The Thrustmaster T500RS Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomN
  • 9,925 comments
  • 2,270,159 views
Not saying it won't. But because the situation seems to be arising that a game brand endorces a specific wheel. This wheel in future may not work with another game which endources brand x

See where were heading.

You are REALLY going to far with your assumptions.

First, all PC/PS3 wheels are WORKING crossplatform-wise because they all use the same HID-controller technology. All my wheels (and I had both Thrustmaster, Logitech and now Fanatec models) are cross-platform. Only non-cross -latform wheels are those Frex/ISSI/Momo ones which are being custom-made for PC with custom ID-controllers. And Xbox/X360 wheels of course.

Second, all PC/PS3 WHEELS WORKS in all games, but some SPECIAL FUNCTIONS may be not supported (and only one I know is the RA Adjust on G27 at this point).

Third, since T500RS is an PlayStation Official Product, it will work an all PS games onwards and probably backwards - because it utilize the same HID technology as all other wheels onthe market.

Fourth, we already know that T50RS will not work with PC in first days, but full PC drivers are being prepared as we speak.

Gilles Raulet
- PC driver will come later in 2011

And fifth, lack of full G27 support has to do with Logitech, not PD. Truth is not always welcomed, but that is how it is.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=24399741&postcount=3560
 
So I can't put my wipers on thanks to Logitech.

I see PD were savvy enough to allow the wheel to actually work though.
That link was about paddles they seem to have sorted that out.

Anyway I'm outta here.
Have fun.
 
My G25 works fine except I want to be able to adjust from 900 degrees down to around 300 degrees when I run the X2010 or short tracks with lots of curves. Since I gave away my DF Pro, with it's 900-200 switch, I had to use my old EX to win the Vettel Challenge. Anyone see a spec on how few degrees the T500 adjusts down to?

As far as Kaz making money on wheel deals, he must have borrowed a lot of money to get GT5 to market. $60 for GT5 is a steal. Far and away my favorite game ever. If I have to pay extra to get a really good wheel for it I don't have a problem with that.
 
Discussion of such should not be a topic in this thread but it does seem some Logitech G25/G27 owners because of the situation and their irration have a reason to dis this product. Thrustmaster deserve the benefit of the doubt and for the product to be fairly tested/compared to see if it meets its high price with performance.

We are never going to know the full issues regards wheels. We have to remember that Polphony Digital is a susidiary of Sony. Thats a unique difference and maybe that makes things more complicated than say it being a Codemasters title or other developer.

The point is it would be very easy as developers for them to of had a G25, G27 screen within the game and each wheel fully featured. Understandably this annoys people. However it is, the way it is for a reason rather than them not being bothered or interested. As I pointed out it may be to do with those items not being PS3 licensced products and Sony losing out.

Let me put it to you that perhaps Sony or PD wanted paid/money/royalties from Logitech as many thousands of people have purchased those products to the benefit of Logitech and not Sony or PD to play GT5.

At the same point why should Thrustmaster then have to "Pay" for endorsement if Logitech or indeed Fanatec products allow consumers to experience full support from the game. So Id still expect Thrustmaster to have "Special" features or advantages.

Whats the chances that it all comes down to money and the parties agreeing if or when we see more in the way of G25/G27 support and all parties happy.
 
I'm pretty impressed with the new video. Being mainly a drifter, I like how fast the wheel is. I have a G25 with a deep-dish 350mm wheel on it, and I currently have to do a lot of throwing of the wheel, as opposed to just letting it return to center on it's own.

I wasn't interested at all, but maybe once the price goes down a bit, I'll pick one up.
 
People don't whine about the 458 being the price that it is. We just accept that it is far beyond our reach. What is within reach of many is a Ford Focus. Does a Focus perform like a 458? Is it expected to? Some people here can afford a Vette. Does a Vette perform like a 458? It's in the ballpark. Unlike the Focus, a ZR1 can at least be compared to a 458.
 
People don't whine about the 458 being the price that it is. We just accept that it is far beyond our reach. What is within reach of many is a Ford Focus. Does a Focus perform like a 458? Is it expected to? Some people here can afford a Vette. Does a Vette perform like a 458? It's in the ballpark. Unlike the Focus, a ZR1 can at least be compared to a 458.

