GT5 Latest News & Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter gamelle71
  • 76,879 comments
  • 10,278,628 views
What is the source on the whole "only 20 cars have Racing Mods"?
Please inform me.
Only 20 cars in the car list have the letters 'RM' beside them. RM may, and probably does, stand for racing modified. This means not that only 20 cars can have racing modification, but rather that 20 cars come from a dealership that way. It's likely the Concept by GT Dealership that we saw in GT5P as there are a few repeats.
 
Since when have dyno queens needed brakes? :lol:
You know people that modding supras in the right way doesnt always have upgrades that they actually need, thats why many of these cars are showcars, people have the money and they do what they are good at. On the other hand, why drive a stock lambo, if it gets killed by 450 hp civic
or by a Mitsubishi Evo at time attack?
 
LOL. So you can bash me for being disappointed but I can't point out you'd be happy if PD gave you GT4 with the 4 crossed out and a 5 in its place?

I'm trying really hard to understand this, but it's coming across as..

a-crying-baby.jpg
 
Regardless of whether that is all the final cars/tracks in the game, people who are saying things like

"I don't know what they've been doing for the last 6 years"

clearly don't have any idea the enormous task that modeling some of these cars and tracks is. People say in a rather blasé way

"why don't they make this car premium, then add these 6 tracks as well"

Seemingly under the impression that adding another track to a game (or even doing an HD update on an existing course) is far from the 5 minute project that they seem to present it as.

I'm not going to read the car list as it's pretty irrelevant to me. Id's like all cars to have cockpits but we've known they don't for a while now. Whether or not a Veyron has a cockpit doesn't bother me as this is not (as someone else said) "the real supercar simulator".

As long as the driving model is exceptional, that's what really matters. Whether this car or that car isn't in it (which will obviously always be the case as it can't have every car under the sun) comes a distant third, behind which tracks are there.
 
LOL. So you can bash me for being disappointed but I can't point out you'd be happy if PD gave you GT4 with the 4 crossed out and a 5 in its place?



B spec isn't new. Dynamic weather...........on a handful of tracks, yay. Tuning is nothing new. WRC stages yes, nascar yes. WHat else?

3D, photo mode, youtube uploading, top gear track, the special events are cool, track editor, endurance races. want more?
 
I'd like to wait to see the track/car lists on the official GT websites because, as it is now this is a very disappointing list and reinforces all my statements made here yesterday.

People who are happy with it I'm glad for you but you have to learn to be tolerant towards other peoples disappointment. And I like to consider myself as a fairly balanced guy and I think that anyone who want to analyse what we now at the moment about the game cannot be happy with it. And specialy those who call themselves "die hard fans", which is different of fanboys.

The spirit of GT has been since the beginning the the praise for car culture. No matter if we are talking about rallying, gt's, tuning, oval racing, so on... as long as it have an engine, 4 wheels and a motor, that was the point. And WAS seems to be key here...

Up to GT4, including, the encyclopedia of cars (as some like to refer to the game, when convenient...) had two major gaps: the absences of Ferrari and Porsche, maybe the two most iconic auto manufacturers in the automobile history.

With GT HD we had the happiness of getting the inclusion of one of them - Ferrari - and thus the expectation towards the first full game with the brand (GT5P was a DEMO, as also some also when convenient like to refer - specially in comparing the series with its major competitor...). After seeing the (supposedly) official car list and having in mind the "self-proclaimed" status of "car encyclopedia" / "more than a game" and, as told by the developers, "expecting perfection" one can only feel... sad.

I'm sorry but to not include cars as the 250GTO, the 250TR, or from more generic brands (so we don't get complaints about the excessive number of Ferraris... ) as the Ford Cortina Lotus, for example is not, at least to me, understandable...

As I've stated today this game, independently of the ground breaking features it has, does give the impression it has been rushed. It is like they spent 90% of the time producing those groundbreaking features and implementing them, creating breath-taking visuals, but spending so much time with it that near the end is like someone (Sony?) said to them: "Ok, that very nice but how many cars it'll have? At least 1000 for sure!?"

