What would you rate this game on a scale of 1-100?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattv81
  • 293 comments
  • 15,979 views
Single player is a 40 to me. B-spec is just a waste of time. A-Spec has way too little events though driving the cars in those events make up for it in a way. Licenses are of no use but EXP, money and prize cars. Special Events are decent. Oh yeah and the fact that all prize cars are purchasable make me sad.
 
60, it feels so much like GT4, its like a minor upgrade not a new version. Annoying menu things they could have fixed they didn't, damage is still a joke, online is so slow and kludgy to use. In a real racing simulator you shouldn't be able to dive into the inside of a car heading into a corner knowing it'll just bounce off and slow you a little. Or hit a wall head-on at 400kph and still get back in the race and win!
 
I give it a 100 for everything, I love the grapics (even on a standard definition TV), the gameplay, menus and newer cars. :):)
 
For most of serious racing drivers or car enthusiasts, I guess, they would rate higher because the realistic physics and the variety of cars. But, for most of the general gamers, they would give a very low mark because the game is not funny (poor game design) and there is a lot of torture (grinding). I would say GT6 or GT5 update have to focus on the fun of the game. Listen to what gamers say and think what we want is the way to go.

Personally, I would give 80 because I like driving.
 
For most of serious racing drivers or car enthusiasts, I guess, they would rate higher because the realistic physics and the variety of cars. But, for most of the general gamers, they would give a very low mark because the game is not funny (poor game design) and there is a lot of torture (grinding). I would say GT6 or GT5 update have to focus on the fun of the game. Listen to what gamers say and think what we want is the way to go.

Personally, I would give 80 because I like driving.

I'm a hardcore sim racer and I gave it a low mark because the physics, AI, and online mode.
I do understand that you said "most", but most serious racing drivers wouldn't use GT5. Car enthusiasts, on the other hand, would probably play GT5 because of the good chance of their cars being in this game.
 
I find it hard to rate GT games because I never really consider them to be in the same category as your average game. It seems, though, that in their efforts to make GT a better "game" (what with the levelling system etc.), PD have detracted from the brilliant physics model and beautiful attention to detail.

GT to me has always been about the cars, and the latest iteration feels a bit diluted in this regard. The whole standard/premium issue doesn't really need any introduction and other elements such as the tuning and the AI don't seem to have improved at all. If anything, the AI seemed better in GT5P.

Anyway if I were rate it as a "game" in the traditional sense, I would give it about a 7. But if I were to isolate the best aspects of the game and, say, just lap the Nordschleife all day in premium cars only, then I still have to give it a perfect 10. It just doesn't get any better IMO

This is spot on for me, especially the last paragraph.
 
Last edited:
60

-20 for Standars

-10 for Car Sounds

-10 for Low options of rims.
 
60

-20 for Standars

-10 for Car Sounds

-10 for Low options of rims.

So if the perfect racing game had no custom rims, you'd rate it below 90?
To me changing rims is just a silly detail, nothing important to rate the game by.
 
Day 1: I would have given it a 90
Day 15: it was about 82

Today (~day 45): I am giving it a 96

Once I stopped worrying about leveling I've been having so much fun. Been crushing license tests (some of those are unbelievably fun), playing with photo mode, special events. I am going to gold the Vettel Challenge and get all the levels I need. In the mean time, the game is absolutely fantastic!!!
 
I'm a hardcore sim racer and I gave it a low mark because the physics, AI, and online mode.
I do understand that you said "most", but most serious racing drivers wouldn't use GT5. Car enthusiasts, on the other hand, would probably play GT5 because of the good chance of their cars being in this game.

Did you see that Top Gear article about a very hardcore sim racer, who was tested in a real racing car, on a real track, to see if his computer racing skills actually translated into real life? Pretty interesting stuff.
Can find the link if you're interested ^^

Edit:
Actually, I wanted to find it anyway. So here it is. have a look :)
 
Last edited:
I give it 30, perhaps 40 at tops, and I'm being very generous here.

As far as concerning the physics (rallying excluded, which is terrible) and the premium cars, it's good. On the other hand; no replay value, boring single player, grinding, the godforsaken AI to name a few issues lowers the score strikingly.
 
I have been with the series since GT1. For me the cons out weigh the pros unfortunately.

