comes to winning championships, it is never just only about a driver's ability (Alonso) or the car's pace (Vettel).

That's why that even though the Mclaren has generally had a strong car throughout the season, their drivers' haven't been able to keep up with the title battle due to obvious operational errors.

That's also why Webber isn't in the title battle too, because he hasn't been able to capitalise on the RB8's strong surge in form recently, and failed to minimise points lost from a less competitive RB8 mid-season.
 
Last edited:
If you can be so utterly relaxed as Kimi when driving a F1 car, doesn't that make you mentally strong? To me that's about the same in this situation. When Alonso was coming closer and closer, Kimi didn't start to overdrive the car. He kept on getting his lines and braking points right and won the race. You need some mental strength for that.

It depends. You don't need mental strength to be apathetic about something, and Kimi's coolness often seems to approach apathy.

He couldn't do much about about losing his front end-plate. Maybe he should watch the races like we do, then he would know how rubbish Senna is in traffic and be even more careful. Running into that DRS sign wasn't that pretty no, although Ricciardo did act like a fool there. The gap to the guy in front was huge, way over 5 car lengths.

It sounds like you're making excuses for him. He could easily have avoided knocking his endplate off, by not trying to overtake a driver who himself was in the middle of an overtake. It's easy to knock Senna at the moment, but he can't be blamed for Vettel running into the back of him in the middle of a corner. It was poor judgement on Vettel's part.

And as for Ricciardo, Vettel said himself post race "I probably should have paid more attention". Yes, he should.

Of course, in retrospect that didn't matter anyway as coming in for a new wing and some softer tyres improved his pace somewhat. But it was nothing but a mistake borne from not really considering his surroundings.

He sure showed patience trying to overtake Button. A sign of mental strength to me, nothing mindless about that. It resulted in for me the most beautiful pass of the race. It's not as spectacular as overtaking before Eau Rouge, but overtaking doesn't get any more difficult than the one Vettel made.

Patience? Looked more like inability to get past, to me. And it was no doubt a great pass, but one which relied very heavily on Button not being a dimwit (Vettel again: "Not many other drivers would have given me the space"). It blurred the line between judgement and luck, that's for sure.

Since you're not a fanboy, I take it you didn't watch the race at Canada last year?

All 4.5 hours of it, or however long it was with the rain break.

I don't understand why people blame Vettel for that moment. It was a tactical error from the team in the first place to slow Vettel down (otherwise he would have won easily) and I can only have respect for Vettel going flat out in those conditions trying not to lose that race. While I was watching the race I felt he never would have been able to keep Button behind. His tiny error only allowed Button to take the lead earlier.

Tiny or big is irrelevant: It was an error which essentially cost him the lead of the race. Whether Button would have screamed past later in the lap is academic - what we saw is Vettel under pressure, cracking.

Although Vettel is by no means my favourite driver (don't have one in F1) and I don't rate Vettel above Alonso or Raïkkönen, it still annoys me sometimes that so many people look down upon his performances and twist things in Vettels disadvantage so often.

And if you've been following my posts, you'll be aware that I constantly praise his speed, skill, attitude off-track etc - but it's of no benefit to anyone for people (fanboy or not) to ignore the stuff he's not so good at - a chunk of which involves any time he's under pressure or in traffic.

Seriously, Vettel is very good indeed, but he's not the Messiah. His charge through the field at Abu Dhabi was very impressive indeed, but as Famine has already said on several occasions, some of his driving was incredibly poorly judged. He was lucky not to take himself out of the race on two occasions. If he has mental strength it's in his ability to make life difficult for himself yet still scrape a good result from a weekend.

If anything, he looked better by comparison at that weekend. So many drivers were driving even worse that Vettel's race looked fairly incident-free...
 
Vettel was running a wet setup and created a comfy lead in the beginning of the race.

I never heard Red Bull saying they gave Vettel or Webber a wet setup. However, McLaren said that because there was a 60% chance of rain on race day, they went for a wet setup.
 
