Novalee
(Banned)
- 708
- Earth
Well for zero sales figures they sure raking it in .Fortnite is free so it's sales figure is a big fat 0
Well for zero sales figures they sure raking it in .Fortnite is free so it's sales figure is a big fat 0
Well for zero sales figures they sure raking it in .
Tell me a AAA game that was selling for 1/3 of its price new at most retailers 3 months after launch...
Fallout 76?
I was literally just answering the question there was no need for you to be all snarky afterwards lol
I was just being honest, Fallout 76 may be the worst AAA title ever
I was just being honest, Fallout 76 may be the worst AAA title ever
Ahhhh okay sorry read your reply completely wrong ignore me
Fallout 76, based on virtually every review aggregate out there, is an awful game. So it makes sense that it was on sale only 3 months after its launch.
GT Sport, on those very same aggregate sites, has considerably better reviews. Not a “grand slam,” but overall a good game, again, judging purely by reviews. Yet, it also was on sale only 3 months after launch.
Clearly, this is a terrible metric by which to judge a game, especially a game that’s backed by a platform developer that won’t live or die by units sold.
So honestly, your entire position is nonsense.
In the first week GTS sold nearly 1 milion copies what are you talking about...and ok the game dropped in price pretty fast but that helped the game to keep the momentum,there are other games that can't sell even after the price drop...So judging a games sales by the low price it was being sold at 3 months after launch is nonsense? Really? Do you actually believe GTS sold a lot before that? I'll put my left nut on that 5% of sales were made in the first 3 months and since it was on sale on the PS Store about 2-3% paid full price for it.
Review aggregates aren't any way to judge a game either, I'd sooner judge them by facts like PS trophies which give a clear indication of what percentage of players have actually played a game (in GT Sport's case its 13% that have driven only 2500 miles) a pathetic statistic, no?
So you were saying something about nonsense....
Review aggregates aren't any way to judge a game either
In the first week GTS sold nearly 1 milion copies what are you talking about...and ok the game dropped in price pretty fast but that helped the game to keep the momentum,there are other games that can't sell even after the price drop...
In what universe are user scores and video game reviews not a good metric for game quality?
At this point, you’re making delusional statements to bolster your argument, and it’s sad you can’t tell.
PC2 doesn't fare much better, at least on PS4. Only 22% have completed 1 career season. Iirc the first season can be completed by driving a total of 9 laps.(in GT Sport's case its 13% that have driven only 2500 miles)
PC2 doesn't fare much better, at least on PS4. Only 22% have completed 1 career season. Iirc the first season can be completed by driving a total of 9 laps.
http://www.vgchartz.com/article/270...-estimated-982000-units-first-week-at-retail/It was also bundled with consoles in the run up to Xmas 2017. And can you post a link to that 1m figure?
The 11% that have completed one online race?Well I'd guess that number would be boosted quite a lot if it included online players.
It's more likely that those stats would be similar across all platforms.Seriously though PC2 is multi platform its stats will be way higher anyway.
User scores on the Internet
Yeah I'll stick to the actual facts that 13% of players to this day haven't even bothered to do 2500 miles in an over year and a half old game
The 11% that have completed one online race?
It's more likely that those stats would be similar across all platforms.
And only 8% of GT5 players drove 7900 miles!! And that game has been out for a decade!
Dude, know when to throw in the towel, lol...
And you're still defending this series when others are way ahead
You were talking about a towel?
Thanks.Renault Clio Sport V6 '00
Toyota Sports 800 '65
Chevrolet Camaro Z28 '69
Toyota Tundra TRD '19
That’s my whole position though, bro. Every single argument you’ve resorted to, I’ve so easily debunked by facts that take me about 5 minutes to research.
The amount I care about you not liking GT Sport is infinitely approaching zero. But anything other than constructive criticism is just “blathering on,” which is what I accused you of doing about 5 hours ago, and you won’t stop.
So, I’m blessed with the opportunity to make you look dumber and dumber by the moment, and I quite like doing it.
Boosted by online only players? Only 11% have completed even one online race. I think it's safe to assume far fewer have reached 10 online races. Those types of figures aren't gonna provide much of a boost.You said 22% had completed a career season, I said that would be boosted by the online only players in terms of playing PC2. Idk what you're trying to say, it still considerably more that GTS
And finally if you don't care about my opinion then stop replying with your nonsense
Boosted by online only players? Only 11% have completed even one online race. I think it's safe to assume far fewer have reached 10 online races. Those types of figures aren't gonna provide much of a boost.
It's normal for sim racing games to have those types of figures. They require a bit of dedication to get past the initial learning curve. Many give up early and move on. Only 37% have driven 300km in AC (PS4).
To reiterate, I do not care about your opinion. I care about the statements you are using to bolster it.
Let’s recap; Trophy data is not on your side. Market data, is not on your side. Sales figures, also, not on your side.
If you do not like this game, that’s fine. But GT Sport is a success in every measurable way, both compared to previous franchise entries and also the racing genre itself. So if you want to critique something about it, critique it in valid, subjective ways. Heck, maybe some people will even agree with you.
Not saying that you should love this game or don't critisize this gane or anything.
But if the only and only thing you say here in this subforum is negative (while at the same time "defending" or always adoring other series in respective subforum) then I have a right to be suspicious about said person.
I'm tired replying directly so just enjoy this reply that's still relevant even >4 years later.
Now stop this very off topic thing, please.
Oh ok now i understand, better to ignore himNot saying that you should love this game or don't critisize this gane or anything.
But if and only if the only thing you say here in this subforum is negative (while at the same time "defending" or always adoring other series in respective subforum) then I have a right to be suspicious about said person.
I'm tired replying directly so just enjoy this reply that's still relevant even >4 years later.
Now stop this very off topic thing, please.