Gran Turismo 7 Custom Race thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter 05XR8
  • 3,869 comments
  • 621,717 views
Thx for your suggestions!
I will try other tracks for sure but I don't think I'm happy with a pace car in a one make race.
I will also try boost strong and see what this does. Haven't used this one for ages.
Ah, yes, you can’t use a pace car unless you set each car yourself. I tend to do this with one-makes, anyway, as you get to use distinct liveries and tunes to shake up the conga line. Bit pricy, though!

Without the pace car, I have never been able to shake the train off of me. I also think this lead runner helps encourage the followers to attempt passes, as opposed to just keeping up with you. Get out what you put in, I suppose.

I haven’t used Strong Boost in years but let us know! I DO find myself preferring Weak Slipstream (as opposed to Realistic) when in road cars, for the increased passing opportunities without making things too ridiculous.
 
Ah, yes, you can’t use a pace car unless you set each car yourself. I tend to do this with one-makes, anyway, as you get to use distinct liveries and tunes to shake up the conga line. Bit pricy, though!
That's not the problem. I do have a full custom grid. But seeing a car that doesn't belong here would just ruin it for me I'm afraid.

edit About slipstream....I never used anything else except "realistic" until now. How is weak compared to realistic?
 
Last edited:
Huge wall of text incoming. You have been warned!

Man, this game can give such highs and such frustrating lows.

I'm a custom race enthusiast, but I dropped my beloved Porsche series (around de 1995 ClubSport model, did 20 liveries, made scripts for randomizing ballast/performance limiters and Excel sheets to keep track of events, championships, stats and everything) back in April simply because the rubberbanding with either AI method gets into my nerves and makes everything kinda pointless.

But I didn't keep track of the game, and thought that maybe things have improved since then. With Spec III about to drop, a new DLC, and the fact that I got myself a PSVR2 for testing, it made sense to resume the Porsche Cup season with the highlight of the series: a 2-hour race at Le Mans (24h complete cycle).

I absolutely love the real world event and the track. I am no alien, but I think I am pretty handy around La Sarthe: if not extremely quick, at least I know my way around it, so I don't make mistakes, know how to position the car, where to push and where to pass. I was very keen on doing the endurance and did it yesterday.

As I mentioned, I use a script to randomize the grid, since there is no qualifying, and the algorithm decided to put me on pole surrounded by a bunch of rivals with very similar ballast/performance modifiers, which would make things interesting, or so I thought.

Race starts and I could do the math: I would need to set engine mapping to 2 and 3, alternating it through the lap, in order to make 4 laps per stint. As the track is long, I knew it would be pointless to try and Scott Dixon the thing to squeeze out one more lap per stint. After the first two stints, stopping at laps 4 and 8 with everyone else, it was clear the race would go for 24 laps, but we’d need one more to round out the 2-hour mark.

That got me thinking: the AI will more likely than not stick to the plan and go stopping at each 4 laps, so they'll do 4-8-12-16-20-24, which means a pit stop at the end of 24, opening of the last lap. With that reasoning, and having a pack of 4 to 5 cars glued to me all the time (except for the Indy and Porsche curves, where Sophy drops a bit), I decided to anticipate my 4th pit window to lap 15th so I would make my last stop at the 23th lap: the goal was to make things more exciting and to build a bigger gap.

And so I did. Went to the pits while leading on the 15th lap. Got back to the track at 16th position, managed to get ahead of one car and, as predicted, everyone in front stopped on lap 16, so I was on the lead again. Playing in VR, I didn’t have the map to gauge the gap, but I was pretty sure it was enough to keep them out of my mirrors. Yay! It works. Except… hum, it didn’t. I didn’t see anyone for the first few corners, but halfway down Mulsanne... yeah, there they are, stuck behind me again. That instantly reminded me why this series wasn’t finished.

But maybe I was wrong! Maybe the VR didn't resolve the field on my mirrors, maybe I didn't actually made that much of a gap. So let's see what happens coming the next pit window. Again, I went to the pits a lap earlier (19th) and dropped to 12th this time, meaning the field was stretching. Next lap, 20th, everybody was pitting and I got the lead again. Same impression: I am ahead by some margin, but got my companions around me way before the end of the Mulsanne straigth.