I agree with this, that is why there are two official wheels, if you don't like the price of the Thrustmaster get the DFGT.
 
I am just saying it is not expensive when put into perspective or context.

And I am not "saying to people", I just find it actually justifies its price contextually.

Expensive and worth the price are not mutually exclusive concepts.

A NASA rocket can put you on the moon, I would give pretty much everything I own for a walk on the moon and by far think a NASA rocket is worth it's cost.

The thing is still damn expensive though!

Other titles generally go the extra mile to try and get all wheels compatible. This PD partnership has it's negatives to other wheel users.
In short PD I think ( and I'll get flames for this ) are selling alot of us out.

I will voice again that I think PD has intentionally nerfed the G27 in light of the T500. The G25 got full functionality possibly becuase it's not officially made anymore and thus not a direct threat to the official wheel, however JUST the fact that you can't acces RA menu from the G27 even when mapped to a regular button tells me PD has intentionally made the G27 less than fully functional. That's without even wondering where L3 and R3 especially when the game suddenly had enough features to warrant using a bunch more buttons...

The G25/G27 and Fanatec have never been officially supported and likely never will due to whatever may be in the legal/contract agreements between Polphony Digital / Thrustmaster & Logitech.

They are officially supported PS3 products though. That means any game that doens't work right with them is the game makers fault.

G25/G27 owners have no right to moan (i am one) but show me ANYWHERE where Logitech or Polphopny Digital listed the G25/G27 as being supported?

http://www.logitech.com/en-us/gaming/wheels/devices/5184

Ready for action? You can use this product with many current games*, including:

Gran Turismo 5™
- Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (PS3)

Look, don't go making an argument froma point of ignorance especially if the information you ask for is on the official product page.

You are REALLY going to far with your assumptions.

No, he's not. He's making a valid point that, while seemingly unlikely, is entirely possible.

First, all PC/PS3 wheels are WORKING crossplatform-wise because they all use the same HID-controller technology. All my wheels (and I had both Thrustmaster, Logitech and now Fanatec models) are cross-platform. Only non-cross -latform wheels are those Frex/ISSI/Momo ones which are being custom-made for PC with custom ID-controllers. And Xbox/X360 wheels of course.

And while this is true now, it is in no way assured for future products. Who knows what trickery and non standard methods can be used to essentially lock a product to a system.

YOU are the one making the assumption that because that's how the products NOW work that it would never be different in the future.

Second, all PC/PS3 WHEELS WORKS in all games, but some SPECIAL FUNCTIONS may be not supported (and only one I know is the RA Adjust on G27 at this point).

How do you define "special" function? Was paddle shifting in GT5P a "special function"?

Third, since T500RS is an PlayStation Official Product, it will work an all PS games onwards and probably backwards - because it utilize the same HID technology as all other wheels onthe market.

I believe his point was less that the wheel will work but that some parts of it might be nerfed like PD has done with the ability to use RA on or the buttons on the G27 that have no function in GT5.

Fourth, we already know that T50RS will not work with PC in first days, but full PC drivers are being prepared as we speak.

Which goes against your earlier claim that simply by using the same HID standard all devices are cross platform... they re cross platform once (IF) a driver is released.

And fifth, lack of full G27 support has to do with Logitech, not PD. Truth is not always welcomed, but that is how it is.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=24399741&postcount=3560

I always see this referenced and it's HIGHLY quetsionable at best.

First it's a quetion posed at PD, of course they are going to point the finger. Then the only specific example given is not a hardware compatability issue but rather something PD lists as a functional issue... and it sounds like an issue with how PD made GT5 and what they wanted Logitech to do about their own in house game making decisions.

I don't even understand how this post is supposed to mean anything... they talk about how a problem with shifting exists yet we can all shift just fine and the problem has obviously been fixed as it doens't exist in GT5... oh and hey! It was done without Logitech changing their firmware!

I think PD is big for their britches and was pissed that logitech wouldn't update the firmware on their wheel to support a development decision PD made for the game and s blamed logitech. As if something like sending out firmware updates isn't a risk and is trivial for the company...

The G27 works fine in so many other games including iRacing... but there is a firmware problem with the wheel? Bah, I call shenanigans!

