Will you be updating to 2.12?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CodeRedR51
  • 780 comments
  • 46,670 views

Will you update to 2.12?

  • Yes

    Votes: 341 78.2%
  • No

    Votes: 95 21.8%

  • Total voters
    436
Why thank you but I ain't saying it to show off I just don't see the point of cheating and modding if PD wanted the Honda civic to go 5000 MPH they would of done It.
I don't mind drivetrain swapping or if you are gonna cheat just do it offline please :)
Its the word cheating I take exception to. There's more to it than just whacking up the power multiplier. This isn't cheating:


In fact, in the case of the Toyota GT-One, its actually a little slower than the original. The XJ13 has identical top speed.
 
Vagabond
Its the word cheating I take exception to. There's more to it than just whacking up the power multiplier. This isn't cheating:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cef0KTovgeA?hd=1">YouTube Link</a>

In fact in the case of the Toyota GT-One, its actually a little slower than the original. The XJ13 has identical top speed.

That funny because because Toyota GT -One goes over 300 mph and is quite a challenge on the route x oval which proves my point you don't need mod you just need to learn how to change the gear ratios and suspension settings to before advantageous to you :)
 
You are right Vagabond there isnt a damn thing we can do about but piss & moan but thats what I thought these threads and forums are for to vent frustration and share our our views on things but thats the thing about living in the USA when somthing happens we dont agree with we speak our no matter what some times helps most it dont but it does make you feel better

Hell Y'aw! USA! USA! USA!
 
That funny because because Toyota GT -One goes over 300 mph and is quite a challenge on the route x oval which proves my point you don't need mod you just need to learn how to change the gear ratios and suspension settings to before advantageous to you :)
You missed the point entirely - I changed the GT-One because it sounded like crap. Same for the XJ13. The point was not to go faster but to enjoy the experience more. I'm not being pompous or self-righteous about it because its something I did in my own time and space without affecting anyone else. That said, I sympathise with PDs decision to institute this update and I'll continue to modify my cars offline for my own enjoyment as I see fit using my chosen method. That doesn't make me a good or bad person, its just my choice, see?
Hell Y'aw! USA! USA! USA!
-SimonK will continue to post his pointless rejoinders to almost everything in an attempt to goad you if he doesn't either agree with you or finds your humour puerile.
Simon, maybe you should go and have a lie down or put a paper bag over your head or something?
 
I am not either. I have two PS3s, so I'm using one without the 2.12 for hybrids, and one with it for online, therefore I couldn't care less. :trouble:

Okay.

But also, I'm not being a **** about this situation to others because I understand how those who lost their hybrids feel.

Cute.

But I guess some people just can't live without conflict...

Umm, yeah. I wonder who, certainly ain't me. :sly:

Meh, whatever :indiff:
Last post on this thread.

Bye bye. :dopey:
 
@Vagabond You are a true scholar Sir. If your recent posts here don't silence people, I think we should just all just accept, some people will never learn.
 
It's interesting to see how the anti-modding faction will only discuss the issue of unlimited performance cars. I have yet to read a decent argument against PP limited cars or be shown proof that there is a real problem.

Cries that modding broke the HOLY TOS is laughable. Preventing paying customers from having a good time that doesn't harm anyone else isn't the point of a terms of service agreement. If you want to get technical, they are not providing me a service when I'm offline so therefore, I am not bound by that contract any longer anyway.

The action taken by PD is troubling to me. The lack of proper communication in general is also troubling. In the end though, I have decided to keep pace and play this out to see the full development of GT5. I know that patches are a precursor to a follow up title as every patch on the GT5 branch will be rolled back into the main code branch. Let's see if PD implement their own version of modding or if they keep trudging in the same tired direction.
 
Nobody needs to prove anything, PD have carried out the action and that's about the long and short of it. It doesn't matter if 8.5 million of the 9 million people that bought GT5 think hacked cars were fine, the facts are rather simple. They're gone. Time to move on.
 
Nobody needs to prove anything, PD have carried out the action and that's about the long and short of it. It doesn't matter if 8.5 million of the 9 million people that bought GT5 think hacked cars were fine, the facts are rather simple. They're gone. Time to move on.

This :)👍
 
Nobody needs to prove anything, PD have carried out the action and that's about the long and short of it. It doesn't matter if 8.5 million of the 9 million people that bought GT5 think hacked cars were fine, the facts are rather simple. They're gone. Time to move on.

Yep. Time to move on and buy another game and stop giving PD our money.
 