At this point, I was a bit annoyed, but kept going and repeated the process for the last pit window: stopped at lap 23 and the AI the next lap. Dropped to 8th in my last stop because It was basically a stop-and-go: I needed fuel for just 2 laps. Got to the main straight as everybody in front of me were busy refueling and was 1st again. But, this time around, I hit pause, removed the VR and watched the map (because of course this is a racing game which doesn't show you your gap to your rivals because if it did you would notice right away something very weird happening).

And yeah, I could clearly see that I was far enough ahead to have a noticeable gap to the field as they were leaving the pits. I don't know how to guestimate, but let's say it was like 7-10 seconds: it was sizeable on map. Middle of Mulsanne? Everyone was back with me again :banghead:.

I mean, man, this... sucks!

So, to recap:

  • I did a good race, no mistakes, drove really well
  • Facing a competition that, at first, I took honestly as rivals matching my performance because we were in quite similar cars, I had to think ahead
  • So I came up with a different strategy from the AI to pull away from them
  • I took the risk and broke away from their pattern
  • The strategy worked because I could actually notice the gap
  • Felt good to resume the lead at that last lap, like a win over the machine! Take that, Sophy!
  • But the game devalues my effort, nullifies my performance and strategy, and just bunch everyone together again because reasons.

It was really frustrating and made me rage-quit the race remembering perfectly why I dropped custom races back in April: it’s pointless. I don’t see the fun in having to invest inordinate amounts of time crafting crazy scenarios just to circumvent a game-design anti-pattern: the damned rubberbanding.

Look, Polyphony (lol, as if they’d read this), I know why you insist on it in single-player content: most GT players are casuals, they need cars around them all the time to stay engaged and not feel bored. I get that. I really understand this and I am really not against it. But you need to allow people doing custom-races to disable this if they want: create a slider, put together a clear description of what said "AI engagement" slider defines in game and let us just have fun with real racing, make the rubberbanding on by default, it's fine as long as I can turn it off if I want. I really like Sophy as it is, but fealing cheated out of my results simply nukes any fun I could be having with it.

This very thread is a testament to how detrimental this feature is: instead of discussing actual, real, racing, most posts go about what happens when you try this and that in order to make the racing feel less atificial.

The rubberbanding is a device to keep players coming back but it is keeping me away from the game. I will finish the Power Pack events and probably drop GT once more, maybe coming back eventually to see a new car or track they add to it and I don't think I will bother with the PSVR2 either: is amazing, but too much money into an accessory that I might turn on a few times a year. Which is sad. Really is, because the potential is here and it's just enormous. I wish I could finish my Porsche series and start my WSC 1992 (I’ve already made liveries for 6 Group-C cars and 14 GTs, but I have zero drive to actually play with them). The F3500-A and B cars are absolutely glorious, and I’d love to run championships with them - but like this? Meh.
 
Huge wall of text incoming. You have been warned!

Man, this game can give such highs and such frustrating lows.

I'm a custom race enthusiast, but I dropped my beloved Porsche series (around de 1995 ClubSport model, did 20 liveries, made scripts for randomizing ballast/performance limiters and Excel sheets to keep track of events, championships, stats and everything) back in April simply because the rubberbanding with either AI method gets into my nerves and makes everything kinda pointless.

But I didn't keep track of the game, and thought that maybe things have improved since then. With Spec III about to drop, a new DLC, and the fact that I got myself a PSVR2 for testing, it made sense to resume the Porsche Cup season with the highlight of the series: a 2-hour race at Le Mans (24h complete cycle).

I absolutely love the real world event and the track. I am no alien, but I think I am pretty handy around La Sarthe: if not extremely quick, at least I know my way around it, so I don't make mistakes, know how to position the car, where to push and where to pass. I was very keen on doing the endurance and did it yesterday.