That still gives no explanation for the other nerfs like button that don't work and the RA menu that CAN'T be programmed.

BTW I will point you here:

http://forums.logitech.com/t5/PLAYSTATION-3-READ-ONLY-ARCHIVE/G27-Button-Map/td-p/404863

Where an official Logitech representative clearly says that button functionality is not a logitech issue but up to the devs.

And that claim is actually backed up by the evidence the G27 supports more buttons in other games and it's amazing how GT5 is the only game to suffer this mysterious firmware failure...
 
Last edited:
Sorry to ask but with the G27, you can't map a button for the RA function but on the G25 you can?

I used the controller for the RA function in GT5P with my G25 but can't remember the limitations. Surely its the same problem and the only bad thing was that Logitech changed the shifter setup on the G27 and that meant the paddles wouldn't work and would require an update from PD, which is most unlikely for an old game.

About this T500. I'm wondering if Kaz got a Fanatec quite a while ago and seen how better it was over the Logitech G25/7. Maybe he went to Logitech and said can you make do something similar or can we do an official GT G27 branded wheel. Seems quite impressive and a contender for the Fanatec.
 
wow that latest vid looks safe :indiff:

I'm sure the wheel will be great but as far as I know it will only work on the PS3. Also it's the official wheel for GT5 so should I assume that it will support less games than other wheels such as the Porsche 911 wheel?
 
Sorry to ask but with the G27, you can't map a button for the RA function but on the G25 you can?

G25 all buttons work including all 4 red ones at the bottom of the shifter.

G27 the two outside buttons on the shifter don't work (R3 and L3) at all, the 4 bottom buttons on the wheel don't work at all.

You can assign RA to any button on the G25 and it will work. You can assign RA to any button on the G27 and it will not work. With the G25 you can use a controller if you like, with the G27 you MUST use a controller to access RA.

I used the controller for the RA function in GT5P with my G25 but can't remember the limitations. Surely its the same problem and the only bad thing was that Logitech changed the shifter setup on the G27 and that meant the paddles wouldn't work and would require an update from PD, which is most unlikely for an old game.

I am not even sure what you are saying here... but the paddle shifter problem for G27 was clearly not a firmware issue on Logitechs side as they now work in GT5 (and have always worked in a myriad of other games) without a firmware update from Logitech.

About this T500. I'm wondering if Kaz got a Fanatec quite a while ago and seen how better it was over the Logitech G25/7. Maybe he went to Logitech and said can you make do something similar or can we do an official GT G27 branded wheel. Seems quite impressive and a contender for the Fanatec.

I would be it's more like TT approached PD with desires to produce an official GT5 wheel and undercut Logitech on royalties so PD went with TT.

It also seems like a good marketing move from the point of view that you don't want to have 2 official wheels from the same company. With one being from TT you can at least now get the feeling that you aren't just paying for the same guts as the cheaper one but it's a whole new thing from a whole new company.
 
The G27 works fine in so many other games including iRacing... but there is a firmware problem with the wheel? Bah, I call shenanigans!

I feel the same way. Look at Fanatec's wheel. You telling me they couldn't make a direct profile for it? You mean to tell me that Fanatec didn't offer to help in anyway possible to give more support like using the vibration motors? We know why those motors don't get the proper use, if they did it would destroy every other wheel with added sensory input that the others physically can't do.
 
I am not even sure what you are saying here... but the paddle shifter problem for G27 was clearly not a firmware issue on Logitechs side as they now work in GT5 (and have always worked in a myriad of other games) without a firmware update from Logitech.

Well the G27 launched long after any updates to GT5P. G25 has a switch-able shifter, clutch was supported. I would say the G25 had a special setup that PD implemented. When the G27 dropped the sequential part, this conflicted to how the G25 config was setup, unofficially. I thought it was accepted that the change on Logitech's part meant the new G27 wheel wasn't operating properly. How can PD nerf this in GT5P when it launched afterwards? Other games didn't support the G25 like GT5P did. It wasn't surprising that the G27 lost some functionality. PD sorted it for GT5, naturally.

That does sound odd about the buttons though. Strange how they fix the paddles, improve the clutch function and then nerf the buttons.

