Man, play the actual game. You won't be able to sleep after this.
Yes, the rFactor graphics is that terrifying, worse than GT4
I'm playing it as i post on these forums, GT5 was hard for me to play at first because of how blurry it looks, i'm not the only PC gamer to think the same, my eyes had to adjust. I thought there was something wrong because the incar textures were so blurry, some cars you can barely read the dials.
GT4 looks horrific, and if you put a GT5 next to that Rfactor at screen resolution you would see the Rfactor looks so much sharper. GT5 has a better engine, better lighting and in some cases better textures, but its covered in cloudy/jaggyness.
The cars in Rfactor are what i am comparing to GT5 though, like the screenies i pointed out in the last page, they make GT5 look dated, if you put the F1 cars side by side then Rfactor looks better.
If GT5 was on the PC it would have the option of being able to pump up texture filtering, shadows and resolution.. No more blurries, no more jaggies and no more glitched jaggy shadows. There would be memory left over to give the AI some brains so they dont just plough into you.
In Rfactor if you crash, the AI attempts to avoid the accident/spin off, and sometimes it causes them to crash trying to avoid it, also the cars actually drive fast where as the AI in GT5 is painfully slow 99% of the time.
But i love GT5, i never said i didnt like it, i said it would be better on the PC, as all the current popular multi platform games have been (MW2, F1 2010), consoles are dated and all the developers can do is try to stretch out the power. Sure PC's are more expensive, but not to forget that PC's were already ahead of the PS3 before it came out, most people have PC's that are far beyond the power of any console.
