If you can do this... You're a great drifter... I think

  • Thread starter Thread starter sejtur
  • 237 comments
  • 6,098 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
We're all in agreement here, but the FF crew seems to be confused.

We say: Yes, FF can drift, but it's very limited compared to other drivetrains, and is not ideal for drifting.

They say: FF can drift! We have proof!

We say (again): Yes, FF can drift, but again, it's not on the same level as FR, MR, or AWD.

Then they say: FF can drift! We'll prove it!


See what I'm getting at here?
 
Originally posted by battle_stage
We're all in agreement here, but the FF crew seems to be confused.

We say: Yes, FF can drift, but it's very limited compared to other drivetrains, and is not ideal for drifting.

They say: FF can drift! We have proof!

We say (again): Yes, FF can drift, but again, it's not on the same level as FR, MR, or AWD.

Then they say: FF can drift! We'll prove it!


See what I'm getting at here?

sigh

first off, im sure that a practised ff drifter could do VERY well against any of the RWD drifters on GTP in a GTPDC event. based on the judging standards, FF ALWAYS has plenty of smoke, HUGE angle, and if ur skilled then it could be very smooth.
I'm not part of any FF crew.
but i know for a fact the only thing keeping me from challenging you to a GTP drift comp is the fact i dont have the neccisary requirements to make a worthy video.
i know if i did, and i had about a week of practise, i could do VERY well against you in a fairly judged GTP drift competition. probly even win. i just wish i could show you. tsk tsk
 
I'm not talking about with e-brake. That's ***** ****. I'm sorry. Take off the training wheels and use real techniques. If anything the e-brake should be used for minor corrections once in a blue moon, not in 98% of every single turn you drift.
 
Originally posted by battle_stage
I'm not talking about with e-brake. That's ***** ****. I'm sorry. Take off the training wheels and use real techniques. If anything the e-brake should be used for minor corrections once in a blue moon, not in 98% of every single turn you drift.

hey i know it pisses you off but it dosent say anywhere in the rules for gtp drift comps that ur not allowed to use the e-brake, and the comps are not limited to any drivetrain, therefore i could probly woop ur a-hole in a comp that was judged without bias.
following the scoring system i could get more consistent smoke, higher angle, and equally controlled drifts ;)
hey im not trying to back up FF too much here in just trying to tell you not to mash on it...cuz it COULD school u.
 
Originally posted by battle_stage
With the e-brake! Don't you get it?

LOL yes with the e-brake!! haha dude i do get it but im telling you, ya cant step on sumthing thats bigger than you..
BTW im not referring to real life here at all so dont even start to talk about real life scenarios.
In GT3, u must accept that an FF drifter could pwn you, namely me, but thats just cuz this is all making me feel like proving a point.

E-brake or not id be following GTP comp rules. E-brake or not i could prolly outdrift you in an integra:D
 
Originally posted by battle_stage
We're all in agreement here, but the FF crew seems to be confused.

We say: Yes, FF can drift, but it's very limited compared to other drivetrains, and is not ideal for drifting.

They say: FF can drift! We have proof!

We say (again): Yes, FF can drift, but again, it's not on the same level as FR, MR, or AWD.

Then they say: FF can drift! We'll prove it!


See what I'm getting at here?

Because we aren't the same person. When people discuss FR it is not universal. So no I don't see what you're getting at. Also, this is not an FF crew, please don't refer to people in such a general sense. I will sum up what I want to say.
1. FF can Drift.
2. FF can hold its own to other drivetrains
3. FF sliding with ebrake is not drifting
4. FF Drift initiation with ebrake is drifting
5. FF Can be drifted without ebrake
 
Originally posted by F.Zamataki
hey i know it pisses you off but it dosent say anywhere in the rules for gtp drift comps that ur not allowed to use the e-brake, and the comps are not limited to any drivetrain, therefore i could probly woop ur a-hole in a comp that was judged without bias.
following the scoring system i could get more consistent smoke, higher angle, and equally controlled drifts ;)
hey im not trying to back up FF too much here in just trying to tell you not to mash on it...cuz it COULD school u.

Angle, smoke, style yes, but not control, because it's the control part that FF violates. I don't mean to get carried away here especially since we have gotten so far off topic, but if you want to know why I say that then feel free to ask. Personally, I'm for dropping this debate because it's obvious everyone involved has formed their opinions prior.
 