If I was logitech, I wouldn't have released the G27 without testing it works with GT5P. It should overlay G25.
 
Last edited:
Well the G27 launched long after any updates to GT5P. G25 has a switch-able shifter, clutch was supported. I would say the G25 had a special setup that PD implemented. When the G27 dropped the sequential part, this conflicted to how the G25 config was setup, unofficially. I thought it was accepted that the change on Logitech's part meant the new G27 wheel wasn't operating properly. How can PD nerf this in GT5P when it launched afterwards? Other games didn't support the G25 like GT5P did. It wasn't surprising that the G27 lost some functionality. PD sorted it for GT5, naturally.

That does sound odd about the buttons though. Strange how they fix the paddles, improve the clutch function and then nerf the buttons.

If I was logitech, I wouldn't have released the G27 without testing it works with GT5P. It should overlay G25.

The shift options I am talking about on G27 not working in GT5P are the paddle shifters, not the H shift box. I am pretty sure SpecIII came out after G27 and it's not like PD couldn't have patched in some (very important) fucntionality anyway.

The point originally though was that talk about how G27 is not fully functional is a hardware problem... but it's not... between the fact that things missing in GT5 like R3 and L3 were not mising in GT5P and that features across the board work fine in other games (both PC and PS3) point the finger squarely at it being in PDs corner.

As for all your assumptions of how the G27 and G27 shifting differed, it's all fine and good to speculate but unless you have some info to back it up, it just sounds like more of the "protect PD" type logic that floats around here a lot: Find a problem, assume things that make it someone elses fault, decide that if those things are plausible go with that option instead of options which are equally plausible (or more so) but put PD in a bad light.
 
Devedander, you make valid points. It's possible PD may have limited G27 functions in order to promote sales of the T500RS. But we don't know for sure.

And this is not the thread for G27 owners to be venting in precisely because there is no evidence to the fact. This is a thread about the T500RS, and I, like many come here to read the latest news about it. Except, for the most part, all I keep reading about is the damned G27. The same posts again and again for pages about lack of G27 support and which buttons don't work etc.

If you want to vent about the lack of G27 support, and you're more than welcome to as we live in a free world, please do so in a dedicated thread. I only own a G25, but if I had a G27 I'd be annoyed too with PD. I don't get wound up easily, but it's getting annoying to say the least coming to this thread looking for new information and discussion on the T500RS, only to find yet another post on the G27.
 
Last edited:
G27 launched long after any updates.

All I see is speculation here too.

What's not speculation is how the G27 failed to work in GT5P after Logitech changed how the shifter console works. Logitech released it without it working.

PD added clutch support for GT5P, added a N for Neutral on the display and G25 works 100% with GT5P. GT4 nor the GT5P demo didn't have this. There's obviously a complication with the G27. PD may have overlooked it, the whole game is rushed. Maybe they "nerfed" the G27 alone. Other games on PS3 just use the manual shift, like paddles.

Lol at protecting PD.
 
Davelander you are quite mistaken.

G25 and G27 are NOT officially licensced PS3 products.
Look on their boxes for proof of no such description.

Just because the G27 webpage states it can be used with many games including GT5 does not mean it is fully supported or is a licensced product. You seem to misunderstand the difference in compatible and Licensced. If indeed PD decided to not fully support the product, that is their decision. We do not know the situation between Logitech and PD but I bet I am right that Sony are not pleased of companies including Fanatec which use GT5 to sell their own goods and Sony or PD get nothing in return. Lets not forget this is afterall in business or sales terms the largest racing game franchise out their.

I agree that we are fed up reading here as this is not the place for G27 woes.

This Thrustmaster is a licensced product and ensures support with every other PS3 racing games permitting a wheel, just like the DF-GT also a GT5 licensced product does. Their are two licensces here, 1x being PS3 and the other being GT5. Of course the GT5 one is likely for specialised or unique features to that product and we see this with 1080 degrees and its acclaimed enchanced resolution or precision.

Fanatec do the same as Logitech and state their wheel is fully compatible with GT5 yet to my knowledge the GT2 / GT3V2 / PWTS none of those are licensced as officially compatible and again none of them state such on their boxes. However the GT2/PWTS are X360 licensed which their box and documentation will acknowledge.
 
