What would you rate this game on a scale of 1-100?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattv81
  • 293 comments
  • 15,970 views
I hope you all are aware that the owner of this site, GT Planet, reads these forums and I'm quite certain he would not approve of you all posting so many negative comments about Gran Turismo 5. I would advise that you go over your criticism with a fine picked comb and select your words carefully.

I bet none of you even know the name of the owner of GT Planet.
 
I would give the game 90. I have had it since day of release I am lvl 23 (yes I hav a life outside gt) and love it. Yes b-spec is a massive pile of poo and A-spec is way 2 short damage is horribly and lots of other stuff is wrong. However I love gt and hav been a massive fan since the original way back when. I'm sure they will continue 2 fix and update the game (fingers crossed anyway) and make it better.

The thing is aswell that every racing game is compared 2 gt, just like every phone is compared 2 the iPhone, so in that sense it is still amazing 2 have that power over other racers.
 
I hope you all are aware that the owner of this site, GT Planet, reads these forums and I'm quite certain he would not approve of you all posting so many negative comments about Gran Turismo 5. I would advise that you go over your criticism with a fine picked comb and select your words carefully.

I bet none of you even know the name of the owner of GT Planet.

Who owns it?
 
I hope you all are aware that the owner of this site, GT Planet, reads these forums and I'm quite certain he would not approve of you all posting so many negative comments about Gran Turismo 5. I would advise that you go over your criticism with a fine picked comb and select your words carefully.

I bet none of you even know the name of the owner of GT Planet.

What are you talking about? We all know who owns GT Planet, he posts all the news, but even then what has that got to do with commenting on the game? He didn't make it, and there are plenty of negative comments on this site.
 
95/100

Great game, get your money's worth as a full time player can play it for weeks before the grind at lvl 30+ sets in.

the 5 missing is because of the end content grind. Much too long, much too stupid, fail in that department.

Overall however, great game.
 
75 as I'm just Level 26 both A and B Specs.
I bet I'll finish all B-Specs first as Bob is already level 30.
Still have the Nascar event to finish...
75 because my favorite line of cars (Chevy Camaro 69, ZR1, Impala) are all premium which is the reason why its a 75. The lacking 25 is because, the license test is a total failure for me.. meaning the License test is there for no purpose at all. The levelling part is understandable but it leads to grinding and the un-resonably insane prices of Classic modelled cars are turning me off. Plus the Overhaul and Resto options is insanely expensive. Yes, I do have the 5 stealth cars BUT sad to say they're crappier than the premium cars... Standard cars... feels like the game is in-complete and was JUST launched to be ON OVERLY delayed Scheduled release of the game.
Maybe I'll gine the other 25 if PD/Kaz GT5 would make up for the UNFURNISHED edges of the game proper.
PS: Hoping they make it up on the UPDATES and BTW, the SAVE option is one of my Requests.. PLease make it an option to turn it off.
Adding this option, WILL make DUPING "STOP". PLEaaaaaase !
Thank You for reading.
 
PS: Hoping they make it up on the UPDATES and BTW, the SAVE option is one of my Requests.. PLease make it an option to turn it off.
Adding this option, WILL make DUPING "STOP". PLEaaaaaase !
Thank You for reading.

How will it?
 
Somewhere in the 75-80 range. I really want to give the game a score in the 90s, and hoping it will get there in the next year. That being said, it's my favorite game in the last several years, and will continue to be until a better racing sim/game comes along.
 
WOW, i'm surprised with how many bad ratings you guys gave it. At one moment, i tought i was on some NFS forum.. I guess it depends if you want destruction derby / nfs arcade kind of racing game or real driving experience.

The most annoying thing is when i see comments like "it took 6 years to make, therefore its a bad game". I cannot stress enough the absolute insignificance of comparing the making period of a game with its quality. Even if it took 100000000 years to make tetris i would still love it and if it took 1 nanosecond to make Blur, i would still hate it.

Anyways, the game is ridiculously good, thou there are some issues.

Few things that are reducing 100/100 rating for me are:
- slow menus: -3% (this is the most annoying thing in game for me)
- standard cars: -2%
- not so good AI: -1%
- bad shadows: -1%


Verdict: 93%

I also want to add that those cons i stated influenced my rating so little, because of the magnificance of the rest of the game. For instance, if some indy arcade had such slow menus i would droped its rating much more.
You just cannot lower the rating so much, on game this huge and wonderful, as most of you guys did, just for couple of mistakes.
 
What are you talking about? We all know who owns GT Planet, he posts all the news, but even then what has that got to do with commenting on the game? He didn't make it, and there are plenty of negative comments on this site.

1)He does not post the news. If you can prove otherwise, post a link.