Originally posted by F.Zamataki
In GT3, u must accept that an FF drifter could pwn you, namely me, but thats just cuz this is all making me feel like proving a point.

E-brake or not id be following GTP comp rules. E-brake or not i could prolly outdrift you in an integra:D


Personally, when I judge GTP comps, I judge the different drivetrains in a different way based on their difficulty.

For example: Higher angled drifts are expected in 4wd cars simply because of the front wheel's ability to straighten the car at the end of a drift, so I don't give more points to a 4wd entry that is completely sideways in turn than a Rwd that is maxed out in it's angle to the point of almost spinning.

I would judge FF the same way. FF obviously produces more constant smoke since you're just holding the ebrake through the whole turn. I would judge that accordingly.

You also might lose big points for style because you're only using one technique in every corner.


-Mark
 
well i dont really ever drift FF, but i have, and every time i see that i can control the car and angle fine....i mean im not gonna go on because my lack of video producing equipment keeps me from proving you guys wrong....but maybe one day.
 
Originally posted by nightkids4ever
[size= 7]plz close the thread and lets don't forget what happen here or another person will get banned [/size]
ill just be quiet ok ?
 
Originally posted by Ethix101
Personally, when I judge GTP comps, I judge the different drivetrains in a different way based on their difficulty.

For example: Higher angled drifts are expected in 4wd cars simply because of the front wheel's ability to straighten the car at the end of a drift, so I don't give more points to a 4wd entry that is completely sideways in turn than a Rwd that is maxed out in it's angle to the point of almost spinning.

I would judge FF the same way. FF obviously produces more constant smoke since you're just holding the ebrake through the whole turn. I would judge that accordingly.

You also might lose big points for style because you're only using one technique in every corner.


-Mark

i could still use various techniques on corner entry, choku dori, etc etc.
i mean, hell if u think about it the same way RWD uses the throttle for powering through a corner all the time right? i mean, every time a rwd car drifts 80 percent of the time the rear wheels are spinnign right??
sooooo then, an ff has the same thing, except for 80 percent of the time the rear wheels are locked....its just its own technique, again, you cannot be biased.
 
The rear wheels are spinning to keep the car moving. It's a totally different idea.

If you can't see the difference between dragging the rear wheels through a corner and drifting, there's really no point in wasting our time arguing about it any further. We're not going to get anywhere.




-Mark
 
ahh but still, you say its not drifting but yet it actually is. ayeeeee this is getting nowhere.
as the rear wheels on a RWD are used to keep the car sliding and moving, in a FF car the ebrake is used to keep it sideways as the front wheels keep it moving.

you cannot quarrel over the fact that its drifting or not because it actually is.
like i stated before just because the rear wheels are locked dosent mean that its not drifting, please refer back to my long explanation earlier in this post for more reference as to why it dosent matter how you do it, but its that fact that your doing it. jeeebus:rolleyes:

you make with the different drivetrains and tools of the car to keep it sideways.
no matter what, as long as your using what is on the car to keep it sideways through a corner, and you are by definition causing the car to sustain the defined motion of "drifting", it counts.
i will not continue to explain this further, if you do not see the logic in this, then please refer to another body of information. *grief*
 
Originally posted by F.Zamataki
you cannot quarrel over the fact that its drifting or not because it actually is.

Another contradiction, you're on a role. Sorry, don't take it the wrong way, but I interpreted that as our position is wrong just because it's not your position.

like i stated before just because the rear wheels are locked dosent mean that its not drifting, please refer back to my long explanation earlier in this post for more reference as to why it dosent matter how you do it, but its that fact that your doing it. jeeebus:rolleyes:

The point is in FF you're upsetting the balance of the car just for show. In real drifting, it's still for show yes but balance is maintained. You can say FF looks balanced because it can simulate FR or AWD cars' motion, but if you truly believe that they're the same then you have much to learn about drifting. To drive an FF at its limits is to disrupt the balance. It's still fast, but not the same art. Drifting is about mastery of lateral weight transfer using throttle and brakes (and steering but for the most part steering is passive). This has no relation to speed, no relation to skill levels, nothing like that involved! There's nothing wrong with sliding an FF. All I'm saying is that drifting is something else. I wish you FF guys would stop saying we are dissing FF sliding, don't you think manipulative wording like that makes your argument suspect?
 
Originally posted by pergatory
Another contradiction, you're on a role. Sorry, don't take it the wrong way, but I interpreted that as our position is wrong just because it's not your position.



