how would you rate gt3s gaphics?

  • Thread starter F1man
  • 22 comments
  • 551 views

how would you rate the graphics on gt3?

  • THEY ARE THE BEST D@MN GRAPHICS I HAVE SEEN!!

    Votes: 14 41.2%
  • very good!

    Votes: 16 47.1%
  • good

    Votes: 2 5.9%
  • not that good

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • it sucks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • very very bad!

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • cant deside!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    34
There D@mn good but not the best in the replay you can stil see some blocks and the audience sucks( there just photo's that move the you do......)
 
That game has some of the sickest replays, other racing games just have on the side of the track watching the car! The only game that would have better graphics is GTC.
 
Originally posted by gtfreak2
That game has some of the sickest replays, other racing games just have on the side of the track watching the car! The only game that would have better graphics is GTC.

Sickest? Do you mean slickest? Or have you found the hidden car crash simulator with extra blood and adjustable camera angles? :lol:
 
Apperently :gt:3 used almost all of the PS2's power to create the so they certainly are one of the Best?

If you Check out the GT4 web site :computer: I wrote about it See Signature In the main Text Section I think :smilewink
 
I find it more "impressive" than "striking". I knew that PS2 have such potential and GT3 is a great game to show PS2's graphics capabilities.

BTW, why did Polyphony rendered the R34 headlights and the RX-7 so ugly????

The BMW 3 looks so boxy too....
 
I find them quite impressive as well. When you first play GT3 it looks crystal clear, which it really is, but as time goes by and you keep playing the game it appears normal to you.

If anyone's got any doubts about GT3's graphics, go back and try GT2 for a race or two... Very different.
 
Back