It isn't for Matech who have been winning a lot of races with their FR500GT3's.225 grand? im sure if you buy a stock one, and build it to those exact specs, it wouldnt cost that much lol...........I think spending 225k on a mustang is a bad investment alone, idc if its racing or not.
But Ford has had that engine for 10 years. The 3650 crimes against humanity.
But Ford has had that engine for 10 years. The 3650 crimes against humanity.
This is true, but I have no idea what the performance figures, much less the price, will look like.
I actually got a phone call from my Dad today about the Camaro, he just heard about the 540 BHP Cobra and he wanted to know if they're doing something better than the SS (he wants a Camaro with the LS7), but obviously, they haven't told us anything. Sounds like the $32K SS is right up his alley, but he hasn't gotten a call from Berger yet on his wait-list spot.
...Still, the fact that I can get a V6 Camaro RS for about the $25-27K price range, I'd call that a decent alternative to the Mustang despite the 100 lb weight difference and the loss of 10 BHP overall.
The Hyundai will be an interesting alternative, but as long as I have the bowtie option, I don't think it will be as high on my list. But, then again, the thought of a turbo model is a pretty good one, especially if I'm looking at the mid $20K range.
Impressive numbers, surely making it an extremely reasonable option to the 370Z, but with those added bonuses comes a pretty major increase in price. If my calculations are correct, a GT with the "Track Pack" is going to run $30K... Right where the SS and the R/T kick in at. To me, the GT should be the "value-priced" option of the three, and running $3000 over the previous GT price of about $27K (nicely equipped)... Its a a small stumble.
It probably won't perform any better and it'll be much more expensive. I don't think Roush will even try it. The chassis was not designed for it. It will not work the way an independent rear suspension is supposed to. The supercharged SVT Cobra was afflicted with wheel hop problems that hampered its drag strip performance--problems that the 350Z especially and just about every other competitor doesn't have to deal with. They were designed as a whole, not retrofitted. Retrofitting parts never works as well as designing them as a whole.Just wait, an IRS will be coming from Roush. I almost bet they are working on one right now if not testing it. Alot of people are screaming for it. My Ford dealer has people asking for one as an option. The word is getting around...
The supercharged SVT Cobra was afflicted with wheel hop problems that hampered its drag strip performance
The chassis underpinning the current Mustang is a simplified version of what was in the Lincoln LS.The chassis was not designed for it.
And was still faster than the GT500 was.The supercharged SVT Cobra was afflicted with wheel hop problems that hampered its drag strip performance
The SVT Cobra was retrofitted with IRS (chassis being 20 years old and all), and it was a better handling car because of it (compared to the prior SVT Cobra).Retrofitting parts never works as well as designing them as a whole.
That being said, I agree with this bit anyways.The car can already perform wonderfully--why spend more money for marginal increases at best? I say wait until the next full chassis redesign.
The cost to benefit just doesn't make enough sense. The car can already perform wonderfully--why spend more money for marginal increases at best? I say wait until the next full chassis redesign.
And yet, its still faster at the drag strip than the LRA GT500:
It almost makes you wonder what the point of the GT500 is.