Last edited:
Devedander, you make valid points. It's possible PD may have limited G27 functions in order to promote sales of the T500RS. But we don't know for sure.

Agreed.

And this is not the thread for G27 owners to be venting in precisely because there is no evidence to the fact.

Disagree. The point I made are the evidence to the fact. We don't have any confirmation from PD on this one but we have confirmation from Logitech it's a game dev issue and not a hardware one (which is a claim actually backed up by other similar product unlike PD's claim it's logitechs fault).

This is a thread about the T500RS, and I, like many come here to read the latest news about it. Except, for the most part, all I keep reading about is the damned G27. The same posts again and again for pages about lack of G27 support and which buttons don't work etc.

If you want to vent about the lack of G27 support, and you're more than welcome to as we live in a free world, please do so in a dedicated thread. I don't get wound up easily, but it's getting annoying to say the least coming here looking for new info to find yet another post on the G27.

In a way it's related and in an important way to the T500... along with the features of the T500 and it's price, those looking at buying it should know what it represents and the light it paints PD in for making the choices they have made to (in my opinion) intentionally short change the custommer to force their own profits.

By buying a T500 you are essntially supporting this type of action and that is very relevant to GT5 in general and the product at hand.
 
Disagree. The point I made are the evidence to the fact. We don't have any confirmation from PD on this one but we have confirmation from Logitech it's a game dev issue and not a hardware one (which is a claim actually backed up by other similar product unlike PD's claim it's logitechs fault).

Disagree. Logitech blame PD, and PD blame Logitech. Therefore, we have NO EVIDENCE, only opinion and bias as to who you choose believe.

By buying a T500 you are essntially supporting this type of action and that is very relevant to GT5 in general and the product at hand.

Then start a thread/website/campaign/vigil highlighting your cause and the evils of PD and Thrustmaster. Secondly, again, there's no proof, only personal opinion.

Just leave Britne...er I mean this thread, alone. ;)
 
By buying a T500 you are essntially supporting this type of action and that is very relevant to GT5 in general and the product at hand.

No by buying the T500 you are paying quite a bit of money for a quite substantial product. A product however that has from his own comments been personaly overseen in its development for additional precision and a better way to experience the game.

By buying a G27, which is a PC wheel and not a PS3 licensced product you were guranteed nothing.

Simples...
 
Disagree. Logitech blame PD, and PD blame Logitech. Therefore, we have NO EVIDENCE, only opinion and bias as to who you choose believe.

No.

PD blame logitech and site issues that are not hardware incompataiblitie and magically get resolved later without logitech updating firmware.

Logitech point out that the button useage is up to the game developer and this at least is backed up by the fact that indeed other games do fully support the buttons and functions and some functions that were in GT5P are not in GT5 (notably L3 and R3).

Both point the finger is not the same as both point the finger but one sides story absolutely doesn't hold up while the other sides story is backed up by pretty much every real world example I can come up with.

You can't just ignore all the reasons put forth and then claim there are no reasons so it's just opinion.

Then start a thread/website/campaign/vigil highlighting your cause and the evils of PD and Thrustmaster. Secondly, again, there's no proof, only personal opinion.

Just leave Britne...er I mean this thread, alone. ;)

Again see above, evidence is sited, you may not like it but it's there. The only thing not there is official admitance from PD the problem is on their end... how reasonable is it to demand that as evidence before accepting what common sense and logic will tell from simply looking at the situation.

Davelander you are quite mistaken.

G25 and G27 are NOT officially licensced PS3 products.
Look on their boxes for proof of no such description.

I remind you that you asked:
G25/G27 owners have no right to moan (i am one) but show me ANYWHERE where Logitech or Polphopny Digital listed the G25/G27 as being supported?

And I showed you. That's ignoring that the G27 says right on the box "Works with PS3".

Just because the G27 webpage states it can be used with many games including GT5 does not mean it is fully supported or is a licensced product. You seem to misunderstand the difference in compatible and Licensced.

No, I actually understand very much the difference. During the 3.50 ulicensed product ban news certain peripherals were brought up and I recall the logitech line of wheels being licensed PS products. I could be wrong on that, but even if I am, it doens't change that what you asked for is in fact right there...

