syagreIf your car has a jet propulsion engine, technically it would be a 0 wheel-drive. In that case, I don't think can handle you car properly into curves (lack of grip).
In Reality, the Group C cars were faster than F1 cars of their day. Making 1200hp in some cases, like the Nissan R92CP's turbo V8.
Incorrect. The car has a gas turbine engine and a CVT. It doesn't get it's power from thrust, it's a turboshaft engine. Exhaust turbines in turboshafts harness a greater percentage of the energy of the exhaust gas than those of a turbojet/turbofan (conventional jet) engine and convert it into rotary force. It's how helicopters and prop-planes have jet engines. The CVT in the car is necessary because jet engines can't spool up and down the way normal engines do. In a gas turbine aircraft, you set the turbine speed and lock it, and control airspeed by altering propeller pitch.
I didn't say the X1 or the RedBullRacing F1 cars or previous cars designed by Newey haven't been through all sorts of computer programs to calculate and test each aspect before something gets actually made as there's a whole team of engineers surrounding him but Newey himself doesn't use any computer program like CAD or similar but still draws the design of a new car on a drawing board first ( and in quite some detail too, full technical drawings not some loose sketches ).
Romanticized? Nope, he's perhaps indeed the last of a dying breed still preferring an old school approach and it actually works for him so why change?
Some people just think better and clearer using the methods they always used before, the results he comes up with using this method are far from old school though.
![]()
But machines with a gearbox deriving power from a turbine still vary the speed of the turbine more similarly to a regular engine. Biggest difference though is that there is a rather considerable response lag.
And RedBull's current F1 car is not dominating in pure speed
By pure speed I meant faster than every other car around the track, they have won all pole except 2, maybe 3 not sure. If pure speed means top speed alone than I'm sorry for my french, those guys at BBC use the expression "pure speed" to describe RBR being dominant in qualif as opposed to the actual race.
Not necessarily. I only have experience in the aviation industry and absolutely no experience with turbines driving wheels, so I'll gladly admit if I'm wrong here. But if you lock the throttle in place on say, a Huey, then it's locked. The only time you might have a decrease in N1 would be if you just yanked the hell out of the collective. Same goes for a King Air, you set the throttle lock and the engines stay at a constant speed, regardless of prop speed or pitch.
I imagine there would have to be some sort of give somewhere in the system if power is being transmitted to drive wheels and being forced to move a car, because there's a lot more resistance there than provided by air over an airfoil, but I dunno how it would work.
If you're in the know, fill me in!![]()
Romanticized? Nope, he's perhaps indeed the last of a dying breed still preferring an old school approach and it actually works for him so why change?
Some people just think better and clearer using the methods they always used before, the results he comes up with using this method are far from old school though.
Look Familiar ?
designed for gt..whatever more like an F1 team doing what they do best "borrowing" someone elses design and adapting it.
skip to 3:10
this is from 2007 by the way
Its not what I was expecting... I was expecting some mutant F1 car, but this is just intense! And anyone saying its not a real car isnt giving the designers much credit. How do you think RedBull knows its brand new areo kit is going to be faster than the last one before they have even tested it? THEY FREAKIN DESIGN IT ON A COMPUTER! If anyone has any doubts about whether this would or wouldnt work in reality is kidding themselves.
I think it's ugly and that it might be highly overused both on and offline. It's only competition could be the Escudo PP or a perfectly tuned street/race car.
Anyway, no rant. Just my thoughts.
I think it's ugly and that it might be highly overused both on and offline. It's only competition could be the Escudo PP or a perfectly tuned street/race car.
Anyway, no rant. Just my thoughts.
I think it's ugly and that it might be highly overused both on and offline. It's only competition could be the Escudo PP or a perfectly tuned street/race car.
Anyway, no rant. Just my thoughts.
Would probably be better to find a video of an F1 lap and speed it up by 30-40% because the X1 won't go through the hairpin at 90mph. It'll make up it's time in acceleration.
Nah, I doubt it.. although we didn't know what it looked like, we knew it was there, so not really a surprise.I hope this isn't the 'not revealed yet' feature that Kaz is talking about (if he was talking about one in the first place) but sweet! looks good.
I think it's ugly and that it might be highly overused both on and offline. It's only competition could be the Escudo PP or a perfectly tuned street/race car.
Anyway, no rant. Just my thoughts.