As I mentioned, I use a script to randomize the grid, since there is no qualifying, and the algorithm decided to put me on pole surrounded by a bunch of rivals with very similar ballast/performance modifiers, which would make things interesting, or so I thought.

Race starts and I could do the math: I would need to set engine mapping to 2 and 3, alternating it through the lap, in order to make 4 laps per stint. As the track is long, I knew it would be pointless to try and Scott Dixon the thing to squeeze out one more lap per stint. After the first two stints, stopping at laps 4 and 8 with everyone else, it was clear the race would go for 24 laps, but we’d need one more to round out the 2-hour mark.

That got me thinking: the AI will more likely than not stick to the plan and go stopping at each 4 laps, so they'll do 4-8-12-16-20-24, which means a pit stop at the end of 24, opening of the last lap. With that reasoning, and having a pack of 4 to 5 cars glued to me all the time (except for the Indy and Porsche curves, where Sophy drops a bit), I decided to anticipate my 4th pit window to lap 15th so I would make my last stop at the 23th lap: the goal was to make things more exciting and to build a bigger gap.

And so I did. Went to the pits while leading on the 15th lap. Got back to the track at 16th position, managed to get ahead of one car and, as predicted, everyone in front stopped on lap 16, so I was on the lead again. Playing in VR, I didn’t have the map to gauge the gap, but I was pretty sure it was enough to keep them out of my mirrors. Yay! It works. Except… hum, it didn’t. I didn’t see anyone for the first few corners, but halfway down Mulsanne... yeah, there they are, stuck behind me again. That instantly reminded me why this series wasn’t finished.

But maybe I was wrong! Maybe the VR didn't resolve the field on my mirrors, maybe I didn't actually made that much of a gap. So let's see what happens coming the next pit window. Again, I went to the pits a lap earlier (19th) and dropped to 12th this time, meaning the field was stretching. Next lap, 20th, everybody was pitting and I got the lead again. Same impression: I am ahead by some margin, but got my companions around me way before the end of the Mulsanne straigth.

At this point, I was a bit annoyed, but kept going and repeated the process for the last pit window: stopped at lap 23 and the AI the next lap. Dropped to 8th in my last stop because It was basically a stop-and-go: I needed fuel for just 2 laps. Got to the main straight as everybody in front of me were busy refueling and was 1st again. But, this time around, I hit pause, removed the VR and watched the map (because of course this is a racing game which doesn't show you your gap to your rivals because if it did you would notice right away something very weird happening).

And yeah, I could clearly see that I was far enough ahead to have a noticeable gap to the field as they were leaving the pits. I don't know how to guestimate, but let's say it was like 7-10 seconds: it was sizeable on map. Middle of Mulsanne? Everyone was back with me again :banghead:.

I mean, man, this... sucks!

So, to recap:

  • I did a good race, no mistakes, drove really well
  • Facing a competition that, at first, I took honestly as rivals matching my performance because we were in quite similar cars, I had to think ahead
  • So I came up with a different strategy from the AI to pull away from them
  • I took the risk and broke away from their pattern
  • The strategy worked because I could actually notice the gap
  • Felt good to resume the lead at that last lap, like a win over the machine! Take that, Sophy!
  • But the game devalues my effort, nullifies my performance and strategy, and just bunch everyone together again because reasons.

It was really frustrating and made me rage-quit the race remembering perfectly why I dropped custom races back in April: it’s pointless. I don’t see the fun in having to invest inordinate amounts of time crafting crazy scenarios just to circumvent a game-design anti-pattern: the damned rubberbanding.

Look, Polyphony (lol, as if they’d read this), I know why you insist on it in single-player content: most GT players are casuals, they need cars around them all the time to stay engaged and not feel bored. I get that. I really understand this and I am really not against it. But you need to allow people doing custom-races to disable this if they want: create a slider, put together a clear description of what said "AI engagement" slider defines in game and let us just have fun with real racing, make the rubberbanding on by default, it's fine as long as I can turn it off if I want. I really like Sophy as it is, but fealing cheated out of my results simply nukes any fun I could be having with it.