The point is in FF you're upsetting the balance of the car just for show. In real drifting, it's still for show yes but balance is maintained. You can say FF looks balanced because it can simulate FR or AWD cars' motion, but if you truly believe that they're the same then you have much to learn about drifting. To drive an FF at its limits is to disrupt the balance. It's still fast, but not the same art. Drifting is about mastery of lateral weight transfer using throttle and brakes (and steering but for the most part steering is passive). This has no relation to speed, no relation to skill levels, nothing like that involved! There's nothing wrong with sliding an FF. All I'm saying is that drifting is something else. I wish you FF guys would stop saying we are dissing FF sliding, don't you think manipulative wording like that makes your argument suspect?

Ok, now everyone please read that carefully before you make some cocky retort. There is nothing wrong with FF sliding, but it is not drifting.....Now can we please let this die? ;)
 
arrrggg i would let it die if you quit calling it "FF sliding".
why dont you see that the motorsport definition is different from the physical application of drifting.
i was just stating facts.
FF cars *by universal definition* CAN PERFORM THE PHYSICAL ACTION OF A DRIFT, people stated that they could not, i proved them wrong.

FF drifting in the area of motorsport drifting as an art form and or style, IS different, you cannot drift the same way as you can in a rwd, and rwd drifting is completely different, but now we are delving into the aspect of drifting we are all known to accept.
RWD is choice for drifting, and i never said it wasnt, i also never said that FF drifting was superior. i was never talking about how well an FF can drift over another drivetrain, i just said it was just as cabable in its own right. i was never talking about wich is better.
i was simply proving the unseen fact that FF drifting is a definite possibility.

so once again, to summarize:
1)FF drifting is possible in the physical and logical view of things.
2)However it is not ideal for drifting in the field of the sport we are involved in.

..thats what ive just been saying all along.

whatever you need to do to keep the car in the state of the defined drift counts, as long as it is only kept by what is built with the car. so ebrake or throttle, they are just different forms of keeping the car in the state of the defined drift (i keep repeating myself cuz its gotta get to ur skulls).
 
*sigh* We are not talking about Websters definition of drifting, as that has nothing to do with the motorsport. The term is not a literal translation from your dictionary. I am talking about the defininition of the Motorsport we call drifting. Now, in said sport, FF is not considered drifting, because it is so completely different than the other two drivetrains. You must control, a real drift, by utilizing weight transfer, braking, countersteer, and throttle control. If the rear wheels are not powered, and governing the direction of the drift, then you are not drifting, you are sliding....period.;)
 
Originally posted by F.Zamataki
arrrggg i would let it die if you quit calling it "FF sliding".

We would let it die if you would let us call it FF sliding, what's your point? This is a debate, there are two sides, that's the whole idea. I wanted to end this debate because it's obvious to me that those involved have already made up their minds, but it kept going so here we are debating, you have no right to complain.

Originally posted by F.Zamataki
FF cars *by universal definition* CAN PERFORM THE PHYSICAL ACTION OF A DRIFT, people stated that they could not, i proved them wrong.

Universal definition? Hahahah, you're kidding right? How can it be drifting by universal definition if it doesn't fit a single one of the definitions me or the other RWD guys have provided? Universal doesn't mean three people said so. You keep saying you proved us wrong but where is this proof? You've avoided every single one of our arguments and simply keep saying the same thing over and over. Every time, I get more impatient, and try to state it in a different way, a more aggressive way, hoping to encourage you into an intelligent debate. All you do, is keep saying the same thing over and over. "Yes it is drifting because I say so! Stop saying it's not drifting because I already said it was!" If you're going to argue it, you have to at least address our points.
 
I'm uploading the proof right now. I will prove that FF can drift, and that I can match an FR's performance with ZERO FF experience. Then I will continue to speak of the FF's inferiority.

Just cause you can ride with the big boys with your training wheels on doesn't mean you can really ride a bike. Sure you can ride for a few seconds without them on, but that doesn't mean you can ride better than the bigger kids. Take off the training wheels, then we'll talk.
 
Originally posted by battle_stage
Here's the "proof".

http://gwinbeer.com/drifting/vids/FF_RSX-S.WMV

The car is conpletely stock using sim tires. Some of the turns had no e-brake at all. Other's only used e-brake to help exit, and others used e-brake all the way through. The first S just before Start line had NO e-brake at all.

