The Acura Integra is coming back in 2022!

  • Thread starter GTFan24
  • 260 comments
  • 32,737 views
I feel like this new Integra is really just the new ILX, or maybe the sportier and 5 doors version of the ILX.
It's seems more like that way to me too, they just took the same car and gave it a familiar name. Like Ford taking the Five Hundred during its facelift and calling it the Taurus.

---
As others said, the good thing to come out of this is at least Acura is going back to a normal name with this car rather than just letters.
 
As others said, the good thing to come out of this is at least Acura is going back to a normal name with this car rather than just letters.
Well Acura has been using letters for a while. Other than Integra, there's Legend and Vigor and that's pretty much it. Don't think they ever had a SUV with a name.
 
You do realize that the Integra sedan existed and sold quite well.
Yes, but when I think of the Integra, I'm thinking of the coupe. More specifically, the 3rd gen coupe. Also, the RSX (which obviously replaced the Integra) was never sold as a sedan. Acura should have made it clear from the beginning.
 
New Integra looks derivative, which cancels things out.

(but I'm holding out for coupe, too)
 
Last edited:
Yes, but when I think of the Integra, I'm thinking of the coupe. More specifically, the 3rd gen coupe. Also, the RSX (which obviously replaced the Integra) was never sold as a sedan. Acura should have made it clear from the beginning.
And the RSX doesn't exist anymore, because selling a coupe-only platform is not a smart financial decision. Case in point, the Civic which primarily sells as a sedan and is profitable enough to fund a niche coupe. If I remember correctly, Integra sedans used to be extremely common and sold in high numbers. It helped spread the cost of the shared platforms across more market segments.
 
And the RSX doesn't exist anymore, because selling a coupe-only platform is not a smart financial decision. Case in point, the Civic which primarily sells as a sedan and is profitable enough to fund a niche coupe. If I remember correctly, Integra sedans used to be extremely common and sold in high numbers. It helped spread the cost of the shared platforms across more market segments.
Sure, but anyone want another ZDX?

This is Gran Turismo forum, and I'm going full fanboy for an Integra coupe, because I can actually afford one now (unlike the ersatz Countach).
 
Last edited:
Sure, but anyone want another ZDX?
I personally would love to own a ZDX and I'm glad you mentioned it because I think it would make a neat daily driver. What a striking design and interesting package.
 
I personally would love to own a ZDX and I'm glad you mentioned it because I think it would make a neat daily driver. What a striking design and interesting package.
It's like a Saabacura, so I have no right to veto your decision.

(Saacura? ZaadX? Craastour?)
 
Last edited:
I personally would love to own a ZDX and I'm glad you mentioned it because I think it would make a neat daily driver. What a striking design and interesting package.
I love it.

Then again, I would unironically daily a Murano CrossCabriolet if given the chance so...
 
And the RSX doesn't exist anymore, because selling a coupe-only platform is not a smart financial decision.
And the Integra liftback has been dead since 1989. I know that coupe are not selling well anymore, but I don't think it's a wise decision from Acura to tease it without mentioning at first that it wouldn't be a coupe.
 
It's like a Saabacura, so I have no right to veto your decision.
And apparently they're still quite expensive for some reason. Autotrader has then priced at around $20k with around 100k miles which seems unusual for luxury brands, especially cars that didn't sell well. I had assumed these would've hit rock bottom right now. They're as expensive as a G37 S coupe which is still genuinely in-demand. Good news is that the ZDX's infotainment is easily upgradeable to Carplay and Android Auto without actually replacing the factory system.