This very thread is a testament to how detrimental this feature is: instead of discussing actual, real, racing, most posts go about what happens when you try this and that in order to make the racing feel less atificial.

The rubberbanding is a device to keep players coming back but it is keeping me away from the game. I will finish the Power Pack events and probably drop GT once more, maybe coming back eventually to see a new car or track they add to it and I don't think I will bother with the PSVR2 either: is amazing, but too much money into an accessory that I might turn on a few times a year. Which is sad. Really is, because the potential is here and it's just enormous. I wish I could finish my Porsche series and start my WSC 1992 (I’ve already made liveries for 6 Group-C cars and 14 GTs, but I have zero drive to actually play with them). The F3500-A and B cars are absolutely glorious, and I’d love to run championships with them - but like this? Meh.
Yes, the rubber-banding sucks.

There is a way to prevent the rubber-banding though, which has been discussed and tested in this thread a few times.

Basically, never take the lead. Give the race a single "rabbit" car that is so fast you'll never overtake it. For example, in a Le Mans race you could add a prototype that will come round and lap you once or twice.

As long as you aren't in the lead, Sophy (set to Weak boost) will not change it's pace, no rubber-banding.

Of course that means you can't win the race unfortunately, but if you want to have fun with endurance racing this is the best method.

Edit: I see this is discussed just above! Sorry for the repeat...
 
Last edited:
Huge wall of text incoming. You have been warned!

Man, this game can give such highs and such frustrating lows.

I'm a custom race enthusiast, but I dropped my beloved Porsche series (around de 1995 ClubSport model, did 20 liveries, made scripts for randomizing ballast/performance limiters and Excel sheets to keep track of events, championships, stats and everything) back in April simply because the rubberbanding with either AI method gets into my nerves and makes everything kinda pointless.

But I didn't keep track of the game, and thought that maybe things have improved since then. With Spec III about to drop, a new DLC, and the fact that I got myself a PSVR2 for testing, it made sense to resume the Porsche Cup season with the highlight of the series: a 2-hour race at Le Mans (24h complete cycle).

I absolutely love the real world event and the track. I am no alien, but I think I am pretty handy around La Sarthe: if not extremely quick, at least I know my way around it, so I don't make mistakes, know how to position the car, where to push and where to pass. I was very keen on doing the endurance and did it yesterday.

As I mentioned, I use a script to randomize the grid, since there is no qualifying, and the algorithm decided to put me on pole surrounded by a bunch of rivals with very similar ballast/performance modifiers, which would make things interesting, or so I thought.

Race starts and I could do the math: I would need to set engine mapping to 2 and 3, alternating it through the lap, in order to make 4 laps per stint. As the track is long, I knew it would be pointless to try and Scott Dixon the thing to squeeze out one more lap per stint. After the first two stints, stopping at laps 4 and 8 with everyone else, it was clear the race would go for 24 laps, but we’d need one more to round out the 2-hour mark.

That got me thinking: the AI will more likely than not stick to the plan and go stopping at each 4 laps, so they'll do 4-8-12-16-20-24, which means a pit stop at the end of 24, opening of the last lap. With that reasoning, and having a pack of 4 to 5 cars glued to me all the time (except for the Indy and Porsche curves, where Sophy drops a bit), I decided to anticipate my 4th pit window to lap 15th so I would make my last stop at the 23th lap: the goal was to make things more exciting and to build a bigger gap.

And so I did. Went to the pits while leading on the 15th lap. Got back to the track at 16th position, managed to get ahead of one car and, as predicted, everyone in front stopped on lap 16, so I was on the lead again. Playing in VR, I didn’t have the map to gauge the gap, but I was pretty sure it was enough to keep them out of my mirrors. Yay! It works. Except… hum, it didn’t. I didn’t see anyone for the first few corners, but halfway down Mulsanne... yeah, there they are, stuck behind me again. That instantly reminded me why this series wasn’t finished.

But maybe I was wrong! Maybe the VR didn't resolve the field on my mirrors, maybe I didn't actually made that much of a gap. So let's see what happens coming the next pit window. Again, I went to the pits a lap earlier (19th) and dropped to 12th this time, meaning the field was stretching. Next lap, 20th, everybody was pitting and I got the lead again. Same impression: I am ahead by some margin, but got my companions around me way before the end of the Mulsanne straigth.