For clarification.. what exactly are you proving? The argument is not over whether an FF can break traction.
 
Originally posted by pergatory
For clarification.. what exactly are you proving? The argument is not over whether an FF can break traction.

Now that I think about it, that seems to be the entire argument, except that myself and silviadrifter are arguing something completely different that nobody seems willing to respond to. Well I guess I'll bow out of this conversation until I see some direct responses about my assertions that FF sliding is unbalanced and uncontrolled.
 
Originally posted by battle_stage
Here's the "proof".

http://gwinbeer.com/drifting/vids/FF_RSX-S.WMV

The car is conpletely stock using sim tires. Some of the turns had no e-brake at all. Other's only used e-brake to help exit, and others used e-brake all the way through. The first S just before Start line had NO e-brake at all.

That is not proof, you uploaded the vid. That is like a murderer being responsible for coming up with all the proof for the plaintiff.. wtf?
 
Originally posted by pergatory
We would let it die if you would let us call it FF sliding, what's your point? This is a debate, there are two sides, that's the whole idea. I wanted to end this debate because it's obvious to me that those involved have already made up their minds, but it kept going so here we are debating, you have no right to complain.



Universal definition? Hahahah, you're kidding right? How can it be drifting by universal definition if it doesn't fit a single one of the definitions me or the other RWD guys have provided? Universal doesn't mean three people said so. You keep saying you proved us wrong but where is this proof? You've avoided every single one of our arguments and simply keep saying the same thing over and over. Every time, I get more impatient, and try to state it in a different way, a more aggressive way, hoping to encourage you into an intelligent debate. All you do, is keep saying the same thing over and over. "Yes it is drifting because I say so! Stop saying it's not drifting because I already said it was!" If you're going to argue it, you have to at least address our points.

u must be broken.
IN GT3, you are capable of drifting, and controlling a drift in a FWD vehicle no matter what.
ahhh, i said it before, and READ THIS CLOSELY, AND THINK!!

***** whatever you need to do to keep the car in the state of the defined drift counts, as long as it is only kept by what is built with the car. so ebrake or throttle, they are just different forms of keeping the car in the state of the defined drift*****

THAT counts. in GT3 it is completely possible to hold a FWD car in a drift using its built-in mechanisms.
you guys still seem to think that the only way it can be called drifting is if the rear wheels are pushing the car sideways yet maybe take CLOSE READ AT THIS...

***a rear wheel drive car uses the pushing power of the rear wheels to maintain a drift angle, thus keeping the car moving and drifting at the same time. YET this car is also USING ONLY THE COMPONENTS ON THE CAR ITSELF to maintain that drift. IT IS USING ITS REAR WHEEL POWER TO FORCE IT SIDEWAYS THROUGH A CORNER. and you call this drifting.

but in the same rate, a front wheel drive car is using its e-brake in the same manner as a rear wheel drive car is using its rear wheel power.
and is using the front wheels to pull it through.
the e-brake is a built in mechanism(just like a differential is in a rwd) and is part of the car itself!!!

so what do they have in common you ask???
BOTH CARS ARE USING WHATEVER MEANS THEY HAVE BUILT ONTO THEM TO KEEP THE CAR IN A DRIFTING STATE!!!
it does not matter how you drift, as long as you provide the action.

thusly a rear wheel drive car can "move sideways" (drift) through apricot hill half circle....
a front wheel drive car can DO THE EXACT SAME THING!!
IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW!!
IT IS USING WHAT IT HAS TO HOLD A DRIFT THE SAME WAY AS A REAR WHEEL DRIVE USES WHAT IT HAS TO DRIFT.

i really hope thats clear enough, cuz if its not, then i fear that you people dont have a sense of logic and basic understanding of the principle of this whole topic.

[EDIT] please refer to this video to see the FF car in the action of a drift.
its doing exactly what a rwd car would do, just in a different way:D P.S. it has been compressed so ignore the first few responses in reference to the size of the vid.

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/show...&perpage=20&highlight=f.zamataki&pagenumber=1
 
What you said makes sense, but e-brake is still for pussies.

So cars have cigarette lighters and that's a pre-built mechanism, does that make the car a zippo?
 
[EDIT] please refer to this video to see the FF car in the action of a drift.
its doing exactly what a rwd car would do, just in a different way P.S. it has been compressed so ignore the first few responses in reference to the size of the vid.

Your vid is long gone son, plus it's massive. Just refer to mine, same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back