Someone said before (replying about the absence of the Jay Leno's Tank Car) that "this isn't GT4 2010 edition. It's GT5". I'm sorry but this IS GT4 HD 2010 edition with special features in it...

I tend to (or, naively want to) share Famine's (apparent) opinion that the track list may not be correct. I mean, the absence of tracks as Infineon, Motegi, and others is unbelievable. Specially those two considering the Nascar and Super GT association with the game.

I have the game pre-order (CE) and I will get it on the 24th and play the hell out of it. But honestly this isn't the game that was expected. And sure it isn't the game we have been hinted through the years we would get.
 
On the other hand, why drive a stock lambo, if it gets killed by 450 hp civic
or by a Mitsubishi Evo at time attack?

Because Lamborghini is a Lamborghini, yet still can be driven comfortably in city without fear for overheating, fried clutch or such, while still being able to do 200mph at will.
 
3D, photo mode, youtube uploading, top gear track, the special events are cool, track editor, endurance races. want more?

Photo mode is new? Endurance races are new? Track editor that is less than impressive? Special events look like driving missions and nothing more, top gear track is just another track. Yes, more would be nice, but you're wasting your time.
 
3D, photo mode, youtube uploading, top gear track, the special events are cool, track editor, endurance races. want more?

3D - Yes, but I can watch my TV in 3D..
Photo Mode - Nothing new
YouTube uploading - Nothing new, I have an iPod game that can do that
Top Gear Track - Nothing new, seen it on a PC game under a different name and as a Top Gear branded game
'The Special Events are Cool' - Not really a feature....
Track Editor - New for the GT series, yes, not new for the world
Endurance Races - *refers to GT4* Yep, those aren't new either..

Try harder :)
 
Because Lamborghini is a Lamborghini, yet still can be driven comfortably in city without fear for overheating, fried clutch or such, while still being able to do 200mph at will.

actuallty those supercars has overheating problems, and i like lambos ferraris too, aslong as they arnt original, i mean a twin turbo gallardo topping 250 mph at texas mile is nice.
 
Well, at this point, I'm just happy that we know the release date and can all stop wondering and speculating. And for those in the US, it's a welcome date since it falls right before Thanksgiving and many people will have an extended 4 day weekend to play (not me sadly).

As for the car list, well, I've never been thrilled about the premium/standard situation. I prefer to drive in cockpit view so it was disappointing. But it is what it is and we've known for a long time. And yes, there are certainly some cars I wish had made the cut, the Ferrari 355 Challenge and 1958 250 TR, among others. But with over 1,000 cars, there are so many to choose from, it really doesn't matter. Even if they included 2,000 or 3,000 cars, there would always be one model somebody would miss.

What I am very disappointed with is the track list. Frankly, considering PD has been working on GT5 for 5+ years, what we end up with is a bit of a joke. It's awful. My personal opinion was that the ONLY track worth driving in Prologue was Suzuka. Fuji was OK but it was a bit boring. HSR, London, Eiger, Daytona--all either uninspiring or poor tracks to actually race on. There are some great tracks in GT5 but I would love to have Spa and Hockenheim and Road Atlanta and Imola and Road America and Circuit Gilles Villeneuve. Or countless others. A lot of racing games out there on the PS3 that aren't any where near the quality of GT5 have much better track lists. And we won't even talk about the myriad of options for PC titles.

I guess I'm different than most people on this forum. I would have been happy with 200~250 premium cars but wish PD had spent the resources on a dozen more tracks. Inevitably, I find with most racing games, the more time you spend with them, you tend to gravitate toward a dozen or so cars that you really like. But you never get tired of driving different tracks. At least I don't. For me that's where the fun comes from. There's so much content in GT5, for the same $60 as other games, I would have no issue to pay for additional tracks through DLC. But I doubt it will ever be an option.

A bit of a mixed bag today I guess.
 
Oh no! Gran Turismo doesn't have my favorite car. Let me just CRY about it.
crying-baby-party-56800676.jpg


HURP DERP It's not really Gran Turismo 5. It's 4.
HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.

Everyone needs to stop complaining.

Seriously.
 