2)He doesn't enjoy reading bad things being said about his game.
 
about 70 - for those with 90+ 100 is PERFECT FLAWLESS GAME

+better AI
+it's new GT
+you aren't forced to do licences
+lot of cars (i don't mind standard)

0 Online events were really cool, but they are just stupid without limitations
0 You can backup save (it's normal with most of games), because i have 2 PS3

- I hoped there will be more races than in GT4 and more of them for common cars hahaha
- Level system isn't bad idea, but you can use cars of higher level if you win them or get them (like stealths, bday cars, trades...)
- After level 25 you MUST repeat races with high exp. gain, which is so stupid and NO-fun
- So few NEW cars 2007-2010
- races looks too easy to me (and I'm not a good drive average at best)
- Your driver is idiot at B-spec when it comes to overtaking
- Rotation in UCD - you can wait forrever for some cars
- Bad rally implementation - you cannot repeat it for additional money = stupid
-20 000 000 cars
- no save option in championship (i don't have time to do Formula GP)
 
Last edited:
I'd give GT5 a 91.

Deduct a couple of points for

lack of A-Spec races (made up for with seasonal events though, so not many) I liked having 80+ events like in the previous GT games, and more events with model/hp/other limitations.

weak home menu (not a big deal b/c it doesn't actually detract from the gameplay, just not as pretty as I hoped)

and -1 for Bob (he doesn't seem to learn 'in race' - I see him make the same spinouts on the same turns over and over again)

everything else about it is fantastic, and what a GT game should be all about - the cars and the driving.
 
1)He does not post the news. If you can prove otherwise, post a link.

2)He doesn't enjoy reading bad things being said about his game.

I really wish 'he' did own this forum and reads these posts. Someone at PD needs to listen to what we think. We bought the game we have a right to comment on whether we think it met our expectations.

Any respectable developer would really want to know what their customers think & what they can improve on
 
85. It's a great game and 85 is a "great" score. It's not so much a racing game as a car collecting game. The AI is brain dead and there's no scalable difficulty, so you're left with winning races by a mile or losing by a mile, unless you want to buy 9 sets of tires for every car and figure out the precise amount of artificial handicap you need to give yourself in order to have a competitive race with the AI, only to have them mindlessly ram you off the track anyway.

I'm at level 31 A-spec and 36 B-spec, and all I'm doing is buying cars and then running them around tracks just to experience them. But I've driven all these tracks countless times now, and it really doesn't help that I drove all these same tracks countless times in GT4. The track creator is a nice addition, but it doesn't take long to figure out that you're just creating variations on one track (in each theme), and not really different tracks. I think I'll probably have a bit more fun making some snow tracks, but then it'll be time to move on to another game.
 
Personally for me its an easy 95. Just personal opinion obviously and based mainly on how much fun I am having with the game. I can understand the criticism of others and why that lowers their scores (although the level some people lower them to is clearly over the top. 50/100..... really? On Metacritic that would say that 'Lair' is the better game ;) )

The thing with GT5 is I can just sit back and enjoy the pure fun of racing more so than with any other game I have tried. I can spend an endurance race just marvelling at how real the driving feels. GT5 really has become (for me) the 'Real driving simulator'.

I can understnad the criticism of standard cars not having a cockpit view but I so rarely drive in cockpit view its a none issue for me. Same with people complaining about gear ratios etc. I'm just not much into tunning......if you are I can see why that is a big disapointment for you and why you would mark the game down for it. But for me its a none issue.

The only real negative I have is the shadows which just look so bad that they are a constant distraction. But ballance that against a few hours driving the Suzuka endurance race watching the weather slowly change from a sunny day to rain with just the utter joy of throwing my car around the track racing close enough that any mistake is going to cost me the race.

GT5 hasn't been out of my PS3 since the day it came out and there hasn't been a day I havent been able to put at least a couple of hours into it........if that isn't a 95% game I don't know what is.
 
At first release it was no higher than a 70. Now I'd say it's a 75. Solid game overall, but just for comparison, I give every previous GT game between 85-95.

The Driving simulation, as usual is excellent. All the other components that make GT a game are unfortunately subpar. It's encouraging that they're trying to fix the issues, but a lot of them simply shouldn't have been there to begin with.
 
People rating this game at 70 or below need to have a real look at the quality of other games and sims out there to get things in perspective.

It's basically a 50 at best

You have got to be kidding. Games that score 50% are unplayable the majority of the time, look awful, sound awful, and provide no more than an hour or two of fun if any at all.
 
70

Was a bit disappointed after a few days I started playing GT Life...thinking "I waited so many years to replay the same races in GT4???!!!" "I had to do this all over again???!!!"

I think many of us rated 70 or below was due to the high expectation and hype before its launch. As well as the long wait caused us to believe "Its gotta be good"...at the end...it turns out...well..."its good...but not THAT good"...