At this point, I was a bit annoyed, but kept going and repeated the process for the last pit window: stopped at lap 23 and the AI the next lap. Dropped to 8th in my last stop because It was basically a stop-and-go: I needed fuel for just 2 laps. Got to the main straight as everybody in front of me were busy refueling and was 1st again. But, this time around, I hit pause, removed the VR and watched the map (because of course this is a racing game which doesn't show you your gap to your rivals because if it did you would notice right away something very weird happening).

And yeah, I could clearly see that I was far enough ahead to have a noticeable gap to the field as they were leaving the pits. I don't know how to guestimate, but let's say it was like 7-10 seconds: it was sizeable on map. Middle of Mulsanne? Everyone was back with me again :banghead:.

I mean, man, this... sucks!

So, to recap:

  • I did a good race, no mistakes, drove really well
  • Facing a competition that, at first, I took honestly as rivals matching my performance because we were in quite similar cars, I had to think ahead
  • So I came up with a different strategy from the AI to pull away from them
  • I took the risk and broke away from their pattern
  • The strategy worked because I could actually notice the gap
  • Felt good to resume the lead at that last lap, like a win over the machine! Take that, Sophy!
  • But the game devalues my effort, nullifies my performance and strategy, and just bunch everyone together again because reasons.

It was really frustrating and made me rage-quit the race remembering perfectly why I dropped custom races back in April: it’s pointless. I don’t see the fun in having to invest inordinate amounts of time crafting crazy scenarios just to circumvent a game-design anti-pattern: the damned rubberbanding.

Look, Polyphony (lol, as if they’d read this), I know why you insist on it in single-player content: most GT players are casuals, they need cars around them all the time to stay engaged and not feel bored. I get that. I really understand this and I am really not against it. But you need to allow people doing custom-races to disable this if they want: create a slider, put together a clear description of what said "AI engagement" slider defines in game and let us just have fun with real racing, make the rubberbanding on by default, it's fine as long as I can turn it off if I want. I really like Sophy as it is, but fealing cheated out of my results simply nukes any fun I could be having with it.

This very thread is a testament to how detrimental this feature is: instead of discussing actual, real, racing, most posts go about what happens when you try this and that in order to make the racing feel less atificial.

The rubberbanding is a device to keep players coming back but it is keeping me away from the game. I will finish the Power Pack events and probably drop GT once more, maybe coming back eventually to see a new car or track they add to it and I don't think I will bother with the PSVR2 either: is amazing, but too much money into an accessory that I might turn on a few times a year. Which is sad. Really is, because the potential is here and it's just enormous. I wish I could finish my Porsche series and start my WSC 1992 (I’ve already made liveries for 6 Group-C cars and 14 GTs, but I have zero drive to actually play with them). The F3500-A and B cars are absolutely glorious, and I’d love to run championships with them - but like this? Meh.
Pace car. Yes it might be weird seeing a car that shouldn't be there, but it 100% eliminates the rubberbanding effect. And if you pick a car that is only 2-3 seconds faster than you per lap, once it disappears into the distance, you'll never see it again.
 
Here's to hope that they didn't want to detract from the PP and we will get Sophy 3.0 and more settings in custom races in the next few months.
Exactly what I'm hoping for.

I haven't bought the Power Pack, the cars look nice but I like racing in the pack, trading places for maybe a podium, not running away and winning every race.

Yesterday I raced the stock 296 against random Sophy opposition at the Nords for 30 minutes, it's a beast to control on hard tyres and proper fun battling with!
 
Exactly what I'm hoping for.

I haven't bought the Power Pack, the cars look nice but I like racing in the pack, trading places for maybe a podium, not running away and winning every race.

Yesterday I raced the stock 296 against random Sophy opposition at the Nords for 30 minutes, it's a beast to control on hard tyres and proper fun battling with!
Some of the power pack races are nearly unbeatable. But only because a single car pulls away from the field.
 