Guys you are always forgetting that make car or track for GT5 takes WAY MUCH MORE TIME than make it in GT4.Just look at details and precision.So PD definitely need to hide more employers!!!
 
I'd like to wait to see the track/car lists on the official GT websites because, as it is now this is a very disappointing list and reinforces all my statements made here yesterday.

People who are happy with it I'm glad for you but you have to learn to be tolerant towards other peoples disappointment. And I like to consider myself as a fairly balanced guy and I think that anyone who want to analyse what we now at the moment about the game cannot be happy with it. And specialy those who call themselves "die hard fans", which is different of fanboys.

The spirit of GT has been since the beginning the the praise for car culture. No matter if we are talking about rallying, gt's, tuning, oval racing, so on... as long as it have an engine, 4 wheels and a motor, that was the point. And WAS seems to be key here...

Up to GT4, including, the encyclopedia of cars (as some like to refer to the game, when convenient...) had two major gaps: the absences of Ferrari and Porsche, maybe the two most iconic auto manufacturers in the automobile history.

With GT HD we had the happiness of getting the inclusion of one of them - Ferrari - and thus the expectation towards the first full game with the brand (GT5P was a DEMO, as also some also when convenient like to refer - specially in comparing the series with its major competitor...). After seeing the (supposedly) official car list and having in mind the "self-proclaimed" status of "car encyclopedia" / "more than a game" and, as told by the developers, "expecting perfection" one can only feel... sad.

I'm sorry but to not include cars as the 250GTO, the 250TR, or from more generic brands (so we don't get complaints about the excessive number of Ferraris... ) as the Ford Cortina Lotus, for example is not, at least to me, understandable...

As I've stated today this game, independently of the ground breaking features it has, does give the impression it has been rushed. It is like they spent 90% of the time producing those groundbreaking features and implementing them, creating breath-taking visuals, but spending so much time with it that near the end is like someone (Sony?) said to them: "Ok, that very nice but how many cars it'll have? At least 1000 for sure!?"

Someone said before (replying about the absence of the Jay Leno's Tank Car) that "this isn't GT4 2010 edition. It's GT5". I'm sorry but this IS GT4 HD 2010 edition with special features in it...

I tend to (or, naively want to) share Famine's (apparent) opinion that the track list may not be correct. I mean, the absence of tracks as Infineon, Motegi, and others is unbelievable. Specially those two considering the Nascar and Super GT association with the game.

I have the game pre-order (CE) and I will get it on the 24th and play the hell out of it. But honestly this isn't the game that was expected. And sure it isn't the game we have been hinted through the years we would get.

👍👍👍👍
 
Kaz has stated so many things, that many car fans has become very confused, "build it, customize it, drive it" yeah sure. like i want to drive a 1000 hp supra or camaro with standard 17 inch wheels and no visual customization what so ever. And hey even more fun, you cant experience these beautiful cars interior, because the standard cars are just upscaled cars from gt4, just soPD can brag about their 1031 cars. But wait, only 200 have visual uppgrades and interior, and many iconic cars arnt even premium, jippie. Congratiulation Kaz you just dissapointed some vital customers.

I have concluded that your a Forza guy and they paid you to come in to cause drama. Out of all the post I have seen in this thread, you are the most negative towards GT5. If your so down on this game, why are you here. It sounds like your not going to buy the game so why demoralize everyone else. If you are a Forza fan you won't be for long. I bet you will at least play this game. But if you do, play it on a buddy's PS3 in which he has passed 80% of the game, then give your thoughts.
 
Track editor that is less than impressive?

lol i saw a track editor in an old game called Lotus turbo challenge 3, for the amiga, (and genesis i believe0

that had an editor that worked pretty much the same as this one.

it was a ****** way of creating bland tracks then, i dont think it will be any different now.

I mean look at modnation, there are a FEW good tracks made with that editor, the rest is characterless spam.

and that is with one of the best editors out there.

i wish they hadnt bothered with this editor and got the game out however long it took to do it, earlier.

i dont dislike the look of this game, i just feel its not worth 6 years development time.
 

Latest Posts

Back