Nobody needs to prove anything, PD have carried out the action and that's about the long and short of it. It doesn't matter if 8.5 million of the 9 million people that bought GT5 think hacked cars were fine, the facts are rather simple. They're gone. Time to move on.

The unfortunate thing for PD is that they're not gone. Hidden parts still exist and work. Stage 4 and 5 turbos, Tripple Plate Clutch and Racing Flywheels, Super Soft Tyres etc.

And even worse for PD the thing I imagine they wanted to primarally fix, it's still possible to illigally obtain DLC cars for free.

Quote from NGU forums

It is believed that car data is now loaded from the Game Data stored ON the PS3 instead of the modified save data.

On a side note, changing the body code will replace the whole car with the parts of the body reference. Complete DLC cars for free anyone?

Swap body code of a DLC car onto a normal car, load up game, game data reads body code and add's all the correct parts for the DLC car. Oh dear PD.
 
Yep. Time to move on and buy another game and stop giving PD our money.

People_Who_Care.jpg


Bye.
 
I really don't understand the point behind getting DLC cars for free. I mean, are people really that cheap that they cant afford a pound or 2 (or whichever currency you might use).

In fact, it's actually totally backward not to buy the DLC. If the argument is that people don't think PD have done a good job with the game and don't want to spend more money on it, pirating the DLC in effect is taking income away from PD, giving them less resources to do a better job next time...
 
Yes i will update on my second HDD but only to annoying clean lobbys now until they bring the hybrids back....(hackers will find a way)
hopefully i can pis s off clean racers like tokoturismo and many other non modders...doesn't matter how childish and stupid this sounds... thats now my own senseless revenge if you dont like have fun and kick me:)
nobody should enjoy the game without the modders....thats my doctrine for now...
thats all i say to version 2.12
 
Yes i will update on my second HDD but only to annoying clean lobbys now until they bring they hybrids back....(hackers will find a way)
hopefully i can pis s off clean racers like tokoturismo and many other non modders...doesn't matter how childish and stupid this sounds... thats now my own senseless revenge
nobody should enjoy the game without the modders....thats my doctrine for now...

Wow. The bar has been raised for childish and pathetic reactions. Your avatar is very apt.
 
It's interesting to see how the anti-modding faction will only discuss the issue of unlimited performance cars. I have yet to read a decent argument against PP limited cars or be shown proof that there is a real problem.

The action taken by PD is troubling to me. The lack of proper communication in general is also troubling. In the end though, I have decided to keep pace and play this out to see the full development of GT5. I know that patches are a precursor to a follow up title as every patch on the GT5 branch will be rolled back into the main code branch. Let's see if PD implement their own version of modding or if they keep trudging in the same tired direction.

They don't want to discuss anything other than X1's and Civics because that's all they know. It's all based on rumour and hysteria and heresay because they heard from a friend who has a friend who read it online that some guy in some room once had a really fast car and he thinks it was a hybrid. They know nothing and want to know nothing about how the PP system continued to work with hybrids apart from the outrageously powered (and undriveable) cars that break the PP system, which are child-like simple to spot and control in any lobby. They just want to bury their heads in the sand and rant and rave about things they know nothing about. Welcome to the modern world...lol.

The unfortunate thing for PD is that they're not gone. Hidden parts still exist and work. Stage 4 and 5 turbos, Tripple Plate Clutch and Racing Flywheels, Super Soft Tyres etc.

And even worse for PD the thing I imagine they wanted to primarally fix, it's still possible to illigally obtain DLC cars for free.

Quote from NGU forums

Swap body code of a DLC car onto a normal car, load up game, game data reads body code and add's all the correct parts for the DLC car. Oh dear PD.

People who think all modding is fixed are in for a big surprise. PD only did a minimal amount of correcting, nowhere near what was necessary to "fix" this supposedly huge problem. They fixed the obvious stuff, but left at least some of the "tweaking" that really made hybrids perform. I for one am looking forward to building some more sleeper cars under the new hybrid regulations...lol.
 
Last edited:
Yes i will update on my second HDD but only to annoying clean lobbys now until they bring the hybrids back....(hackers will find a way)
hopefully i can pis s off clean racers like tokoturismo and many other non modders...doesn't matter how childish and stupid this sounds... thats now my own senseless revenge
nobody should enjoy the game without the modders....thats my doctrine for now...
thats all i say to version 2.12

I honestly thought the GT community relatively mature until I read this.
 
They don't want to discuss anything other than X1's and Civics because that's all they know. It's all based on rumour and hysteria and heresay because they heard from a friend who has a friend who read it online that some guy in some room once had a really fast car and he thinks it was a hybrid. They know nothing and want to know nothing about how the PP system continued to work with hybrids apart from the outrageously powered (and undriveable) cars that break the PP system, which are child-like simple to spot and control in any lobby. They just want to bury their heads in the sand and rant and rave about things they know nothing about. Welcome to the modern world...lol.