-Nov 24th release-71
-Up to1.05 patch-75
-Add all tracks that were in GT4-81
-^Add all previous GT tracks/events -85
-^Upgrade 25% of standards to premiums-87
-^Upgrade 50% of standards to premums-90
-^No standards-95
-^Add previous GT car options, car setups saves, championship/endurance saves, a-spec/b-spec like in GT4, dynamic weather on more tracks, eliminate level system, larger a-spec, better course maker control, used car garage from GT4, true improved A.I., flag system, eliminate one time paint color, make a true paint palette -99

Basically this game can become great via updates and DLC. The problem is how long will it take to achieve this.
 
Last edited:
I give it 30, perhaps 40 at tops, and I'm being very generous here.

As far as concerning the physics (rallying excluded, which is terrible) and the premium cars, it's good. On the other hand; no replay value, boring single player, grinding, the godforsaken AI to name a few issues lowers the score strikingly.

if you rate the game 30 you simply don't like racing games, and has no reason to be playing the game.

The core elements of the game, the racing itself, it excellent.
As others have said, a top simulator, in a mediocre game.
30, or 40, is a horrible game, with nothing going for it.

I honestly don't get why people who rate the game 30'ish are playing it in the first place.
If you really hate it that much, you've got to have hated racing games in the first place, and there's no reason for you to be rating a racing game, let alone a GT game.
 
I'll give it a 90 as a former WoW player grinding doesn't phase me lol, game is still missing some important features though.
 
1028 game days - I rate it 95, great but not quite perfect.

It's a racing/driving game, if you call it grinding then you are missing the point.
 
94. Easily the best racing game I've ever played. It's not perfect by any means, but the flaws that it does have don't really bother me too much.

I have to call b.s. on everyone rating the game poorly. If you really rate the game at 60 or whatever, why would you still play it. If I ever that a game was that bad it wouldn't ever leave its case. There are too many good games out to keep playing this if you really think it is so horrible. If you are spending hours a day playing a game then you are obviously having quite a bit of fun playing it. Just admit its a good game that does have some flaws, but a good game nonetheless.
 
98.564612156156168484561515618648446845165184771516541564798415631151561864768151561313215618456415641894789795415415685648546973285485468532015864168585462544856865486547854785475475475475475475475475475475475475475475475475473464164158464555555555555555555558648647685478645168548694864765414687894561456468686478465546854618545643125121233120031232131215635641564456546154615461654156311515635654684684485654165416346185384684678644688897879685468541535315154684854648512546125461284684565481543124853854844684668446468544646884641133768544868461861854691337
 
The cars are fun to drive, it has Nordschleife and you can race online.

The a-spec is short and uninteresting and not really even fun. In previous gt games I've always struggeled with not doing one more race before going to bed. "just one more"... In gt5 doing the a-spec races was a chore and I had to force myself do them. It is almost impossible to guess the right combination of tires, bhp and car choise for a good race. This is even more of a problem because in the races there is usually one rabbit car that is a lot faster than the rest so you need to aim to match that rabbit car and not just fill in with a car that has similar performance like the rest of the field.

There are some really awful design decisions like paint chips, not being able to save during endurance races, cars you need to wait for to appear in the ucd so you can do a race, museum, horrible prize cars and prizes, totally missed opportunites with content (Nordschleife, top gear track, most of the cars...) and almost total lack of gaming features (for some races you need a certain type of car but that's all) which makes a-spec repetitive and uninteresting. The menus are awkward and a lot of the time I find myself going back and forth watching the long loading screens and waiting stuff to happen. The leveling system adds nothing positive to the experience and feels like an after thought.

Cars sound pretty bad but look great, especially the premium ones. I'm not too bothered about the looks of the standard ones. Rather have them looking a bit ugly than not at all. I want to drive the cars not to look at them. Which is why I also find b-spec really awful. I never cared for the photomode so don't care about that really. Nice to have I'd guess. Graphics as a whole look pretty good most of the time. Shadows are jagged and sometimes the game manages to look really out of date too.

Track generator is kind of "is it really there" at the moment. You can't really use it for anything else than race against ai using the track you generated. Tracks made with it tend to be really long and have really exaggarated elevations. The ai is bad too.

The difficulty levels vary horribly too. A-spec as a whole is more of battle against boredom than racing. It can be challenging if you really put effort into finding a car and tuning it just right to make it challenging but it's still nothing more than about overtaking the ai cars as quickly as you can. some of the lisence test can be challenging and the vettel challenge is really the only challenge there is in the game. Seasonal events is a nice addon to the short list of events in gt5 but seem to suffer from the same problems as a-spec. The money from those helps with the grinding though which is another problem with the game. Getting the money to buy cars is all about pressing one button in b-spec or doing roundyrounds in one super easy race. Online is pretty fun but also limited and has few showstopper bugs.