Yes, the rubber-banding sucks.

There is a way to prevent the rubber-banding though, which has been discussed and tested in this thread a few times.

Basically, never take the lead. Give the race a single "rabbit" car that is so fast you'll never overtake it. For example, in a Le Mans race you could add a prototype that will come round and lap you once or twice.

As long as you aren't in the lead, Sophy (set to Weak boost) will not change it's pace, no rubber-banding.

Of course that means you can't win the race unfortunately, but if you want to have fun with endurance racing this is the best method.

Edit: I see this is discussed just above! Sorry for the repeat...

Pace car. Yes it might be weird seeing a car that shouldn't be there, but it 100% eliminates the rubberbanding effect. And if you pick a car that is only 2-3 seconds faster than you per lap, once it disappears into the distance, you'll never see it again.
thank you both for the input, nice to know that there is this option, but it isn't for me, it would completely break the immersion.
 
thank you both for the input, nice to know that there is this option, but it isn't for me, it would completely break the immersion.
If you use an actual pace car you can get a cool photo at the start of the race.

20970204047297218.webp


I usually start at the back of the field so I very rarely ever see it. Once I get towards the front, its on the other side of the track somewhere. Out of sight, out of mind.
 
That's not the problem. I do have a full custom grid. But seeing a car that doesn't belong here would just ruin it for me I'm afraid.

edit About slipstream....I never used anything else except "realistic" until now. How is weak compared to realistic?
Some good additional points re: ‘pace car’ between this/prior post - hope we can convert you! ;) It really does dramatically improve the experience, provided you can live with there being a secret p1 40sec ahead of you, etc. Safety Cars make headcanon-appropriate rabbits for me, or as another user mentioned, you can flesh out an entire faster ‘class’ of a few cars that race each other ahead of your group. Curse the 20 grid slot limit!

Re: Slipstream, it just adds a little more oomph to the draft. “Strong” is a little too weird, in my experience, and I wouldn’t use “Weak” with Gr. or other high-downforce cars. Sub-600pp road cars barely pick up any “Realistic” slipstream, as it is, so Weak tends to give me a good balance. I do it primarily so a tailing AI has a better chance of attacking me in the braking zone.
 
So I did a bit of testing today and I'm no wiser then before😟

The plan was to do one race for every boost setting and see how it turns out.
But since boost is related to track position I thought that it wouldn't make sense to start last. So I went for mid pack on P11, for every race. I also used grid start.

First I took my N-One grid to Yas Marina. This was the boost off race, 5 laps.
I lost 4 positions at start. Had some good fights at the twisty sections, but on the straights the AI is just very slow. Took P1 at the end of the third. AI kept tailgating me but didn't attack. Not the best race, but I've had worse.

1000026097.webp


Next I went to Mount Panorama for the boost weak race. 4 laps.
Again I lost a few positions at the start. I really have to work on my grid start😄
And then it happened: 4 laps of good, clean racing! Side by side up the mountain without any AI crashing into me!
And the pacing was really good also! I got P1 at the last lap up at the mountain.
And this brings us to the only downside of this race. AI is braking without any reason up at the mountain. Feels like they're brake checking you when you're close. That's the spot where I passed Max comfortably.
But this aside it was a really good race and pretty much what I'm looking for!

1000026098.webp


Third test, boost strong, Spa, 4 laps
First corner was chaotic and I fell back to P16. But AI was slow just everywhere and I went up to P3 within the first lap. Nope, that's not what I want.
So I abandoned the race and went back to boost weak, hoping to repeat the experience from Mount Panorama. But nope. P2 at the end of first lap, P1 at the Kemmel straight on second lap.

1000026099.webp


I have no idea what to make of this. It feels completely random, or at least strongly track dependent.

Tomorrow I will try something else. I like the idea of a pace car, I just don't like how it's done. So I wanna try to give Max's car nitro to make him the rabbit. I can live with Max being extremely fast because that's exactly how it is IRL also😄
 
So I did a bit of testing today and I'm no wiser then before😟

The plan was to do one race for every boost setting and see how it turns out.
But since boost is related to track position I thought that it wouldn't make sense to start last. So I went for mid pack on P11, for every race. I also used grid start.