If indeed PD decided to not fully support the product, that is their decision. We do not know the situation between Logitech and PD but I bet I am right that Sony are not pleased of companies including Fanatec which use GT5 to sell their own goods and Sony or PD get nothing in return. Lets not forget this is afterall in business or sales terms the largest racing game franchise out their.

Not happy? Who knows, but it's a symbiotic relationship to be sure... how many of us stick to GT5 and PS3 in large because there is no good force feedback wheel option on 360?

Remember, Sony revoke licenses and block unlicensed products in firmware. Your assumption seems to overlook this.

This Thrustmaster is a licensced product and ensures support with every other PS3 racing games permitting a wheel, just like the DF-GT also a GT5 licensced product does. Their are two licensces here, 1x being PS3 and the other being GT5. Of course the GT5 one is likely for specialised or unique features to that product and we see this with 1080 degrees and its acclaimed enchanced resolution or precision.

I agree that a product licensed to a game should be absolutely functional, however obvious nerfing of competiting products is just dirty poker.

No by buying the T500 you are paying quite a bit of money for a quite substantial product. A product however that has from his own comments been personaly overseen in its development for additional precision and a better way to experience the game.

By buying a G27, which is a PC wheel and not a PS3 licensced product you were guranteed nothing.

Simples...

You act as if the two situations as mutually exclusive.

By buying a T500 you are BOTH supporting this type of business AND buying something that is marketed as being very high end and personally overseen by PD (I say marketed as because you have to be very careful what you believe from marketing talk - especially when PD is involved).
 
Not happy? Who knows, but it's a symbiotic relationship to be sure... how many of us stick to GT5 and PS3 in large because there is no good force feedback wheel option on 360?

Remember, Sony revoke licenses and block unlicensed products in firmware. Your assumption seems to overlook this.

You may be upset that your wheel doesn't fully work with the game, but what Latte is saying is correct... Neither the G25 or G27 are officially licensed products, they are PC wheels and quite frankly, as abrasive as it may sound you have no right to expect/demand that it works fully as a PS3 wheel.

Now, the advantage the PS3 has over the X360 is that it works with a lot of regular USB devices. The X360 only works with licensed products as far as I know, which is why neither the Fanatecs nor Logitechs work with it, unless they were designed for it (I think there's a Fanatec that does). That's why the G27/25 work to a certain extent, the axes (wheel, pedals) work but not all the buttons.

Your last statment is not entirely correct but also not entirely wrong. There was a firmware in which SONY blocked a few devices from working, but trust me, they didn't block even half of them. I have a MS Sidewinder Precision 2 I bought in 1999. The thing has a big "Designed for Windows 98" sign on its box and I plugged it in on my PS3. Some of the buttons work on the XMB and the one of the axes can be used to navigate the XMB. I recently purchased a Thrustmaster joystick for the PC that works on the Birds of Prey game, but the axes are all scrambled and you can't configure them.

Just because an input controller (partially) works on the PS3 doesn't mean that 1- It should be supported fully 2- The game developers have an obligation to make it work.

You spent your hard earned money on your wheel, I understand your frustration but I also believe you have wrong expectations, and that you're not discussing them in the right place.
 
Well Davelander as determind as you are to disrupt the thread....

Okay the point being as you were aware and I will this time make it more clear. PD nor Logitech never have guranteed or state their products were designed to be fully compatible. As a licensced product you would be guranteed that but do Logitech state their wheel is Licensced for PS3 usage?

The G27 box does not state "PS3 Official Licensced Product" like the DF-GT box does so I presume then Logitech offer no gurantee it will fully work with all PS3 games?

If your angry because full support isnt their, then take your issue up with Logitech for advertising that the game is listed as working on their website and make a complaint to the advertising standards.

Lets stick to the product being discussed.
 
I agree that a product licensed to a game should be absolutely functional, however obvious nerfing of competiting products is just dirty poker.

If PD wanted to nerf the G25 or G27 then why wouldn't the nerf something that's absolutely critical to the game? Like the brake pedal, gas pedal ect? All of that actually works. The only thing that you can't do with the those two wheels is program the buttons. Yes that sucks but it by no means hurts the experience. You can still fully enjoy GT5 with either of those wheels. I know that I have a G25 and at no point have I had any issues playing with it.