I could go on to list negatives (even though I already did :sly:) but I don't want to say it is a totally awful product or give the impression that I hate it. Of course I expected more from a gt game. I thought my expectations were reasonable (drives great, lots and lots of races, fun ai to race against and properly laid out events). 1 out of 4.

Driving is still fun and that's what really matters to me. And it has nordschleife. Plus it has updates coming which will make it better. But I can't really see it improving so much that I'd be playing it few months from now.

I wrote this as a short piece but after every time I read it though I rememberd more bad stuff that I wanted to add. I could still go on listing the "stupidities" but I stop here...

So I give it 75/100. If the cars weren't fun to drive and it didn't have the 'ring I'd give it 10/100.
 
Last edited:
85, game needed more content.

Standard cars look really bad (they should have worked a bit more on standard cars.[Some of them might become Premium, though.])

There's no way to buy all cars without grinding. It takes a while to get enough credits for some cars.

Game needs better customization options like: Rims, body kits, spoilers and paint.

Online mode needed more options, too. Like Drivetrain restrictions.

Everything else is very good on the game
 
Music!!??? You can add whatever you want how can you knock them for that anyway it's all taste and it's different for everybody. That's why you add your own!!!

I'll tell you liars this much if I ever thought a game was below a 60 I just wouldn't play it, yet you people not only play it are active on it's forums, crazy!!!
 
94. Easily the best racing game I've ever played. It's not perfect by any means, but the flaws that it does have don't really bother me too much.

I have to call b.s. on everyone rating the game poorly. If you really rate the game at 60 or whatever, why would you still play it?




Honestly, I don't play it. I might do another A-Spec endurance race, but for me, I'm basically already done with A-Spec, which is why I agree that the 50 score for gameplay is accurate, and that's "gameplay" as in single player continuity and replay value for the racing events themselves.

Now buying cars, testing them, tuning them, etc. Nordschleife!! that's where the 95 comes in for me. I don't categorize that with "gameplay" although it is it's own form of gameplay. Truly, they really need to release some more events for this game. If there weren't some really great online communities that I participate in I don't know what else I would do. There's only so many times you can re-race the 4-5 solid events on this game.


What this game needs is a racing season!! Man, that would be the best. I can't wait to get F1 2010 just to compete in seasons and progress as a driver.
 
How can you be done with A-spec?

I think it's great fun doing some races again with other (less powerful) cars.
GT has never been about seasons but about driving as many diferent cars as possible.

And the Stock Golf GTI competition I'm running with my friends is also great fun.

For me the game is a solid 90
 
Lol, maybe that was a little harsh. I just mean that I've realized that I don't play it much any more. That's really probably because right now my focus is on getting new cars and setting up tunes. It's my new fixation with the game, and I don't have a lot of time these days to play, so most of my efforts are spent grinding B-Spec while I get work done and then I come back and buy a car and tune it for a few hours. I'm sure I'll run some of the A-Spec races again. The earlier ones use some of the cooler tracks anyway, imo.
 
Music!!??? You can add whatever you want how can you knock them for that anyway it's all taste and it's different for everybody. That's why you add your own!!!
Unless you try to play it online.

I'll tell you liars this much if I ever thought a game was below a 60 I just wouldn't play it, yet you people not only play it are active on it's forums, crazy!!!
I haven't really played the game in probably 3 weeks (mostly because my wheel mount is broken, I admit, but I recently gave up fiddling around with B-Spec as well). I'd give the game a 70 or so in its current state, and have already gone back to playing the games I was playing before GT5 came out (and that includes GT2 and GT3). Being active on these forums have nothing to do with GT5 for me, nor does it for many others, I'm sure.

1028 game days - I rate it 95, great but not quite perfect.

It's a racing/driving game, if you call it grinding then you are missing the point.

That you not only have said it here, but that you continue to repeat saying this nonsense shows just how much you fail to understand the people who criticize the grinding.
 
Last edited:
Spec A + overpower + Chore - Stupid AI = Win & Boredom
Some more restrictions should be placed for some races. If it has challenges, there is fun when overcoming it.

Overalls, the physics is great and I'll give it 80.
 
Back