- 1,062
4 days of August left..
Not long now.
Though I am equally as interested to see if they will announce more to come after this.
Not long now.
Though I am equally as interested to see if they will announce more to come after this.
Did any other sim ever include Fiorano as a playable track?
I guess time will tell, but I'm still unconvinced that private test tracks that run few real life road races (bikes don't count!) are the best way forward for the track list. Leipzig seems massively underused online, and that's a pretty fair indication of how well the track suits the players for road racing. Yet here come another two.
Plus, so little US representation in the track list. VIR, Sebring, Mid-Ohio all screaming out for inclusion, perfect for road racing and Indy, multi-class etc.. I wonder how SMS prioritize their track selection?
I can understand where you're coming from here completely. I'd much rather have had another German track that's used for racing like the Sachsenring instead of a test track or Misano instead of Fiorano. I think 2 test tracks is enough. You have the prestige of having the official test tracks used by Ferrari and Porsche and those who want to drive it, will drive it as a test track in most instances.I guess time will tell, but I'm still unconvinced that private test tracks that run few real life road races (bikes don't count!) are the best way forward for the track list. Leipzig seems massively underused online, and that's a pretty fair indication of how well the track suits the players for road racing. Yet here come another two.
As an IndyCar and IMSA fan, definitely on the American tracks. There are a lot of ovals that would add some more variety to that. We don't have a short oval like Phoenix/Richmond or a wide-open Superspeedway which suits IndyCar like Fontana/Pocono.Plus, so little US representation in the track list. VIR, Sebring, Mid-Ohio all screaming out for inclusion, perfect for road racing and Indy, multi-class etc.. I wonder how SMS prioritize their track selection?
I guess time will tell, but I'm still unconvinced that private test tracks that run few real life road races (bikes don't count!) are the best way forward for the track list. Leipzig seems massively underused online, and that's a pretty fair indication of how well the track suits the players for road racing. Yet here come another two.
Plus, so little US representation in the track list. VIR, Sebring, Mid-Ohio all screaming out for inclusion, perfect for road racing and Indy, multi-class etc.. I wonder how SMS prioritize their track selection?
What he said (that I remember) was that he said it was a boring track. If you exclude the history and the bumps and just judge it on track layout alone, I'd tend to agree.To the bolded: apparently Ian Bell hates that track, so the chances of it coming into an SMS game are slim. Which says a lot about Ian Bell and his priorities, to be honest. One of the most historically significant tracks in North America not coming in because of petty reasons.
What he said (that I remember) was that he said it was a boring track. If you exclude the history and the bumps and just judge it on track layout alone, I'd tend to agree.
Exactly. He just doesn't understand why people want it so much was my understanding from it.I don't think Ian Bell has personally decided Sebring shouldn't be included based on his own opinions of the circuit
Sebring presents a huge challenge to model well (and not display the worst aspects of the suspension and physics models) because of the huge variation in track surface. And presents an immense challenge to the tuner to set up well for the worst sections without compromising the smoother.
All due deference to Mr Bell and his 🤬 opinions (ha!), but the vast majority of world drivers have a completely different opinion about Sebring, and the list of greats who have participated and sometimes won there and seemed happy about it is something I'd take over his opinion any day!
Personally, I am more of the opinion that Mr Bell realizes the flaws that might be exposed in his physics and suspension models by the track, and is simply using a flimsy excuse to not include it. We have all seen how badly Daytona can pogo cars around given less than perfect net settings.
Join the club. I had thought he turned a corner and we might have some interesting conversation...And that is where you lose me. You were doing so well but I think you insist on being a controversial poster. Always looking to stir something up.
I find Azure exactly as Monaco, same corners, same city, I do not know why they do not call it Monaco, the name was expensive?, unlike Sakitto that is different from Suzuka, have some corners that are almost the same, but almost everything is different.
I doubt they're going to throw more tracks in the future, I just hope that they keep their promise about Interlagos.
I find Azure exactly as Monaco, same corners, same city, I do not know why they do not call it Monaco, the name was expensive?, unlike Sakitto that is different from Suzuka, have some corners that are almost the same, but almost everything is different.
I doubt they're going to throw more tracks in the future, I just hope that they keep their promise about Interlagos.
And me, I'm just looking forward to taking those 8 Italian bad boys around Mugello, and everywhere else!
Hopefully it don't keep stuck on his way an we see the DLC tomorrow....Thanks @Donnced. I always wondered how DLC is being distributed behind the scenes.
Hopefully it don't keep stuck on his way an we see the DLC tomorrow....
I just taken a look at the new Zealand and Australian Playstation stores and nothing there yet in the "future"