I believe...its a great game...but its not the BEST game....
 
I'd give it an 82. We all know the good points of the game, so here's the bad points.

-B Spec mode is awful. Boring. No one is interested in this mode, that's why everyone hits start and does other activities that don't involve GT5 while Bob is racing.

-HDD usage, graphics, load times. With this much HDD usage, the graphics should be better. Alternatively, with graphics like they are now, load times should be smaller. Either way, there's no good tradeoff here.

-Poor gameplay elements. XP system is poorly done, requires "grinding." Not enough events. License Tests looked like they are out of place.

-Online mode with strangers is unplayable. So many things wrong with it.
 
Out of 100, I give the game a 95. I'll break down the 10 category scores that explain my reasoning, albeit brief.

Physics: 10/10 - Outstanding. Having a project lead who doubles as a semi-professional race car driver makes all the difference in the world. The low speed physics in GT5 need some work though. Not having an auto steer forced down my throat is a bonus.

Graphics: 10/10 - The Premium models are unmatched on the console, and blur the line between reality and virtual in GT5's Photo Mode. The Shadows and Standard models are the only thing that keeps this game from being beyond perfect from a visual standpoint.

Sound: 9/10 - Easily the best sounding Gran Turismo game to date. I have absolutely fallen in love when you change your car in the garage. The sound coming from an impact is one of the best I have heard (agree with ISR). The only complaint here is the louder then normal transmission whine, and some of the cars not sounding as good as the others.

Control: 10/10 - I am a 75% DS3 user, and once again PD doesn't disappoint. I can completely customize my controller to my liking, and that, in my book is the most important feature anywhere. I have a Logitech Racing wheel, and it worked fine, albeit not fully supported. It's obvious PD has moved on to the T500.

Customization: 7/10 - The Racing Mod option makes it's return to Gran Turismo, and it's awesome and limited all in the same sentence. What hurts this area of the game is the fact that most Standard models can't be customized at all. All PD needed to do was give the player the option for wheels, and I would have been happy since I am not that into a livery system (never used it but once or so on Forza).

The Car List: 10/10 - Over 1000 cars. That's a variety that has to be unmatched anywhere else. Sure, there are a few cars missing that I would like to have, but it doesn't detract from the mass selection of vehicle types. If you are lucky, you might find your car in there!

Variety: 10/10 - If it's in motor sports, you can drive it, and that is what makes GT5 special to me. Whether it's a Kart, or an X1 2010, you'll find something to do with the cars. The license tests return and are a true test of your driving skills, and I am strangely addicted to B-Spec now. The track editor is a nice addition as well.

Online: 9/10 - After the patch, I really have nothing to complain about other then the players themselves that I have run into. Most are cool, but as is the case with every racing game online, it all comes down to who you play with. The in game message board and gifting system is a huge plus.

Longevity: 10/10 - Between A-Spec and B-Spec, Special events, License tests, collecting 1000 cars and the Track editor, I have plenty to do. The total events from GT4-GT5 is down, but then again, GT5 is the first in the series to offer online and race updates every two weeks or so. It'll be interesting to see GT5 in another 6 months from now.

Fun Factor: 10/10 - Bottom line, this game is blast. So much to do and experience, and if you love cars, this is your game. I have yet to get bored (A-Spec level 27 and B-Spec level 12).

:)
 
After playing it for a long time, I finally agree with IGN and say this game deserves a 85. As a driving game, it's better than anything I've ever played before, but it has been wrapped up in a poor package. Huge divide between premium and standards, B spec is a love or hate thing (and I hate it) and A spec is way too short.

At least the driving never gets old, you can keep collecting cars and you can still have fun online.
 
10/10 for Graphics? Seriously? Sure some of it looks great, but plenty doesn't. 10/10 implies perfect, GT5 certainly isn't in the Graphics department.
 
:nervous:90 for its good points 40 for its bad points.
Way to much GT4 carrie over.

The unfinshed feel the game as.

the worst menu of any game out there.

No save option no way I will be doing 24 hrs of anything.

Missing Tracks.

too many good cars still not premium.

Too many Nissans as Premium.

Needed a better balance of cars game still has too many Japanese cars over other countrys.

still poor AI

Stupid penalty System very bad in rally events I for one got a little sick of losing 4 sec just for brushing a barrier in those events.


Too many Skyline/ GTR,s

Stupid pricing of cars & poor prize Credits.


Good points

Brillant Night Day effects on the right track Nurby being a good one.

Fun online racing but not with out its faults.


Fun to drive.


Good for hot lapping.

Still good fun but should have been way better after such a long time.


Will the fully patched version with all the bugs fixed & tracks added be called
GT6:idea:
 

Latest Posts

Back