- 9,058
- Murica
- BasedAckbar
This thread cannot have enough of my likes.
^Sounds like one of these funny farm-games.
New track? Paid DLC, I assume?
Suddenly I'm not that excited anymore.
I would prefer PD to focus on reintroducing the features that were in GT5 and promised for GT6 before paid DLC start appearing.
Always negativity somewhere.I would prefer PD to focus on reintroducing the features that were in GT5 and promised for GT6 before paid DLC start appearing.
You were talking about paying for a track. Not for the course maker. If it is a track and not a course maker location (which, like you said is promised and most likely will be free) and it drives like it looks I'd paid twice.I would prefer PD to focus on reintroducing the features that were in GT5 and promised for GT6 before paid DLC start appearing.
I would prefer PD to focus on reintroducing the features that were in GT5 and promised for GT6 before paid DLC start appearing.
No, a beautiful track to drive some of the best cars in the world on.New track with the same sorry AI in the most haphazard grid of vehicles imaginable? Oh, with no option for tire wear or fuel use?
Jesus Christ dude, that's sad.This is the statement I was looking for.
No, a beautiful track to drive some of the best cars in the world on.
Jesus Christ dude, that's sad.
What if instead of modeling new paid DLC content, they added weather/time change for existing tracks that don't have it yet, improve old-gen tracks (Cote D'Azur...), or converted more Standard cars to Premium or "semi-Premium", for example?Because modelling a track slows down programming *EVERYTHING* else right?
I would much rather have the great fantasy tracks form GT1+2 over the introduction of any new real world tracks.I hope it's not just a DLC track, I was hoping for real world tracks for DLC.
In that case, they wouldn't earn money. And we all know how much they need money to create stuff like that you suggested.What if instead of modeling new paid DLC content, they added weather/time change for existing tracks that don't have it yet, improve old-gen tracks (Cote D'Azur...), or converted more Standard cars to Premium or "semi-Premium", for example?
The game hasn't even been out for two months, offering paid DLC now (and what's more, supposedly one made/based of a Course Maker creation) would be pretty much like offering day-one paid DLC. I won't support such practice, given the state the game was released and bait-n-switch tactics I feel I was lured into getting it early at full price.
The members of the Kaz defenders' club could go buy 10 more copies of GT6 if they really feel that loyal to PD/Sony.
What if instead of modeling new paid DLC content, they added weather/time change for existing tracks that don't have it yet, improve old-gen tracks (Cote D'Azur...), or converted more Standard cars to Premium or "semi-Premium", for example?
Must wait 3 more days ...... I can't wait that long damn it.
Looks amazing! I don't care if its paid DLC because im not a peasant.
New content is always great, especially with what is likely to be a very large track. If there is sufficient corners and its narrow enough then it may even keep the drift forum happy... for a few minutes
Looks like fun though.
In that case, they wouldn't earn money. And we all know how much they need money to create stuff like that you suggested.![]()
I remember this racing game that was "buggy, glitchy, had input lag, icy physics" and was released as a half-assed game to the public, yet it got away by releasing DLC even though it STILL had the problems it had from the very beginning. I remember this other racing game that was also released half finished, taking every feature and content out and yet again that one get's away by releasing DLC (along with old content) without even finishing the game.So only poor people should be concerned with whether a new track is paid DLC when they have much more serious things to fix in GT6, like maybe getting the game to where it should be and out of this beta development they have us all doing for them.![]()
Let's start another countdown thread
![]()
I remember this racing game that was "buggy, glitchy, had input lag, icy physics" and was released as a half-assed game to the public, yet it got away by releasing DLC even though it STILL had the problems it had from the very beginning. I remember this other racing game that was also released half finished, taking every feature and content out and yet again that one get's away by releasing DLC (along with old content) without even finishing the game.
I don't understand. Why does those devs not get the same crap PD get's, but instead, they get away with doing this to people? Why?