GT5 Latest News & Discussion
- Thread starter gamelle71
- 76,879 comments
- 9,630,191 views
- 83
- Vic_Rattlehead
- 30,014
- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
Correct, but it's not as simple as that. While that is important to car manufacturers things like generally having their car mangled to a degree that could imply the driver or any passengers would be killed is also generally a no go. Most manufacturers will not allow the damage to extend to deformation or the chassis and sub-frame let alone encroach into the cabin.
Regarding people right to complain and pick at faults, they have a right because it's our money that Sony are asking for. On the flip side, you have a right to love the game and you both have a right to disagree with each other. Telling the other person regardless of which side it's coming from, that they don't have a right to like/dislike the game is whats wrong. You can have a good debate when you discuss pro's and cons in a civilised not so bitchy manner.
- 35,351
- Addison,Texas
- GTP_RACECAR
SrRd RacinG
(Banned)
- 2,948
- SrRd-RacinG
I went to BB again, (after waiting 3 days), and still no Gran Turismo 5. My heart is now scarred. I feel betrayed. *sighs*
I also tried Target but they have NO kiosks for ANY console. How rude!
When will I ever get to play this game before November 2nd?
I also tried Target but they have NO kiosks for ANY console. How rude!
When will I ever get to play this game before November 2nd?
- 680
- dissidentcook
Yeah, I'm right there with you when it comes to people who argue as if the game is going to be absolute crap, because this or that feature isn't proper (just looking for a fight), but then there are those that just want a feature to receive a more attention (perfectly fine).
I really couldn't give you any idea of common sense regarding PD's ability to simulate damage, as I am neither a computer scientist nor a 3D modeler, let alone a physicist. The trouble is, even if I was, I could not tell you what tricks PD has up its sleeve with respect to the various game engines, because I do not work there in such a capacity.
All we can really do is view what is thrown our way and personally judge the results as acceptable or not and variations thereof, etc. We can add as much supposition as we'd like, but it doesn't really do anyone any favors to upgrade conjecture to certainty or truth.
The trouble is that our perception of what is common sense is formed by a great many things (bigotry and delusions of grandeur included) and it is anyone's guess when it is more social than logical. I do understand what you are trying to get across with your example, I just don't see it as very logical, as we really don't know why the damage is as we've seen to date.
- 1,917
- Binance:TSIDDLSA
- patriotzero
- please no
- 680
- dissidentcook
Nice blowup, thanks!
- 706
No the car is trying to look at the gum on it's wheel.
- 3,668
- PNW
- cowabungacorey
I think it's burping
- 11,343
- Chicago, iLL
- GTP_Nismo
You gotta try different stores. I've tried a few stores and still only one has the demo.
- 5,003
- Val d'Orcia,Tuscany
- hardvibes
- ACR HardVibes
- 680
- dissidentcook
01GTP
Premium
- 3,345
- East Canaan, CT
- GTP_01GTP
Ah, stupid me, forgot about the mechanical.
Actually the mechanical would be good for endurance races and that kind of racing.
In GT4 I ran an WRS week (Ford GT @ HSR) so much I had to buy a new car because it had lost horsepower, that is great, I like that kind of ? damage.
I can run enough laps to stay of the walls (opponents, maybe) so impact damage I would rather not have at all.
Thanks for bringing that up.
- 680
- dissidentcook
Hahaha, good point. In my thoughts, I respected the idea of mechanical damage, but neglected the idea of wear in an endurance race.
The visual damage is interesting and I'm sure would be fun to play around with, but I also think that it might be useful as a good register of the damage done to your vehicle by some online punter.
Similar threads