At the end of the day PD never promoted either of those wheels. They made it crystal clear that the official GT5 wheel was the DFGT, so if full support really was high on your list then you should've bought it as it was safe bet to be fully supported. They owe it to those customers as they promoted the product to them specifically. Just as they'll owe full support to the T500 customers as they're promoting the game and wheel to them.
 
And while this is true now, it is in no way assured for future products. Who knows what trickery and non standard methods can be used to essentially lock a product to a system.

YOU are the one making the assumption that because that's how the products NOW work that it would never be different in the future.
At least he uses the past to back his assumptions. About the future this is true with every product. We are not guarantied Kinect, Fanatec wheel, X360 wireless wheels and X360 controller will work on Xbox 720. No guarantied any wheel today will work on PS4 either.
 
You may be upset that your wheel doesn't fully work with the game, but what Latte is saying is correct... Neither the G25 or G27 are officially licensed products, they are PC wheels and quite frankly, as abrasive as it may sound you have no right to expect/demand that it works fully as a PS3 wheel.

And what he said before (which is what I was addressbing before he quickly changed the subject to something similar but different) was that it was not said anywhere that the G27 would work with GT5. It is in fact said on the product page itself and the product box says works with PS3.

Now, the advantage the PS3 has over the X360 is that it works with a lot of regular USB devices. The X360 only works with licensed products as far as I know, which is why neither the Fanatecs nor Logitechs work with it, unless they were designed for it (I think there's a Fanatec that does). That's why the G27/25 work to a certain extent, the axes (wheel, pedals) work but not all the buttons.

This is an assumption from a point of ignornace. Did you know that the L3 and R3 buttons that don't work on the G27 in GT5 DID work in GT5P? Did you know that all the buttons on the G25 DO work in GT5 as well as the RA menu?

See what you are doing is arguing a phlilisophical standpoint but it's clear you don't actually understand the real world situation which always trump the philisophical and theoreticalones.

Your last statment is not entirely correct but also not entirely wrong. There was a firmware in which SONY blocked a few devices from working, but trust me, they didn't block even half of them. I have a MS Sidewinder Precision 2 I bought in 1999. The thing has a big "Designed for Windows 98" sign on its box and I plugged it in on my PS3. Some of the buttons work on the XMB and the one of the axes can be used to navigate the XMB. I recently purchased a Thrustmaster joystick for the PC that works on the Birds of Prey game, but the axes are all scrambled and you can't configure them.

Actually you will note that I said logitech wheels (in general) were brought up as not being banned becaues they had a standing license. Now I have to admit that I haven't dug up the source on that and maybe even that source is questionable, but that's where I am coming from and it doens't change in any way MrLatte's original request that someone show him somewhere that it's said that the G27 works with GT5 (which I did).

You spent your hard earned money on your wheel, I understand your frustration but I also believe you have wrong expectations, and that you're not discussing them in the right place.

I am frustrated less that it doesn't work but more as to why I believe it doesn't work. It's one thing not to play nice, it's another to play dirty directly, especially when I think PD are bold face lying about intent to fully support G27... I think the exact opposite is true.

As for the right place... I am not the one who brought it up and plenty have commmented in depth before me... not sure why it's suddenly such an issue to you other than that I am not defending PD in my stance.

Well Davelander as determind as you are to disrupt the thread....

I will point out that I was responding to others on the topic, yourself included, so if anyone was going to disrupt this thread, I think the blame falls back partially on yourself.

Okay the point being as you were aware and I will this time make it more clear. PD nor Logitech never have guranteed or state their products were designed to be fully compatible. As a licensced product you would be guranteed that but do Logitech state their wheel is Licensced for PS3 usage?

That's not what you said before and is a much broader and harder to debate subject. But yes, I would expect that a product that is shown to be compatible hardware and functions in other games on the same console would not loose function between successive iterations of a game like loosing the entire function of L3 and R3.

The G27 box does not state "PS3 Official Licensced Product" like the DF-GT box does so I presume then Logitech offer no gurantee it will fully work with all PS3 games?