First I took my N-One grid to Yas Marina. This was the boost off race, 5 laps.
I lost 4 positions at start. Had some good fights at the twisty sections, but on the straights the AI is just very slow. Took P1 at the end of the third. AI kept tailgating me but didn't attack. Not the best race, but I've had worse.

View attachment 1497888

Next I went to Mount Panorama for the boost weak race. 4 laps.
Again I lost a few positions at the start. I really have to work on my grid start😄
And then it happened: 4 laps of good, clean racing! Side by side up the mountain without any AI crashing into me!
And the pacing was really good also! I got P1 at the last lap up at the mountain.
And this brings us to the only downside of this race. AI is braking without any reason up at the mountain. Feels like they're brake checking you when you're close. That's the spot where I passed Max comfortably.
But this aside it was a really good race and pretty much what I'm looking for!

View attachment 1497889

Third test, boost strong, Spa, 4 laps
First corner was chaotic and I fell back to P16. But AI was slow just everywhere and I went up to P3 within the first lap. Nope, that's not what I want.
So I abandoned the race and went back to boost weak, hoping to repeat the experience from Mount Panorama. But nope. P2 at the end of first lap, P1 at the Kemmel straight on second lap.

View attachment 1497890

I have no idea what to make of this. It feels completely random, or at least strongly track dependent.

Tomorrow I will try something else. I like the idea of a pace car, I just don't like how it's done. So I wanna try to give Max's car nitro to make him the rabbit. I can live with Max being extremely fast because that's exactly how it is IRL also😄
Thanks for the testing and update! Glad you found a little fun along the way :)

AI won’t use nitro, fyi, but hopefully there are other ways for you to make him superior!

Regarding Mt. Panorama, are you on PS4 or 5? Since there is no other layout and I am on PS5, I have good races there vs. Sophy. No need (for me) to downtune there! I just won a 20-lapper (BAC Monos) by less than a second after doing one less pit stop! Sweating.. heh :P

I DO think that circuit is a pretty bad one for Reggy, due to the mountaintop brake checking, as you noted. I keep a ‘Reggy report card’ of sorts in my Integrale spreadsheet (signature), as a callout in case it’s helpful in determining your next tests. It’s hardly definitive, haha


IMG_7213.webp
 
BTW, I can CONFIRM that Sophy + Boost is more difficult with the update.

I did a few 5 lap races where, previously, I could podium from mid-pack. Now, I stay mid-pack. I need to try them without the boost to see what happens.

I will reiterate that Reggie sucks ;) - I tried a few Reggie races and that corner lunge thing annoys me. Not to mention that it still parks in the tight corners.
 
BTW, I can CONFIRM that Sophy + Boost is more difficult with the update.

I did a few 5 lap races where, previously, I could podium from mid-pack. Now, I stay mid-pack. I need to try them without the boost to see what happens.

I will reiterate that Reggie sucks ;) - I tried a few Reggie races and that corner lunge thing annoys me. Not to mention that it still parks in the tight corners.
What really ??
You mean with bost weak, i need to try that.

I tried without boost they are the same as before, increasingly slower as the race progresses.

Which is incomprehensible since the boost is supposed to be removed, but even with a car that's more powerful than mine, Sophy loses that competitive edge. (or horsepower)
You can see it clearly in a straight line;
When I get humiliated by a car, I keep it in mind, and on the last lap you can see that it has a much lower top speed than before.


On the other hand, I miss the divebombs from “sophy 3.0” when I'm in a custom race.
It's very frustrating.
 
Last edited:
What really ??
You mean with bost weak, i need to try that.
Yep, boost weak. I don't even bother without that. I'm doing custom races for the entertainment, not the wins.
On the other hand, I miss the divebombs from “sophy 3.0” when I'm in a custom race.
It's very frustrating.
OH, just you wait - Sophy + Weak dive bombs even better than the DLC imho. I don't know what they did, but it has a better judgement of trajectory.
 
