Originally posted by ExigeExcel
i have played some games, cant remember which, but they have photo pictures in the background to show the cities or country side. Now thats great, just the fact they then have low quality in game pics, these make the game look cheap and shoddy and no1 bothers with it.
in terms of making a game photorealistic its a long way off. Its one thing to scan david beckhams face into a footy game, but to get full 360 degree pics of a car and make it look right while it moves in game is alot harder. Also no matter how good graphics get, would you really want completely photo realistic graphics? face it, us gamers get enough stick off people saying the games we play insight violence, street racing and GTA (no not the game), all we need is a photo realistic game where some1 really takes it serious and forgets its a game.
anyway before we have photo realistic cars, i'd rather see abit of damage on them.
..... anyways about the graphics just let people have there opinion.. if you dont put it to rest you people will b*tch til the end of time on if its photorealistic or just plain realistic.. just let it goooooo... The graphics are going to be amazing yes so lets end it at that.. if you want photorealistic just watch a real race take a few pictures and stare at thoese then you'll get your photorealistic shots... but all in all we know the graphics will be better than GT3 and GT3 had great graphics so why bother b*tching about something like this I dont know but maybe just maybe you guys have to much time on your hands..
