- 4,487
- YorkshireLand
- SVTlover
I'm really looking forward to seeing what they bring to the grid. I hope they become competitive, I'm sure if they do it'd help F1 become more popular than ever in the US.
And all of them are slower than the Vandoornes and the Marciellos of the world.All have considerable openwheel road racing experience and are pretty quick.
Nelson Piquet Jr., Miguel Paludo, Marcos Ambrose (Might be too late though, turns 38 this year), and AJ Allmendinger (Although he is in the first year of a three year contract with JTG) are the only four NASCAR drivers with any real shot at making it in F1.I can't think of any NASCAR drivers who could make the transition (though I don't follow the sport too closely). Kyle Larson stands out at the only driver with the faintest chance of success.
And what about Sato, who is currently racing in Indy Car, as his team mate?How's about Montoya?, he's kinda got an American following and didn't suck when in F1.
How's about Montoya?, he's kinda got an American following and didn't suck when in F1.
Pretty sure he said he has no interest in returning to F1.
And what about Sato, who is currently racing in Indy Car, as his team mate?![]()
Honda has 2 developmental drivers in GP2 at the moment... Takuya Izawa and Kimiya Sato (no relation to Takuma Sato). Plus, Haas wants Ferrari power.If Honda convinces Haas on using their engines, its plausible for Sato to be in a seat.
And all of them are slower than the Vandoornes and the Marciellos of the world.
Right, because the demand for experienced drivers worked out so well for Lotus/Caterham in 2010.
I can't think of any NASCAR drivers who could make the transition (though I don't follow the sport too closely). Kyle Larson stands out at the only driver with the faintest chance of success.
Right, because the demand for experienced drivers worked out so well for Lotus/Caterham in 2010.
Maybe that was the case once upon a time, but in this day and age, rookies arrive on the scene with a ton of open-wheel experience. It might not be specific to Formula 1, but they do have experience. And if they are going to limit themselves to a young American driver when all of the available candidates are second-tier drivers at best, then it makes no sense to further limit themselves to an experienced driver who is probably going to be someone like Adrian Sutil or Jean-Eric Vergne who has no real opportunities for advancement.
And I'm quite confident that as long as he is prioritising nationality over talent, he is going to be trying for a long time. Especially when he paints himself into a corner with his second driver, picking someone who is experienced, but a second-tier driver in their own right.I'm quite confident he is going to make it known that this is an American team trying to win in F1.
And I'm quite confident that as long as he is prioritising nationality over talent, he is going to be trying for a long time. Especially when he paints himself into a corner with his second driver, picking someone who is experienced, but a second-tier driver in their own right.
If Haas insists on an American driver, then his only real option is Conor Daly. He might not have the security of a constant seat, like Rossi, and he might have one hand tied behind his back by driving for Lazarus, but he at least has untapped potential.
Haas has said that 2015 is too soon, and 2016 too far away. His best move would be to get Dallara to build a chassis and do a one-year deal with Ferrari. Take any two drivers, but back Daly in GP2 and place him somewhere like ART. Use that relationship to get a Honda engine deal in 2016, and put Daly in the seat when the team is fully operational.
They intend to have a forward base inside Europe that they can use to maintain the cars and turn them over between races.Haas already is working out of the US, keeping it American has put him at a permanent disadvantage already.
Drivers are secondary to the car in F1 anyway. Ferrari has the best drivers, but a junk car.
Haas already is working out of the US, keeping it American has put him at a permanent disadvantage already.
More importantly it will be interesting to see if the number of American open wheel talent increases over the next few years if they think F1 is a viable option to NASCAR, in large part thanks to Haas.
We already have three rounds in the Americas; Montreal, Austin and Interlagos. Mexico is apparently joining in 2015, Port Imperial has been given another chance, and the organisers of Long Beach are looking to get Formula 1 back. So, in theory, that is as many as six races in the Americas, and it doesn't take into account potential bids like Argentina. Haas will have an advantage in having a base in America - to the point where other teams might set up a forward base there, too.How has keeping it American put him at a disadvantage as far as HQ goes? Also the second hand situation they have in Europe as F1fanatic reported.
The problem is geography. America is quite large, which means travel costs are going to be higher than in Europe. That will drive budgets up, demanding more sponsorship.Also a feeder series closer to the U.S. would help as well...not Indy Lights.
We already have three rounds in the Americas; Montreal, Austin and Interlagos. Mexico is apparently joining in 2015, Port Imperial has been given another chance, and the organisers of Long Beach are looking to get Formula 1 back. So, in theory, that is as many as six races in the Americas, and it doesn't take into account potential bids like Argentina. Haas will have an advantage in having a base in America - to the point where other teams might set up a forward base there, too.
The problem is geography. America is quite large, which means travel costs are going to be higher than in Europe. That will drive budgets up, demanding more sponsorship.
To my mind, the best way forward would be to establish a Formula 3 Americas series, like European Formula 3. It would make a series that is not just viable for American drivers, but Canadian, Mexican and South Americans as well. Again, that would balloon the costs out a bit, but by encouraging local drivers, it will hopefully encourage more participation from local sponsors. On top of that, run it as a support event to the Grands Prix to get those local drivers some exposure.Yes that's true, but as it stands the options available aren't very cost friendly to begin with. Just giving up on the idea without ever trying is a bit unmotivated.
To my mind, the best way forward would be to establish a Formula 3 Americas series, like European Formula 3. It would make a series that is not just viable for American drivers, but Canadian, Mexican and South Americans as well. Again, that would balloon the costs out a bit, but by encouraging local drivers, it will hopefully encourage more participation from local sponsors. On top of that, run it as a support event to the Grands Prix to get those local drivers some exposure.
On the other hand, he has said that waiting until 2016 is too late. When they start depends on what kind of deals they can do with suppliers, and how soon they can reach those agreements. They have two major advantages in that the rules are likely to remain stable for 2015, given that this year has been so expensive (though the noses will be redesigned, which will demand work across the whole car). Nor have those rules been published yet, so Haas will be in the same boat as everyone else when it comes time to start designing.Sounds like Haas might not enter F1 until 2016