I will point out again my growing distaste for the beaten wife syndrome the consumer base in general is taking in which it seems assumed that we have no rights or expectations unless specifically written out for us. What ever happened to reasonable assumption of functionality baring any specific contradiction from the seller?

I am truly amazed at the speed with which the industry has beaten the average consumer down from "EULAs are unreaonsable and shouldn't be allowed to over ride our rights as consumers" to "if they didn't PROMISE it to you implicity, you have no reaosn to want it".

If your angry because full support isnt their, then take your issue up with Logitech for advertising that the game is listed as working on their website and make a complaint to the advertising standards.

I did take bring it up with Logitech as well, but by the same logic it's something to be brought up with PD as they have claimed reasons for it being they way it is that appear pattently untrue and have attempted to garner good faith by claiming they want to fix it when it all likeliehood they have nerfed it.

Again, an attempt to deflect any responsibility from PD... very common lately...

If PD wanted to nerf the G25 or G27 then why wouldn't the nerf something that's absolutely critical to the game? Like the brake pedal, gas pedal ect? All of that actually works. The only thing that you can't do with the those two wheels is program the buttons. Yes that sucks but it by no means hurts the experience. You can still fully enjoy GT5 with either of those wheels. I know that I have a G25 and at no point have I had any issues playing with it.

Because they want to maintain good faith from the user base. It's one thing to say "oh we wish it worked better, maybe someday" and another to completely kill off it's functionality entirely. When leveraging your product ties, you want to do what you can to make your product relativey better (which in this case seems to include making the other products worse) while maintaining a good face with the market. Remember the heat MS took for killing off the Xbox when the 360 came around? Think that, but WAY more angrifying and blatent if PD just killed off the gas pedal on the G27.

PD maintains plausible deniability (although every reason offered up so far ha been full of holes) and they get the community to do their dirty work for them and turn on itself to defend their decision and attack our fellow consumers who are also getting the shaft. Quite brilliant really.

Instead of asking why didn't they do this, why not look at what they DID do and ask "is there anyway this ISN'T inentional nerfing?" I mean buttons that worked in GT5P now don't respond at all and the RA function simply won't come up even when mapped to buttons that DO work for other features. How do you explain that other than intentional?

Basically it would be VERY bad business to shut out a large chunk of the userbase who has shown they will pay $$$ for a peripheral, but if you can make them feel "hmmm, mines not as good as this other one, sure it's a lot of $$$ but at least it works all around so it's worth it" then that's golden.

It's all business and marketing, think about it, we have an official wheel coming out sans h shifter and looking to lack a few buttons, best way to make sure the competition that clocks in at roughly half the price with a solid product doesn't eat into your sales? Defeat a few non critical functions to ensure that no one says from day one "WTF? Why would I buy that $600 wheel when this $300 wheel literally does everything AND come with an hshifter?"

At the end of the day PD never promoted either of those wheels. They made it crystal clear that the official GT5 wheel was the DFGT, so if full support really was high on your list then you should've bought it as it was safe bet to be fully supported. They owe it to those customers as they promoted the product to them specifically. Just as they'll owe full support to the T500 customers as they're promoting the game and wheel to them.

It's not a question of promise. I never said it was... it's a question of shady busines practices and screwing us over... and I will add to boot, ingeniously making the fan base turn on itself to defend their own tactics.

Some of the arguments and attitudes around here remind me of war documentaries where you see soliders berrating their fellow soldiers for not making obviously horrible deicisions because "you weren't promised to come out of this alive and sometimes war require hard decisions".

It's pretty scary and sad how easily people are controlled sometimes to turn agains their fellows and work FOR the very entity which they should be unhappy with. I guess the term "sheeple" had to come from somewhere.

At least he uses the past to back his assumptions. About the future this is true with every product. We are not guarantied Kinect, Fanatec wheel, X360 wireless wheels and X360 controller will work on Xbox 720. No guarantied any wheel today will work on PS4 either.

Now he uses correlation and ignores causation. I use logic and actual undertanding of the underlying reaons why something happens, not just how they have always been.

There is a saying "past performance does not dictate future actions". If just looking at the past could tell you what would happen in the future, we would never have to pay for online gaming on top of our ISP charges, we would never have to pay for DLC and we would never have had a GT without a career mode (GTPSP).
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back