People who think all modding is fixed are in for a big surprise. PD only did a minimal amount of correcting, nowhere near what was necessary to "fix" this supposedly huge problem. They fixed the obvious stuff, but left in much or all of the "tweaking" that really made hybrids perform. I for one am looking forward to building some more sleeper cars under the new hybrid regulations...lol.

Don't put everyone in the same basket. It's also strange to see you so strongly advocating cheating when you were so against it to begin with.
 
I really don't understand the point behind getting DLC cars for free. I mean, are people really that cheap that they cant afford a pound or 2 (or whichever currency you might use).

In fact, it's actually totally backward not to buy the DLC. If the argument is that people don't think PD have done a good job with the game and don't want to spend more money on it, pirating the DLC in effect is taking income away from PD, giving them less resources to do a better job next time...

I am against DLC in most cases, same for pd's case. Most of these cars could have been in gt5, some should have been already. And even then, we are still missing a lot of great cars. And you know what's worse, the standard cars. They have no place on a ps3.

PD has made enough resources not to screw over their fanbase by not giving them what they want. If people are able to get DLC that costs money for free, I'm all for it. Why pay for something when you can have it for free, it doesn't make any sense.

This goes double for PD, again the standard cars and not having the aventador or sesto elemente just because they know people will fork over extra cash for the aventador. Not me, I would have gotten it for free though if it was possible.

You need to earn the money you get from me, throwing money at the screen is retarded.

Edit: hmmmm, I might still be getting the free DLC cars ti seems.
 
Why pay for something when you can have it for free, it doesn't make any sense.

If I may ask...do you actually know how the world works? Or are you like 5 or something? That is quite literally the least intelligent statement I have read for quite some time.

Although, I guess when you put it like that, it makes total sense. In fact, I might head down the road now and grab as much stuff as I can carry, 'cause, ya know, why pay for something when I can just take it for free.
 
And even then, we are still missing a lot of great cars. And you know what's worse, the standard cars. They have no place on a ps3.

The great cars are instead being saved for GT6, and get over with the standard cars already. GT5 is 2 years old and theres STILL 🤬 about the standard cars? Get real. :dunce:
 
What about Fair Use?

"Fair Use" is the production of new content using someone else's work. Recording your race and putting it on YouTube (for free) without asking permission is fair use.

Which you can still do, hybrids or not. They just don't want you using them online, and they way to do that is patching them out of the production code base. You are still free to do whatever you want with older versions offline.

Hacking software to operate outside it's designed parameters is not fair use, it's reverse engineering and exploitation. Whether you personally gain or do anything online with an exploit is immaterial. Some people do, and therefore the developer must respond with code that can't be tampered with to comply with their half of the service agreement.

There was a time when developers ignored online exploits. And it was a terrible time to be a player, trying to decide who's using an aim-bot, wall-hack, resource cheat, etc... Trust me; you may feel slighted but it's better to have a cop on the beat. And I will re-iterate that the real problem here is that PD hasn't fixed all the holes and it took them so long to respond with even a half-measure.
 
Last edited:
"I did what I did because all life is sacred. But when the object of your actions does not share that belief...I fear I have served the present by sacrificing the future."
 
Preventing paying customers from having a good time that doesn't harm anyone else isn't the point of a terms of service agreement. If you want to get technical, they are not providing me a service when I'm offline so therefore, I am not bound by that contract any longer anyway.

Correct, and Correct.

However, you're missing the point. Just because you personally are "doing no harm" does not mean the exploits are not being used to do harm. PD aren't attacking people personally, they're trying to close holes to preserve the integrity of the online environment.

And as for offline, well... that's the whole point of this thread. You can do whatever the eff you want offline. Go for it. I have yet to see anyone complain about someone choosing to keep their hybrids offline. Get a second HDD and enjoy it; to each their own.
 
Don't put everyone in the same basket. It's also strange to see you so strongly advocating cheating when you were so against it to begin with.

Good God Simon, give it a rest. This wasn't a valid argument when you tried to pull it 8 or so pages ago, and it's hilariously hypocritical for you to say "don't put everyone in the same basket" after you basically stated the idiotic idea that the people who are calling GT5 dead now are the same people who had been defending GT5's online play up until the hybrids came out.




Nevermind the innate hilarity of you of all people being one of the ones mocking people for complaining about GT5 online.
 
Last edited:
Back