- 2,034
- WNC
- TRLWNC
Driving under the lights.... That always makes the race interesting!
I would love to see the cars go flat out but I would fear of a Las Vegas style accident happening with the cars in a huge pack...Imagine if these guys ran at Talladega...
The 1.5's and California scare me enough...I'd faint if they went around something like Talladega.I would love to see the cars go flat out but I would fear of a Las Vegas style accident happening with the cars in a huge pack...
**** the cost of accidents...peoples lives are at stake! Both the drivers and fans! It'd be like a worse version of a 1.5 mile oval race!The only chance I'd see IndyCar take on Talladega (or even Daytona for that matter) is if a road course configuration is use. I think Talladega has a road course layout, unless it's something I remember from rFactor or something. The cars would be unsafe at speed and in packs at tracks like Daytona or Talladega. I mean, can you imagine "The Big One" with these cars? It would be the world's most expensive scrapyard.
With tonight's action in my home/native state of Texas, and up in northern Texas... good luck to all drivers and teams tonight. Race 'em hard and have fun rocking Texas Motor Speedway.
The 1.5's and California scare me enough...I'd faint if they went around something like Talladega.![]()
First Indycar race with the new aero package at a Mile 1/2 and no one crashed. That's got to be a record somewhere.
No.Imagine if these guys ran at Talladega...
The only chance I'd see IndyCar take on Talladega (or even Daytona for that matter) is if a road course configuration is use. I think Talladega has a road course layout, unless it's something I remember from rFactor or something. The cars would be unsafe at speed and in packs at tracks like Daytona or Talladega. I mean, can you imagine "The Big One" with these cars? It would be the world's most expensive scrapyard.
With tonight's action in my home/native state of Texas, and up in northern Texas... good luck to all drivers and teams tonight. Race 'em hard and have fun rocking Texas Motor Speedway.
But would they want to run the road or the oval. (Or both, like Indy?)
Dega did, but if it still exists i doubt it'd be in raceable condition.Don't know about Dega
You are right about the idea that Daytona and Talladega are too big, but the 1.5 mile tracks aren't all the same. Places like Vegas and Charlotte are similar in the fact that they can be taken flat out. Texas is one of those that isn't the case, and Saturday proved that. And Wheldon died at Vegas in a race with too many drivers at too much speed. Dana died at Homestead Miami because he was unaware that a caution had been thrown, and Homestead was a track where IndyCars always had to lift in the corners, so correlation between the two are slight. As for ChampCar's Texas debacle, they carried more horsepower than IRL did, and they were reaching Indy 500 speeds on it.I don't want Indycar on a Daytona or Talledega oval...heck I don't want Indycar on ovals other than Indy and Pocono. If a stockcar can go around flat out at Dega' and Daytona...then an Indycar car would be doing a steady 230! Now don't take me as an oval hater. I don't hate ovals...ovals are there own unique challenge, it's the safety of them with cars like these that worry me. Indy and Pocono are big enough, and are suited better for them. Because after learning of the 2003(?)Champcar Texas disaster, and since I've started watching in 2005 and going through with two drivers being lost on 1.5's, I don't want anymore events like those again. Could I be a bit coy and cautious of this? Yes. So I guess just take this with a grain of salt.
Why not the short ovals? Iowa is pretty good actually, manages to be competitive without being that dangerous.I don't want Indycar on a Daytona or Talledega oval...heck I don't want Indycar on ovals other than Indy and Pocono. If a stockcar can go around flat out at Dega' and Daytona...then an Indycar car would be doing a steady 230! Now don't take me as an oval hater. I don't hate ovals...ovals are there own unique challenge, it's the safety of them with cars like these that worry me. Indy and Pocono are big enough, and are suited better for them. Because after learning of the 2003(?)Champcar Texas disaster, and since I've started watching in 2005 and going through with two drivers being lost on 1.5's, I don't want anymore events like those again. Could I be a bit coy and cautious of this? Yes. So I guess just take this with a grain of salt.
Whoops forgot about those lol. No I like those a lot, but I was just mentioning the ones that make me worried. The short ovals are cool in my book. 👍 Plus it's another chance to see the road course bodywork.Why not the short ovals? Iowa is pretty good actually, manages to be competitive without being that dangerous.
Texas can be taken flat but they remove all the aero to stop pack racing and drivers fainting.You are right about the idea that Daytona and Talladega are too big, but the 1.5 mile tracks aren't all the same. Places like Vegas and Charlotte are similar in the fact that they can be taken flat out. Texas is one of those that isn't the case, and Saturday proved that. And Wheldon died at Vegas in a race with too many drivers at too much speed. Dana died at Homestead Miami because he was unaware that a caution had been thrown, and Homestead was a track where IndyCars always had to lift in the corners, so correlation between the two are slight. As for ChampCar's Texas debacle, they carried more horsepower than IRL did, and they were reaching Indy 500 speeds on it.
Iowa isn't a 1.5 miler. Its a high banked .8 miler.Why not the short ovals? Iowa is pretty good actually, manages to be competitive without being that dangerous.
But IndyCar hasm't necessarily had that problem recently. They adapted the cars to make it safer. In reality, Vegas would have likely been fine had they not tried to put 10+ drivers that hadn't had any business being there with everyone that had been there all season. Hell, Kimi Raikkonen had been offered a seat for that race, Bernard reached that far. Vegas was a traffic disaster and we lost an amazing IndyCar champion because of it. IndyCar could race on 1.5 mile tracks fine. As long as they reserve the 33 car field for the Indy 500 alone, and make wings from carbon fiber and not cardboard, they could race almost anywhere, and that's their marketability right now.Texas can be taken flat but they remove all the aero to stop pack racing and drivers fainting.
The banking at Texas is equal to Charlottle and both are more then Vegas, just depends on the setup they go with it.
in the IRL era nearly every oval that was 1.5 mile or above was a Pack race as they gave all the cars a little more downforce to allow the entire oval to be flat.
Road course cookie cutters all belong to Tilke.They could do Vegas now TBH, just give them the Superspeedway Aero-config and not the Speedway config they used in 2011, it would be as dull and as boring as Texas.
End of day oval cookie cutters are made for Nascar.
They may be safer right now but is it worth risking the lives of other drivers on those tracks when serious crashes still happen on the ovals?But IndyCar hasm't necessarily had that problem recently. They adapted the cars to make it safer. In reality, Vegas would have likely been fine had they not tried to put 10+ drivers that hadn't had any business being there with everyone that had been there all season. Hell, Kimi Raikkonen had been offered a seat for that race, Bernard reached that far. Vegas was a traffic disaster and we lost an amazing IndyCar champion because of it. IndyCar could race on 1.5 mile tracks fine. As long as they reserve the 33 car field for the Indy 500 alone, and make wings from carbon fiber and not cardboard, they could race almost anywhere, and that's their marketability right now.
I never knew that Tilke was a racing series...Road course cookie cutters all belong to Tilke.
?Road course cookie cutters all belong to Tilke.
I'm referring to Herman Tilke who does the same thing with road courses.?
You understand cookie cutter = 1.5 miler.