I think the stewards should have penalised Vettel for going off the track as Vettel knew full well what he was doing at that time (going off track to overtake someone).

Also, he was under serious pressure to try and get to the front with no consideration for other drivers as well. That did not make me feel happy when I was watching the overtakes and the rather brusque overtakes he did at time.

It kinda felt like a professional foul, as in Vettel wanted to unsettle Grosjean by getting past off the circuit, so when he makes his next legal overtake on Grosjean again, he would be mindful to let him by. It kinda felt like that to me.
 
This tweet from Jenson Button made me chuckle:

Jenson Button ‏@JensonButton
Congrats to Kimi who's head I'm sure is still hurting after Sunday night! ;)
 
I think the stewards should have penalised Vettel for going off the track as Vettel knew full well what he was doing at that time (going off track to overtake someone).

Why? They learned from their mistake in Germany and quickly gave him the position back.
 
Submerged
I think the stewards should have penalised Vettel for going off the track as Vettel knew full well what he was doing at that time (going off track to overtake someone).

Also, he was under serious pressure to try and get to the front with no consideration for other drivers as well. That did not make me feel happy when I was watching the overtakes and the rather brusque overtakes he did at time.

It kinda felt like a professional foul, as in Vettel wanted to unsettle Grosjean by getting past off the circuit, so when he makes his next legal overtake on Grosjean again, he would be mindful to let him by. It kinda felt like that to me.

He gave back the place to Grosjean before completing that lap, as per instructed.

Vettel then went on to overtake Grosjean fair and square the following lap.

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2012/11/05/2012-abu-dhabi-grand-prix-lap-charts/
 
Well, what a race from a track I thought was similar to Boreain. Excellent win for Raikkonen, but Hamilton just doesn't have any luck at the moment.

Being an Alonso fan, I'm naturally pleased with the points he picked up but Vettel drove a blinder to come up all the way to 3rd, even if he does use the very limits of the track and beyond.

We have an interesting finale coming up.
 
I disagree. Vettel had a backmarker in front of him and senna made the overtake. Vettel was on the inside, senna in the middle and the backmarker on the outside. We ended up with three cars going in to a tight corner at the same time. Racing incident IMO.

I just rewatch it and I still think it's a mistake from Vettel, he had a much faster car and he was a bit impatient there. It's a 3 people racing atm and he has a world title in sight, noon of the other drivers are rivals so it was a big risk to not just let Senna pass and overtake him on next DRS zone.
It's not a kamikaze move or anything I agree but still he shouldnt have taken that risk since he's still fighting for the 1st place of the driver championship.

http://youtu.be/iu1B94NBBV0
 
Honestly, it looked like Vettel backed out of it because Senna was so much faster on that straight, but then Senna backed out of it and I guess Vettel got surprised by that.
 
I think the stewards should have penalised Vettel for going off the track as Vettel knew full well what he was doing at that time (going off track to overtake someone).

Why? They learned from their mistake in Germany and quickly gave him the position back.

^ This. Was poor form from Vettel but RBR were quick to correct it, so there's no reason to punish Vettel for it.

The silly thing for Vettel was that he was blatantly quicker than Grosjean anyway, and showed that when he passed him the next lap. He didn't need to pass Grosjean illegally, he just did so out of frustration. Just like he did with Button at Germany.
 
I don't think one should criticize Vettel too much for that rather minor incident (although it was a bit careless given what was on the line), but at the same time I'd say he was mostly at fault for the collision, being that he tried to squeeze through the inside at the last moment (but carried too much speed into the apex) , while having a clear view of Senna's trajectory (which wasn't really eradicate or unpredictable).
 
Why? They learned from their mistake in Germany and quickly gave him the position back.

Because he is Alonso fanboy and he would give Vettel a stop and go 10sec',sorry,20sec penalty!
Of course he has talent, it's just painful to watch him cruise to victory without having to push 100% so often. He gets good points almost regardless of how well he drives, I think he is very strong mentally in qualifying though.

I swear that you wouldn't said this if Alonso cruise to victory every race:tdown:
 
Back