BTW, I can CONFIRM that Sophy + Boost is more difficult with the update.

I did a few 5 lap races where, previously, I could podium from mid-pack. Now, I stay mid-pack. I need to try them without the boost to see what happens.

I will reiterate that Reggie sucks ;) - I tried a few Reggie races and that corner lunge thing annoys me. Not to mention that it still parks in the tight corners.
That's amazing!🙂

Now we just have to wait until she learns to drive all the cars and tracks and doesn't care about rain anymore😉
 
I feel like if they had updated Sophy 2.1 in any way, that they would have changed the version number.
Well, they kind of did.

the base game is already home to 2 different AI models (Reggie and Sophy) and the DLC adds a third? I don't think so. The DLC seems to only unlock "Sophy3.0" features, like the standing start. I HIGHLY doubt the game is selecting between 3 different AI models, that would be a code base nightmare.

Let's face it, we've all witnessed a change in Reggie, and there's no mention of that anywhere.
 
@Voodoovaj My dedicated testing is still limited, but I've done enough races over the years against Reggie. I feel like it's inconsistent, the performance varies from track to track and it may, in one form or the other, be influenced by the performance of the player.

It doesn't really feel like "Hey, it's Reggie, I know this guy so I have a good idea how the race will go". It feels more like "Oh, Reggie. He's a strange dude and you never know what mood he's in. He can give you a good fight but he can also just do a swift cruise and completely ignore you."

Maybe it's the same for Sophy?
 
It doesn't really feel like "Hey, it's Reggie, I know this guy so I have a good idea how the race will go". It feels more like "Oh, Reggie. He's a strange dude and you never know what mood he's in. He can give you a good fight but he can also just do a swift cruise and completely ignore you."

Maybe it's the same for Sophy?
I can't do Reggie races. I despise it. I only use it if I want to see the cars on a track that doesn't support Sophy.
 
I can't do Reggie races. I despise it. I only use it if I want to see the cars on a track that doesn't support Sophy.
You implied before that Sophy 2.1 may already be replaced by 3.0. What I was trying to say is, that those AI can feel very differently from race to race and from track to track. Reggie doesn't always feel the same, not by far. And I guess it could be the same for Sophy.
 
Last edited:
Well, they kind of did.

the base game is already home to 2 different AI models (Reggie and Sophy) and the DLC adds a third? I don't think so. The DLC seems to only unlock "Sophy3.0" features, like the standing start. I HIGHLY doubt the game is selecting between 3 different AI models, that would be a code base nightmare.

Let's face it, we've all witnessed a change in Reggie, and there's no mention of that anywhere.
Sophy 2.1 swerving to the right under the bridge at Suzuka, and Sophy 3.0 not doing that anymore tells me they're different.
 
Yes, they are different. 2.1 has some quirks, it usually doesn't handle certain road cars well (suspension is rough and they swerve aggressively) I haven't seen that in 3.0. However, race wise, 2.1 delivers a much better experience and it's not scripted like 3.0 is.
 
:scared:
@Voodoovaj My dedicated testing is still limited, but I've done enough races over the years against Reggie. I feel like it's inconsistent, the performance varies from track to track and it may, in one form or the other, be influenced by the performance of the player.

It doesn't really feel like "Hey, it's Reggie, I know this guy so I have a good idea how the race will go". It feels more like "Oh, Reggie. He's a strange dude and you never know what mood he's in. He can give you a good fight but he can also just do a swift cruise and completely ignore you."

Maybe it's the same for Sophy?
Yes indeed the programming varies from track to track. Also cars and car set up.:scared:

I do have sweet spots of competitive races. Some are just bad that I quit because I know the outcome.
As for SOPHY, I think I quit one or two races. It's most joy I have in this game. The only pain are when we get new cars. I love the PP cars so much, but I'm stuck with Reggie until SOPHY gets behind the digital wheel.

Edit: I'll just add, it's good we can all set up races how we play individually, and still achieve good outcomes for our own enjoyment.
 
Last edited:
Back