And the Integra liftback has been dead since 1989. I know that coupe are not selling well anymore, but I don't think it's a wise decision from Acura to tease it without mentioning at first that it wouldn't be a coupe.
We don't know that there won't be a coupe. My point was that offering both a sedan and a coupe is the better financial decision. As for liftbacks/fastbacks, for the longest time the American market had no appetite for hatchbacks but the "coupe sedan" marketing machine combined with transition to SUVs seems to have solved that. Plus the fact that all sedans will be liftbacks or fastbacks - Kammbacks - in the future due to aerodynamic efficiency requirements. Ultimately I think it will prove to be a good thing that they're offering a sedan because otherwise it wouldn't make financial sense to only sell the coupe. Many other luxury manufacturers do this - Infiniti Q50/Q60, BMW 3/4, Mercedes C and CLS, Audi A5, etc.
 
Last edited:
I personally would love to own a ZDX and I'm glad you mentioned it because I think it would make a neat daily driver. What a striking design and interesting package.
Fun fact, Acura sold more NSXs than ZDXs in North America.

It's just a Pilot in fancy clothes with a useless backseat for anyone over 5 feet tall.
 
I understand why everyone are disappointed here but i'm not sure why everyone immediately expected this new Integra to be some sort of a modern day, high performance hot hatch a.k.a the return of the Type R Integra/RSX.

I get that's how car enthusiasts remember the Integra in the first place but i think people forgot that the Integra for the most part was just a glorified Civic that just so happens to receive a more fun sporty model like countless other cars.

1633350099433.png

1633350376305.png


Again i get why people are disappointed and upset but i thought i would just remind everyone about it.
 
Last edited:
Because if Honda was going to go through the trouble of bringing back the Integra name after fifteen+ years of attempting to run Acura into the ground with various alphabet-soup-named Buick wannabes, there is no reason to think that they were going to do so with an Integra LS; and everyone probably assumes they don't want a repeat of the disaster that the CR-Z was and/or aren't as cynical as Mitsubishi or Ford.








There's a specific connotation to the Integra name, and twenty years after Honda deliberately killed it in the US while it was on top that meaning isn't 4 speed slushbox sedans; and Honda damn well knows it too. It's not an accident that they trot out the (old) NSX or the ITR for their current commercials where they try and sell you a generic crossover SUV.
 
Last edited:
I understand why everyone are disappointed here but i'm not sure why everyone immediately expected this new Integra to be some sort of a modern day, high performance hot hatch a.k.a the return of the Type R Integra/RSX.

I get that's how car enthusiasts remember the Integra in the first place but i think people forgot that the Integra for the most part was just a glorified Civic that just so happens to receive a more fun sporty model like countless other cars.

View attachment 1084133
View attachment 1084134

Again i get why people are disappointed and upset but i thought i would just remind everyone about it.
I had an Integra LS with a B18B. The non-Vtec models didn't have the same fireworks, but they were still great. The B18B had a pretty solid torque curve, and the best bits about the great Hondas were all there - double wishbone suspension, great chassis tuning, fantastic ergonomics, great shifter feel, great visibility. I also had a tuned B16A (170hp, Vtec) powered 1994 Civic coupe. Very similar to the Integra. It was marginally more exciting, but honestly didn't feel much faster despite the extra 30+hp and I wouldn't say it was a necessarily better car. Even a D15 powered EG Civic hatchback was fun to throw around, although they were truly, despairingly slow.

Ultimately, for me, the engines alone did not a great Honda make...or something. I'm not sure where I'm going with this exactly, other than to say that the two cars you posted were probably great to drive (unless they were autos...) even if they weren't the "special" ones, in a way that can't really be said for most 1990s econoboxes - that's the Honda/Acura difference, the Vtec engines were just extra sauce. I think what's missed with all the Type R nostalgia is that there was a time when everything Acura and Honda made was actually really fun & engaging to drive. That's the Honda & Acura I miss...not the outright performance - lets face it, an Integra Type R wasn't really that fast even in it's day.
 
From the first Integra RS & LS, they had good handling and ergonomics. Honda reliability and that's it. The cars felt upmarket as they were well put together. Those of course, as we all know, sold more than the later Type-R models. It's going to be base cars, before performance models, for Honda/Acura.
 
Back