Shall I quote your "cheap insult" remark?
quote it as often as you like.......you called me a fanboy for no other reason than I hold a different opinion about a game than you do....that is a cheap insult.
There's nothing to debate, you have stated you love GT5 and think it's great even the way it came off store shelves.
In my opinion that's absurd. Most of what you say in GT5's defense are catch phrases "GT5 lovers" (since you get upset over fanboy) always use repeatedly.
Things like "don't like it don't do it" blah blah blah. I didn't say I was forced to do it, or that I completely hate it, or that it doesn't belong in the game, those are all words you tried to make me say, based off your own opinions of what you think I was saying.
I'm glad you finally see that for what it is.......just your opinion. Everybody is entitled to their opinion just as everybody is free in a public forum to disagre with that and explain their reasons.
You are disapointed with GT5......I think it's a damn good game. We are free to discuss the reasons why we feel the way we do.....and I'm happy to do so when you continue to make posts such as this one and leave the cheap insults out of it.
However, "If you don't enjoy it don't do it" isn't just a catchphrase. I would think it's the way most people play any game. There are plenty of games that I have enjoyed aspects of but not enjoyed other parts off.....I play the bits I like and dont play the bits I dont. Seems like the smarter thing to do to me.
Personally I did enjoy b-spec. It's not my favourite part of the game by a long shot but I did enjoy it. Passing the historic race series was probably my favourite part of b-spec.
If I hadn't enjoyed it......I simply wouldn't have played it......there is more than enough content in the rest of the game to keep me occupied.
It's not a catchphrase......it's common sense.
Fact is, if someone sat down with a stopwatch, and timed one of every A-Spec and B-Spec event and totaled them together, B-Spec would be over half of that time.
If you timed level 0-40 in each, provided a good driver, B-Spec would probably be over two-thirds of the time.
what a very odd way to judge content.......
what if my bob finished a race first time but it took me 4 attempts......would you say a-spec had more content just because it took longer to finish? What if my bob was hopeless and it took him 50 attempts to finish a race I did first time......would you say that b-spec was 95% of the game instead of 2/3rds.......
that's just the oddest way I have ever heard somebody try to measure game content.
what if I set my bob racing but then turn over to watch the football but obviously have to sit through all the a-spec races......is a-spec now 99% of the content because I am not actually playing the game when b-spec is running.....
very odd.
Not to mention the longest races in b-spec are the exact same length as the a-spec equivalents......the 24 hour nurburgring and le mans races as well as the 9 hour race are the same length in both. Same for the 4 hour roadster, 300km, 1000km and 200 mile races.
It seems like you are coming up with an incredibly bizare way to measure content just to try to claim that b-spec is 2/3rds of the game when that system is an utterly preposterous way to measure given all of the above.
And that still doesn't address that there are licence tests and special events to pass for you as a player that are not in b-spec at all.......does none of that content count (seasonal events also if you have an internet connection.)
I think to claim that b-spec makes up 2/3rds of the game is just silly.
What does that have to do with B-Spec being over half the "career" mode?
